2023/24 Soccer Thread

Leeds: Sold to the 49ers.

West Ham have had a loan offer for Harry Maguire dismissed by Manchester United

Huh, wonder why.

West Ham are under pressure to spend after selling Rice but they have not been quick off the mark. Fulham are demanding £80m for Palhinha and West Ham are not optimistic about their chances of landing the Portugal international, who excelled after joining Fulham from Sporting last summer, although there have been suggestions that £50m could be enough.

Definitely try and get as close to £80m as possible, please.

Inter Miami have unveiled Messi and Busquets, and it looks like Alba is next, and then possibly Luis Suarez.

Wathcing Messi's unveiling was fairly hilarious (Miami tweeting out "Welcome home" is... heh c'mon dude), if only because Ithe whole time I was like "You know it was just like this when he arrived at PSG, right? And how did that end?"

EA Sports FC Just Killed FIFA 24

EA Sports FC 2024 has secured deals with the Premier League, La Liga, and the UEFA Champions League. The new FIFA game doesn’t stand a chance.

I mean, we knew FIFA's game was going to be total sh*t, but it's going to be such total sh*t.

For maximum chaos, I hope FIFA somehow gets an exclusive deal with the Saudi league and the PIF plows a kerbillion bucks into making FIFA's game.

EDIT: That's assuming FIFA ever makes a game. They'd said they'd make one of several announcements in the third quarter of last year.

I was so confused reading that last post.
So EA lost the FIFA branding name, right? This was what I was missing.
And FIFA, the organization, is going to create a game? Who are the developers?

slazev wrote:

I was so confused reading that last post.
So EA lost the FIFA branding name, right? This was what I was missing.
And FIFA, the organization, is going to create a game? Who are the developers?

EA didn't really "lose" the branding. FIFA wanted an obscene amount of money to continue the licence, and EA said no.

FIFA immediately announced that they would produce their own game. Gianni Infantino said (I'm not making this up, he really said it): "The new FIFA game – the FIFA 25, 26, 27 and so on – will always be the best egame for any girl or boy,” He also added that FIFA would “have news on this very soon”. That was in March. There has been no news, as far as I'm aware.

So EA games won't have world cup going forward? But they'll have all the individual leagues and players that everyone wants anyway?

FIFA is not too bright...

Stele wrote:

So EA games won't have world cup going forward? But they'll have all the individual leagues and players that everyone wants anyway?

I'd imagine they can still have the World Cup, they just can't call it "World Cup". So it'll be functionally the same, but named "Global Trophy" or something.

FIFA think their branding - just having "FIFA" on the cover - has become essential to the success of the franchise.

Tasty Pudding wrote:

Gianni Infantino said (I'm not making this up, he really said it): "The new FIFA game – the FIFA 25, 26, 27 and so on – will always be the best egame for any girl or boy,” He also added that FIFA would “have news on this very soon”. That was in March.

March 2022, to be clear.

Like, I know where Australia and New Zealand are and I know how time zones work but I was still bummed out when I just realized that most of the World Cup games are going to be at unwatchable times for me.

Yeah, I might still be awake in time to see part of New Zealand/Norway, but the vast majority of the games will be on while I'm unconscious.

Henderson to Al-Ettifaq is a done deal, £12 million's not bad to be honest.

Fabinho to Al-Ittihad is pretty much a done deal for ~ £40 million

Now they are after Luis Diaz, although all indications are that Liverpool won't be selling.

I'm just beginning to wonder if this isn't some sort of plot to disrupt Liverpool so that Newcastle maintain the Champions League spots as they are really running hard into difficulties with FFP. Conspiracy level thinking admittedly, but there is definitely some targetting going on.

Why many Women's World Cup stars are missing due to torn ACLs

The medical community has long known that women athletes tear ACLs at a rate two to eight times more often than their male counterparts. The results of most studies fall between four to six times. According to a paper published in the Journal of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, one in 19 women soccer players tear an ACL.

As for why, there are multiple factors at play. Dr. Holly Silvers-Granelli has a Ph.D. in biomechanics and applied physiology, is the owner of Velocity Physical Therapy in Santa Clara, California, and is the chair of MLS' Medical Assessment Research Committee. Silvers Granelli points to six perceived risk factors -- emphasis on "perceived" -- that can explain why women soccer players tear their ACLs more often than men.

One factor is the physiological differences between men and women. In women, the ACL tends to be smaller, and the notch in the femur that the ACL passes through tends to be narrower. That leaves less room for the ACL to move, which means a greater likelihood of impingement on the ACL, and thus more risk of injury.

The second risk factor has to do with environmental factors -- grass vs. artificial turf, temperature, precipitation, choice of cleat be it molded or studded. It's worth noting that only in the past seven years have manufacturers started to produce cleats specifically designed for women.

A third is tied to hormonal surges during a woman's menstrual cycle, which affects the laxity or looseness of ligaments. A fourth risk factor is genetics in that if a parent tears an ACL, their child is more likely to do the same, though that could be down to an athletic parent exposing their child to sports. A fifth is equal access to resources such as quality facilities and knowledgeable coaches and training staff. The last is biomechanics: how an athlete runs, jumps, cuts, etc.

