NFL 2020: Draft

The Washington Riverboats? They've got the right coach for it.

Enix wrote:

The Washington Riverboats?

Somehow, just somehow, an entire stadium of dudes making the motorboat sound seems worse than the chop.

*Legion* wrote:

Only animal names remain. You all are Jaguars fans now.

Jaguars eat babies. Probably. If given the chance.

KC Star: Vahe Gregorian: It’s time for the Chiefs to defuse the cultural offenses they enable and reflect

Problematic as the Chiefs name itself might be and obviously inflammatory as associated iconography and behaviors from the tomahawk chop to cartoonish dress-ups long have been, they’ve also been buffered by the presence in the NFL of the Washington team that embraces an ethnic slur that

longstanding Star policy precludes us from directly citing.

But with Washington apparently seriously contemplating a name change under financial pressure from sponsors amid the reckoning for racial justice these last few months, the context of being known as the Chiefs may soon change if they stand as the only NFL team to enable such contempt in the name of entertainment and tradition.

So the crux of the challenge for the franchise (and the community) going forward will be to honestly assess to what degree the name is inherently divisive and, accordingly, if it feasibly can be uncoupled from the behavior it evokes.
(As I considered even that question anew, it struck me that I found myself thinking, “Can the Chiefs still get away with the name?” Which seems like a conversation point in itself.)

MilkmanDanimal wrote:
*Legion* wrote:

Only animal names remain. You all are Jaguars fans now.

Jaguars eat babies. Probably. If given the chance.

Jaguars, as in Aztec warriors?

Enix wrote:

The Washington Riverboats? They've got the right coach for it.

I've been holding out hope that Snyder goes full Olympics and has the team come up with an impossible-to-offend-anyone mascot that's essentially featureless.

IMAGE(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1a/Izzy_%28Atlanta_1996%29.png/200px-Izzy_%28Atlanta_1996%29.png)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/cZm1OHJ.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/hiwH4X4.jpg)

Those are all real?

*Legion* wrote:

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/hiwH4X4.jpg)

It really is hard to take offense at the "I Just Pissed Myself" mascot on the left.

Rat Boy wrote:
*Legion* wrote:

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/hiwH4X4.jpg)

It really is hard to take offense at the "I Just Pissed Myself" mascot on the left.

And now it’s all I see.

Jayhawker wrote:
Rat Boy wrote:
*Legion* wrote:

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/hiwH4X4.jpg)

It really is hard to take offense at the "I Just Pissed Myself" mascot on the left.

And now it’s all I see.

The IJPM mascot would be apt for the Washington TBAs, considering the team has only five winning seasons and one playoff win this century.

Washington TBAs or TBDs?

garion333 wrote:

Those are all real?

Top one is "Izzy" from Summer '96 in Atlanta, "Neve" and "Gliz" from Winter '06 in Turin, and the cyclopses "Wenlock" and "Mandeville" from Summer 2012 in London.

Nagano had the "Snowlets":

IMAGE(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/57/Sukki%2C_Nokki%2C_Lekki_and_Tsukki.png)

Alright, while we wait for Snyder to get his trademark ducks in a row...

What name would *you* pick for Washington?

Current betting odds:

RedTails - 3:1
Generals - 4:1
Presidents - 5:1
Lincolns - 8:1
Veterans - 8:1
Capitols - 9:1
Americans - 10:1
Memorials - 10:1
Monuments - 10:1

Other options people are bringing up:

- Hogs / Red Hogs
- Senators
- Warriors
- Red Clouds
- Red Hawks
- RedWolves
- Kings
- Arlingtons

I see the option of Capitols with an "O" to be distinct from the Capitals hockey team (and refer back to the old pro basketball team), but I instead vote for Washington Football Capitals.

Washington Foreskins? It would at least save them some money on changing all the signs.

They should go with Washington Huskies, to confuse everyone.

Stele wrote:

They should go with Washington Huskies, to confuse everyone.

When the people of Seattle complain, change it to the SuperSonics.

*Legion* wrote:
Stele wrote:

They should go with Washington Huskies, to confuse everyone.

When the people of Seattle complain, change it to the SuperSonics.

Baseball team names are dumb.

garion333 wrote:

Baseball (...) dumb.

Agreed.

*Legion* wrote:
garion333 wrote:

Baseball (...) dumb.

Agreed.

Damn Cardinals.

*Legion* wrote:

"Wenlock" and "Mandeville" from Summer 2012 in London.

And no one in the UK noticed that Wenlock might have certain... issues?

Rat Boy wrote:
*Legion* wrote:

"Wenlock" and "Mandeville" from Summer 2012 in London.

And no one in the UK noticed that Wenlock might have certain... issues?

14 million Britons suffer from urinary incontinence.

Representation matters.

*Legion* wrote:

Generals - 4:1

Nothing says "winning franchise" like the name Washington Generals.

*Legion* wrote:

Alright, while we wait for Snyder to get his trademark ducks in a row...

What name would *you* pick for Washington?

Current betting odds:

RedTails - 3:1
Generals - 4:1
Presidents - 5:1
Lincolns - 8:1
Veterans - 8:1
Capitols - 9:1
Americans - 10:1
Memorials - 10:1
Monuments - 10:1

Man all of these names are pretty crappy. Lincolns? Monuments? WTF. AMERICANS? Just terrible.

Perhaps the best is Generals. Is there some history about RedTails that I just don't know about? The only Red Tails I know about is in the context of the Tuskegee Airmen, but what does that have to do with Washington DC?

LeapingGnome wrote:

The only Red Tails I know about is in the context of the Tuskegee Airmen, but what does that have to do with Washington DC?

Nothing other than some of the pilots themselves were from DC and thereabout, but it does feel like a stretch. I'm not certain why that one has gotten so much support, and I'm skeptical that it's as strong a competitor as the oddsmakers place it.

AMERICANS? Just terrible.

Well when the local baseball team is called the Washington Nationals, I can see how Americans would get considered. Honestly that one might be underrated in the odds.

Since people shorten Nationals to Nats, I have to believe the Americans would be the 'Murcans.

*Legion* wrote:
Stele wrote:

They should go with Washington Huskies, to confuse everyone.

When the people of Seattle complain, change it to the SuperSonics.

That's just mean!

I'm all in on Red Tails. Red Wolves is good too.

I was trying to think of something that would be offensive to the sort of white person who would complain about the name change, but the best I could come up with was Washington Immigrants.

I was hoping they would change it to the Anacostia Snakeheads

I kinda like Hogs. It's a nod both to one of the best DC teams as well as to politicians and pork barrel spending.

I'd put money on Snyders, tho. If it was good enough for the Cleveland Browns and the Charlotte Bobcats ...

Enix wrote:

I kinda like Hogs. It's a nod both to one of the best DC teams as well as to politicians and pork barrel spending.

I'd put money on Snyders, tho. If it was good enough for the Cleveland Browns and the Charlotte Bobcats ...

Wait. The Bobcats were named after the owner?

DSGamer wrote:
Enix wrote:

I kinda like Hogs. It's a nod both to one of the best DC teams as well as to politicians and pork barrel spending.

I'd put money on Snyders, tho. If it was good enough for the Cleveland Browns and the Charlotte Bobcats ...

Wait. The Bobcats were named after the owner?

Robert L. Johnson.