
Cryptocurrency! Either it's going to disrupt everything and usher in a new era of artistic and consumer freedom, or it'll hasten the climate apocalypse while largely benefitting a tiny number of investors. Let's yell about it!
I’m saying someone who invests their time, talents, and energy in something as laughably stupid as NFTs is not a smart person, any more than someone investing in playing roulette is a smart person.
I just think we are using the word a bit differently. I'm referring to intellectual capacity, while you're making a value judgement based on certain choices made. It's the difference between saying "Einstein was really smart, but he was dumb to invest in that losing real estate deal" and "Einstein was not really smart at all, since he invested in a losing real estate deal, which was a stupid thing to do."
Make sense? The thing I've noticed over the years is that many of my friends and coworkers who are very smart with engineering, with computers, with mathematics, with business, well-read sometimes, often capable of actual critical thinking and reasoning, lose all those skills when the topic is something that touches on what they feel is part of their identity. And that's a human thing, because we are still used to identifying with those around us rather than breaking with them, even on things that involve survival.
Those choices are stupid, often hateful, but that does not affect their intellectual capabilities. It just means they over-ride them when their emotions take over.
“Intellectual capacity” is, at its core, also a value judgment though. There is no single test for intellectual capacity, and it means as many different things to as many different people as my use of the word “smart” in this conversation.
But yes, you’ve confirmed that my original quip - that someone is using some new definition of “smart” that includes folks wasting their entire potential on a painfully obvious scam - was indeed correct.
But you now have no way of asserting that someone who otherwise is very successful and has multiple indicators of what we refer to as "intelligence", is in any way smart, simply because they believe one stupid thing. Just as intelligence has many different domains, being stupid in one area of judgement does not nullify the existence of the others.
That QAnon Trump guy could still be one of the best at turning out custom space-craft qualified electronics by hand, and I think anyone would agree it takes some flavor of smarts to do that kind of work. (And yes, this is a friend of mine...). He's smart, but he has made some stupid choices based on his Party allegiance.
Real life example: my dad! Was a fantastic doctor and ICU director till he retired.
Also believes 9/11 truthers and plans to vote for RFK Jr.
Huge difference between intelligence and knowledge. Most examples have show knowledge not necessarily intelligence. Not to mention opportunity. How many poor but otherwise intelligent people are denied opportunity and knowledge.
But you now have no way of asserting that someone who otherwise is very successful and has multiple indicators of what we refer to as "intelligence".
We’re kind of in a weird rabbit hole but yeah, I don’t think the human brain has access to the data, applications, systems, or technology it needs to understand, define, or categorize its own intelligence. Thus all attempts to quantify intelligence remain qualitative. Or, in other words, value judgments.
People may disagree but I would like to point out that the only ones who disagree with this are, in fact, other human brains, all of which are by nature biased on the topic of their own comprehension!
But sure, “smart in one way but not other ways.” We agree.
Intelligence is knowing that Frankenstein is the doctor.
Wisdom is knowing that Frankenstein is the monster.
People may disagree but I would like to point out that the only ones who disagree with this are, in fact, other human brains, all of which are by nature biased on the topic of their own comprehension!
The only way that works is the hard claim that there's no way to *objectively* measure any form of cognitive capabilities. I think we've found a plethora of ways to do that. The problem comes in when people think that knowing that some people can solve certain types of problems faster than others means that they can solve *all* problems faster than others. That's how we ended up with various domain or function-based theories of intelligence.
But I would strongly dispute that intelligence tests measure *nothing*. Even with cultural bias, the tests do differentiate between different types of problems - language use, visual puzzles, logic, and so forth - that are statistically distinguishable across large populations of test-takers.
It's just that most people don't bother to read the fine print, including the bit about IQ tests not actually being predictors of success in life...
I read that as "Crypto eyeball scam" and it didn't strike me as out-of-place at all.
Didn't they start this project a few years back, in Africa and maybe India?
Wow that right there is some scummy garbage. It makes me think of some cartoonishly villainous wealthy fop in a top hat and tails being driven through a poor neighborhood in a Bentley convertible, shouting “free money!” into a bullhorn and tossing coins to throngs of desperate people. Then when they try to spend their “free money” they learn that the fine print on the coins requires them to surrender an internal organ.
Maybe I have an overactive imagination. It’s still scummy though.
From https://twitter.com/Cryptadamist/sta...
Tether's cash through the ages:
➤ Dec 31st, 2022: $5.31 billion
➤ Mar 31st, 2023: $481 million
➤ Jun 30th, 2023: $90 million
That's an interesting trajectory for a company theoretically swimming in coupon payments from $70 billion in treasuries.
$70B should be generating at least $3.5B in interest every year - where is the money going?
where is the money going?
To a lovely apocalypse/99% uprising survival compound somewhere in New Zealand, Colorado, or Alaska.
Assuming those numbers are accurate and that I'm reading it right, their total assets have gone up a bit and they've got more US Treasury notes. Isn't the real problem that they don't have a way to cover withdrawals? Unless the plan is to say, "Hey, US Government, we're going down the drain here with this run and we can't cover our customers and all we've got are Treasury notes...better bail us out!"
SBF bail revoked for witness tampering!
SBF bail revoked for witness tampering!
But he's such a nice guy
Top_Shelf wrote:SBF bail revoked for witness tampering!
But he's such a nice guy
yes, but is he on a swim team?
"Nobody told us it was a dumb idea except for everybody we refused to listen to!"
WAGMI indeed.
We are all going to make it! Nobody ever said "it" would be the same thing for everyone, though. For example, what the people who bought those NFTs made was "a bad decision".
In 2021 and 2022, the NFT market saw a huge bull run, at one point leading to $2.8 billion in monthly trading volume.
That number would be a lot smaller if you could subtract the "trades" where people were selling it to their own alternate accounts.
The market isn't gone because there was a frenzy that fizzled out. The market's gone because the frenzy was fake to begin with, and when it failed to hoodwink enough people to sell to, there was no longer any reason to keep up the charade.
It was always designed around the rug pull. The only folks upset about it are idiots and folks who mistimed their pull.
Wasn't GameStop or some company supposedly investing in NFTs? Did that die?
They’ve been “winding down“ their wallet offering. The NFT store is still up but it seems to more or less be in maintenance mode.
Jake Moody BANGS a 21-yard field goal, to use the phrasing Al Michaels did for the kick.
Uh you got your streams crossed
Pages