The first factor is what Silvers-Granelli calls "non-modifiable" in that there's little that can be done to undo millions of years of human evolution. The same goes for genetics. The rest, however, are what make solving the ACL problem something of a moving target. When asked if there was one factor that contributed more than others Silvers-Granelli said, "If this were a Venn diagram, it would look like a scatter plot" with little to no overlap.

Why are ACL injuries in women still so much of a problem?

One factor is what is referred to in the medical community as "compliance," otherwise known as convincing coaches that a dynamic warmup (aka "moving while you stretch") is worth doing. The tools might be out there, but they're not always being implemented by managers. And if they are, they aren't being used enough even though it's free and requires no additional equipment. The bare minimum for using a dynamic warmup is two times a week, though four to five sessions are considered ideal.

Dr. Rachel Frank is a Denver-based orthopedic surgeon who estimates she does "a couple of hundred" ACL reconstructions per year, and is also the team orthopedist for the Colorado Rapids. She said convincing coaches to implement such programs is a huge obstacle to reducing the number of ACL tears.

"You can advise a prevention program and teach [a dynamic warmup] as much as possible, but we've got to get people to do it, and it can't be just going through the motions," she said. "It can't be five minutes of running around the field doing some single leg hops and calling that a prevention program. It's got to be time and dedicated effort. And I think in 2023, time is a commodity, and if a training session for a team is 90 minutes, 20 to 30 of those minutes need to be focused on this prevention program, dynamic warmup, etc."

Lack of available practice time is often offered up by coaches as the main reason more teams don't implement a dynamic warmup, even though at 15 minutes, it's not cutting that much into training time. Coaches prize contact with the ball, and the dynamic warmup would cut into that, so the thinking goes. Silvers-Granelli also noted in her work with MLS teams, performance staff can become "a bit territorial" when it comes to such things as warmup routines.

The resistance seems mystifying. The more players stay healthy, the better the odds are of winning on the field, and coaches are ultimately judged on wins and losses. But access to resources, from both a socioeconomic and gender perspective, can also play a part. That goes for equipment, quality facilities and access to educated training staff.

Mahrez to Al Ahli for $39m.

So, they haven't gotten a lot of the top-top-level players. They've definitely gotten good ones, but it's overwhelmingly been players at the tail-end of their prime. It's still very eyebrow-raising, and I feel totally safe saying that this isn't going to be a one-year thing, they're in this for the long haul.

Thank you for this link.

It is also a problem in the Women's Australian Football League.

IMAGE(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1YxgFxWAAMYi5-?format=jpg&name=small)

There's lying, and then there's LYING.

Prederick wrote:

Mahrez to Al Ahli for $39m.

So, they haven't gotten a lot of the top-top-level players. They've definitely gotten good ones, but it's overwhelmingly been players at the tail-end of their prime. It's still very eyebrow-raising, and I feel totally safe saying that this isn't going to be a one-year thing, they're in this for the long haul.

Mahrez is 32 so very nice cash in time for City not that City need the money.

What's Salahs price when he goes? After this year he will have 1 year left on his contract and be 32 so it's pretty much a done deal if they bring the cash.

IMAGE(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1fVEudX0AAd4km?format=jpg&name=medium)

IMAGE(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F1fVE6DX0AUT52C?format=jpg&name=medium)

Oh, also:

IMAGE(https://media.gettyimages.com/id/1544356347/photo/new-zealand-women-soccer-team-seen-during-the-fifa-womens.webp?s=2048x2048&w=gi&k=20&c=b6INCkCAf9RdvE9dFhYvfQ34UFnUCBC6q9NZxe6mUNs=)

Still early in the tourney. Wish I was awake for any of these games, but c'est la vie.

Big win for Spain though, and I'm interested to see how well the USWNT do tonight, although I do agree with eh critique that we are putting way too much on Megan Rapinoe when she is not our best player anymore by a longshot.

There are six women named "Tran" in the Vietnamese squad, and five "Nguyens".

Glad I'm not a commentator...

I have.... so many questions.

Was literally about to post "no USWNT goals in 13 minutes sack the boss"

I'm sure it's a bizarre coincidence that Messi's first Inter Miami match is happening at the same time as USWNT's opener in the World Cup.

Tasty Pudding wrote:

There are six women named "Tran" in the Vietnamese squad, and five "Nguyens".

Glad I'm not a commentator...

Seems like it would make it easier for them.

The US is clearly superior, but can't seem to get it's attack quite right while Vietnam are defending with everything they've got.

(Yes, the historical parallels are right there.)

I still say this ends 3 or 4-0 to the US, but we're reaching that point where "could they steal one and get a 1-1 draw?" doesn't seem so far-fetched.

EDIT: nvm

Offside overturned? Cool

To be clear, Cruz Azul fouled Messi at the top of the arc, in the 93rd minute of a tie match?

This stuff writes itself I guess.

Prederick wrote:

I have.... so many questions.

You can dig around on Twitter if you want more. I wouldn't recommend it though, it's a bit sordid.