
Anything related to the midterms.
It would be nice to have 51 senators. I am just annoyed at the GOP plan to handle climate change which is just tamer words for doing nothing. They want to dress up doing nothing.
Good when the play works. Scary when it goes wrong.
This is the reason the Mastriano play in PA got so strongly criticized early on. It was looking bad for a while there, and Mastriano is an absolute nut.
Just a very strong headline there.
LOL, dude lied about literally everything and yep, all that matters is the (R) next to his name.
Anyway, Dem Gov. in Oregon (sad Phil Knight), Repub Gov. in Nevada (I know I'm a woke libtard, but the "split the ticket" voters will always baffle me, assuming Dems win the Nevada senate seat).
LOL, dude lied about literally everything and yep, all that matters is the (R) next to his name.
Anyway, Dem Gov. in Oregon (sad Phil Knight), Repub Gov. in Nevada (I know I'm a woke libtard, but the "split the ticket" voters will always baffle me, assuming Dems win the Nevada senate seat).
Be thankful for split ticket. Otherwise, we would have Sent Walker right now.
Candidates matter.
So riddle me this. 8% more white women voted GOP in 2022 than 2018. Despite all these white women yelling loudly that the GOP messed up big time when they did everything they did.
I’m telling you it’s all about what they say vs what they actually do once they have the anonymity of voting. White folks value one thing and one thing only….the preservation of white supremacy.
So riddle me this. 8% more white women voted GOP in 2022 than 2018. Despite all these white women yelling loudly that the GOP messed up big time when they did everything they did.
I’m telling you it’s all about what they say vs what they actually do once they have the anonymity of voting. White folks value one thing and one thing only….the preservation of white supremacy.
I'd be curious to see the age and geography of that increase. My guess would be older white women in southern suburban areas who spend a lot on platinum blond, but that almost seems too obvious.
According to https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2022... there was a 7% increase in the number of GOP voters amongst black women, and a 14% increase amongst Latina women.
I didn’t find a geographical break down yet, or anyone attempting to correlate who complained about the GOP before hand but voted for them anyway.
8% more white women translates to a LOT more actual people than a 16% increase in POC women.
I've said it before: white people, especially white men, are the problem.
I think we still have a huge problem in the US with voters buying in to some candidate's story without considering what they will do once in power.
Leave it to Republicans to warp and corrupt every positive advancement in power representation that minorities have gained over the decades. Case in point, Hershel Walker and dare I say the glaring one: Clarence Thomas.
But this struck me as catastrophic going forward when I saw a special on Hispanic voting on MSNBC. There were two scary points: that working class Hispanic men were buying in to the same working class white Trump voter bullsh*t. The other was a VA house race that was very uncomfortable to watch.
It was Spanberger's VA district that had been redrawn to be more competitive. She an incumbent Dem white woman was running against Vega, a Rep Latina from El Salvador. Now Vega had an impressive story and background: brother was killed by MS-13 at a young age, military, she was a cop and came across as very genuine. But her stances were straight up blue lives matter police state Kool-Aid, immigrants are criminals, build the wall bullsh*t.
Yet they interviewed a couple of her supporters and the younger daughter first time voting supports Vega because of her humble roots and that she also came from El Salvador. It was the same messaging when Kamala Harris was elected "for the first time, someone in the White House looks like me" empowering event but completely perverted to empower fascists.
The good news is Spanberger won with over 50% of the vote. (seems like that is the best we can hope for these days) But how many more of these sh*t candidates with attractive stories and background are we going to have to fend off for the next 10 years? I mean, if social media is anything to go by, that is all we will ever get going forward...
I’m telling you it’s all about what they say vs what they actually do once they have the anonymity of voting. White folks value one thing and one thing only….the preservation of white supremacy.
#NotAllWhitePeople
#ButPrettyDamnClose
8% more white women translates to a LOT more actual people than a 16% increase in POC women.
Sure, but if you want to understand WHY the 8% increase exists, I don't think you can hand-wave away similar increases across the board. Something clearly drew women in general increasingly to the GOP vote this time.
So riddle me this. 8% more white women voted GOP in 2022 than 2018. Despite all these white women yelling loudly that the GOP messed up big time when they did everything they did.
Is that "%2022WhiteWomenVotes = (2018WhiteWomenDemVote% - 8) + (2018WhiteWomenGOPVote% + 8)", or is that "counting vote totals, 2022WhiteWomenGOPVotes = 2018WhiteWomenGOPVotes * 1.08"? The former seems highly problematic; the latter depends on the total number of votes. If 20% more white women voted and the GOP count only grew by 8%, that's trending in the right direction.
I'm sorry, standard BBCode is insufficient for your mathematical expressiveness. Can we get a Mathematica plugin for this forum?
So riddle me this. 8% more white women voted GOP in 2022 than 2018. Despite all these white women yelling loudly that the GOP messed up big time when they did everything they did.
PoC got some table scraps they didn't "deserve" at the expense of white people.
That's all.
My guess is that like many people they have not felt the pain yet and have not learned yet. They will happily ignore it all until it is their hand on the stove. "I didn't think this could hurt me" will then be all the op-ed articles.
I forget where I heard this originally, but it seems apt here...
You have a bunch of friends over for dinner. You vote on what to have. Some of your friends want pizza. Some of your friends want to kill and eat you. Even if pizza wins, you still have a serious problem.
I forget where I heard this originally, but it seems apt here...
You have a bunch of friends over for dinner. You vote on what to have. Some of your friends want pizza. Some of your friends want to kill and eat you. Even if pizza wins, you still have a serious problem.
It’s a famous Ben Franklin quote, though his version involved lambs and wolves. There’s also a… more graphic… version from the Transmetropolitan comic books that frequently gets reposted around election time.
