
A place to discuss the now-global coronavirus outbreak.
Yeah let’s not spread garbage like that.
Wasn't the video talking about how the study was flawed?
Furthermore, N-95s and the like do actually increase your protection. That's why my family still wears them anytime we go into shared indoor spaces.
Zero cases of Covid in our family and that includes our fifth grader, who chooses to still mask and has dodged two different direct exposure clusters at school.
It also failed to acknowledge that people weren't wearing masks 100% of the time, so if you wore a mask at work, but didn't wear one at home or out in stores, you could still get covid while outside of work and that would count that against the mask mandate, despite the fact that you caught it while not wearing a mask. They also didn't touch on people deliberately ignoring mask mandates or how many people were wearing them incorrectly and inconsistently.
It sounds like the study in question was not impartial and so shouldn't be taken seriously anyway, but I don't see how these would be flaws in a more serious study on the matter. It's worth knowing how effective a public health measure is based on real-world implementation, not some imaginary situation where we can guarantee universal compliance and perfect implementation.
They're flaws because of the claim they're trying to use that information to support. Those a salient points if you're talking about problems with mask mandates, but they show that the problem was with people not using masks consistently or correctly, not a problem with the masks themselves. They correctly identify a problem (mask mandates didn't prevent the spread of covid within the area they covered), but draw a faulty conclusion as to what caused it (masks are ineffective at preventing the spread of covid).
LeapingGnome wrote:Yeah let’s not spread garbage like that.
Wasn't the video talking about how the study was flawed?
Yes it was but I think your the only one who watched the video rather than just pile on how bad the study was.
*however it did generate discussion which is good! So don't think I am saying people shouldn't debate it.
kazar wrote:LeapingGnome wrote:Yeah let’s not spread garbage like that.
Wasn't the video talking about how the study was flawed?
Yes it was but I think your the only one who watched the video rather than just pile on how bad the study was.
*however it did generate discussion which is good! So don't think I am saying people shouldn't debate it.
Nah, I watched it too, I've watched previous content from that presenter and it's generally good stuff.
So in Oregon, masks aren’t required except high risk areas of the hospital. It’s BS. So many times I have to tell people you need one on this side of the door. You can be no mask on that side of the door.
It is good thing viruses don't know how to use doors!
Well doors in a hospital like that can actually mean things, like a positive pressure difference, and good seals around the door. Personally, I think high risk areas of a hospital should always require masks, doesn't matter if Covid is around or not.
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo altered an analysis released by the Florida Department of Health last year to suggest mRNA Covid-19 vaccines pose a significant health risk to men ages 18 to 39, Politico reported Monday.
He should lose his medical license.
I hope he and the fl government gets the sh*t sued out of them for wrongful death. The purposefully provided incorrect information that got people killed.
The state should be sued into bankruptcy and Disney should be put in charge of running it.
Remember Rebekah Jones? ...Yeah. About her claims....
Pages