TheGameguru wrote:I’m telling you it’s all about what they say vs what they actually do once they have the anonymity of voting. White folks value one thing and one thing only….the preservation of white supremacy.
#NotAllWhitePeople
#ButPrettyDamnClose
If you are a black person in America and the odds are any white person you meet is about 70-80% likely to have voted for the Party that actively demonizes you at every opportunity and considers you less of an American wouldn’t the prudent option be just assume this person doesn’t have my best interest at heart?
As for the rise in poc voting for the GOP one has to realize how 400+ years of brainwashing and manipulation can have on a persons self identity and worth. Just look at all the black Christians and realize how exactly they got there.
JLS wrote:8% more white women translates to a LOT more actual people than a 16% increase in POC women.
Sure, but if you want to understand WHY the 8% increase exists, I don't think you can hand-wave away similar increases across the board. Something clearly drew women in general increasingly to the GOP vote this time.
I'd be interested to see the makeup of those 8% by age, where they live, their marital status, and how their husbands voted if they're married. Or just the demographics between married partners in general. (I imagine those would be difficult numbers to verify, I just wish we could).
I love my boomer parents, however my (filipino/latina) mom votes whatever my dad votes. They're staunch democrats who will often vote for younger or female candidates that align with thier views, however they are angling more conservative as they get into their 70's that I and my queer siblings try to work and walk back while they continue to carry on in their voting years. However whatever my (very smart, very sharp, but privileged and white) dad decides, they both tend to end up voting. I imagine in more conservative or republican households you'd see similar. Especially if those are households that still maintain a head of the household/father knows best kind of mindset.
(disclaimer: my mother is a strong and stable woman, she just grew up in a different country during a different era. The matriarchy runs strong in this one, but the 'head of the household' mindset still runs deep there too).
As a child of full immersion and indoctrination of an immigrant parent, I am not the least bit surprised there are hard R voters amongst non-white folks in the US that are of typical voting age. The boomers and gen x'ers, and even many millenials and younger (though to a dramatically lesser degree) often bought into the american exceptionalism and elitism and privlege that the republican party peddles. Humans are weirdly persistent about things they don't have, but still want.
As we get older, we as a species often get more afraid of a world that no longer caters to us, centers us, or considers us. It's scary, it's terrifying, becoming frail. And one thing conservatives, and the republican party in general, wheel and deal in really well is fear-based marketing. If you are baffled by what could make people vote R, I think it's effective fear-based marketing to older demographics that don't realize "the news" as they knew it no longer exists, and still consume content from the same "news sources" that now operate from a fear-based click/view-driven economy. The republican party does fear really well.
Also might not hurt to consider that if some places are going to be suppressing or intimidating D voters, and that group may have a higher number of women/non white folks...then you're going to see a higher percentage of R votes among those demographics that aren't being suppressed? That's why I don't like loose percentages as facts, you may not be seeing the other parts of the percentile and what may be impacting those results.
Percentiles often annoy me as they're often used to make numbers sound better or worse than what they actually are to sell a point. It's oversimplification in order to be more appealing to whatever point you're trying to make. They're tools to appeal to emotion while pretending to appeal to science or whatever.
TheGameguru wrote:I’m telling you it’s all about what they say vs what they actually do once they have the anonymity of voting. White folks value one thing and one thing only….the preservation of white supremacy.
#NotAllWhitePeople
#ButPrettyDamnClose
Seriously. Can we keep the sweeping racist generalizations out of here? Saying ALL white people care about something is just wrong
Those numbers, from the link, seemed a bit odd honestly. Unless I was misreading it. It basically said every single demographic voted conservative more. Young, old, white, minority etc. Which is a bit odd considering the outcome. Of course where they voted matters I suppose.
H.P. Lovesauce wrote:TheGameguru wrote:I’m telling you it’s all about what they say vs what they actually do once they have the anonymity of voting. White folks value one thing and one thing only….the preservation of white supremacy.
#NotAllWhitePeople
#ButPrettyDamnClose
Seriously. Can we keep the sweeping racist generalizations out of here? Saying ALL white people care about something is just wrong
From the perspective of a black American is there a difference?
TheGameguru wrote:White folks value one thing and one thing only….the preservation of white supremacy.
Seriously. Can we keep the sweeping racist generalizations out of here? Saying ALL white people care about something is just wrong
"White folks" != "ALL white people"
Guru is, at least in my reading, speaking of a demographic, not making an "every single individual with white skin" proclamation.
As was often said in the time of #NotAllMen: "if it doesn't sound like you, then we're not talking about you".
Democrats hold the Senate. Georgia will just be icing on the top.
Democrats hold the Senate. Georgia will just be icing on the top.
Icing that will make confirming judges faster! Walker's biggest argument to get R voters to turn out in the runoffs also just went up in smoke.
Democrats hold the Senate. Georgia will just be icing on the top.
Now is this mean they actually hold the Senate or that they have 48 senators and two assholes with the VP breaking the tie?
Chairman_Mao wrote:Democrats hold the Senate. Georgia will just be icing on the top.
Now is this mean they actually hold the Senate or that they have 48 senators and two assholes with the VP breaking the tie?
They'll have 49 and two assholes. If the Dems end up keeping the house, then the good news is that Manchin and Sinema are assholes in different ways. That was a big problem at 50-50 because their no goes were mutually exclusive. Now you just need one or the other.
If they don't keep the house, then 51 means Dems get to be majorities on the committees. No discharge petitions needed so you can get judges and nominees through faster. Neither of them has been a problem when it comes to judges at least.
Edit: Oh, and having majorities on the committees means they can start using the subpoena powers.
Pages