[News] The Internet Was a Mistake

A thread for updates on the various ways the internet is destroying everything and the undying hellsites of social media. Let's all laugh at the abyss.

Over the last few days my youtube was pretty commonly suggesting "Video game is WOKE" or "WOKE game FAILS" videos. I have not watched anything different that would make sense as to why these are all showing up. Then I realized that I watched a couple Black Myth Wukong review videos. I guess the woke wars have tagged those review videos as anti-woke given the number of videos like that?

It was kind of hard to notice them advertising what with all the sex toy ads.

For all the complaints about X it is still seems to be the default for communication.

It’s still too useful for journalists and the shitposters are still enjoying themselves, and those two groups of users are the pillars that prop up the platform and keep everyone else on.

And sports.

But yeah, as awful as Elmo is, the quality of entertainment on Twitter, across multiple genres, is exponentially better/funnier than BSky, which has what I can only describe as "Big Teacher's Pet Energy."

No thanks to any of this junk.

It frustrates me that people I follow/listen to/support are still active on Twitter, or even primarily on Twitter over other platforms. Also, as someone who no longer has an account, the site isn't that functional for me anymore. I can view a directly linked tweet but I can't view anyone's stream in a practical way. I'm just shown whatever tweets are pinned along with a random scattering of their tweets over literally the past few years. It's absolutely bizarre. My primary purpose for viewing someone's profile would be to check in on what they've been up to, maybe track down a recent announcement. But that's no longer possible. Just hurry up and die, please...

French police arrested the founder of Telegram. They plan to charge him with abbetting terrorism, money laundering, fraud and crimes against children, ultimately all due to his refusal to moderate the platform or cooperate with authorities. A lot of noise is being made to suggest that the government wants him to moderate the private messages between users, but in order to do that he'd have to be able to see them, which Telegram can't by design. It's far more likely, though, that the charges will relate to the lack of moderation on public groups, which can have as many as 200k members.

Edit- apparently this has the Russian milbloggers in a bit of a panic, as apparently the Russian military itself communicates quite a bit using Telegram

‘My identity is stolen’: Photos of European influencers used to push pro-Trump propaganda on fake X accounts

Luna, a self-described 32-year-old “MAGA Trump supporter” from the battleground state of Wisconsin, has gained a huge following since she joined X, formerly Twitter, in March. Her timeline has become a digital bullhorn for the “Make America Great Again” movement, praising former President Donald Trump’s re-election bid, promoting conspiracy theories about his opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, and touting Republican talking points to nearly 30,000 followers, who she addresses as “patriots.”

“Would You Support Trump Being The President forever? I wonder if you all support Trump for president just like me,” @Luna_2K24 posted on July 29, sharing a beach selfie in a white bikini and asking her followers to respond with an American flag emoji if they agreed. The post was viewed by around 54,000 people.

But Luna isn’t real. The photos of the smiling brunette posted periodically on @Luna_2K24’s timeline are of Debbie Nederlof, a German fashion influencer who lives across the Atlantic and won’t be voting in the US presidential election in November. When CNN reached out to the 32-year-old, a trained optician and single mother who is working two jobs – as a social media manager at an engineering firm and as a model to raise money for her child – she was angry and frustrated that her face was being used to push pro-Trump propaganda on X.

“To be honest, ‘what the f**k?’ was my reaction. That was my reaction, because I have nothing to do with the United States. With Trump, the political things over there. What the hell do I – from a small place in Germany – care about US politics?” she said.

Nederlof is one of 17 real European women — fashion and beauty influencers from the Netherlands, Denmark and as far away as Russia — whose online photos have been stolen by unknown actors to promote Trump and his pick as running mate, Senator JD Vance of Ohio, on X, a CNN investigation in collaboration with the Centre for Information Resilience (CIR) has found. CIR is an independent, non-profit social enterprise which describes itself as dedicated to exposing human rights abuses. It receives funding for individual projects from governments, NGOs and individuals.

The fake accounts are among 56 profiles on X identified by CNN and CIR, using a mixture of digital sleuthing and reverse image search tools, as appearing to be part of a coordinated campaign backing the Trump-Vance ticket ahead of the 2024 presidential election. There’s no indication that the Trump campaign is involved.

Free speech!

Brazil blocks X after Musk ignores court orders

Somewhere at Google: "hey, hey, do we still have the source code for Orkut?"

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/mlpaFFW.png)

There is absolutely no way I'm clicking on that button.

The stakes of this election get drawn into greater relief upon realizing the one of the world's richest men is paying people to disseminate obviously fake propaganda.

Elon is everything they said Soros was.

The conspiracies around Soros always did sound more like a wishlist than anything else so that tracks

Vulpes Absurda wrote:

The conspiracies around Soros always did sound more like a wishlist than anything else so that tracks

Every accusation is a confession. It’s what they want to do.

Appeals Court Upholds Decision Against Internet Archive’s Book Scanning Program

In a swift decision, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has unanimously affirmed a March 2023 lower court decision finding the Internet Archive's program to scan and lend print library books is copyright infringement. In an emphatic 64-page decision, released on September 4, the court rejected the Internet Archive’s fair use defense, as well as the novel protocol known as “controlled digital lending” on which the Archive’s scanning and lending is based.

“This appeal presents the following question: Is it ‘fair use’ for a nonprofit organization to scan copyright-protected print books in their entirety, and distribute those digital copies online, in full, for free, subject to a one-to-one owned-to-loaned ratio between its print copies and the digital copies it makes available at any given time, all without authorization from the copyright-holding publishers or authors? Applying the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act as well as binding Supreme Court and Second Circuit precedent, we conclude the answer is no,” the decision states.

The closely watched copyright infringement lawsuit was first filed on June 1, 2020, in the Southern District of New York by Hachette, HarperCollins, Penguin Random House, and Wiley, organized by the Association of American Publishers.

The appeals court ruling comes just over two months after a lengthy June 28 hearing in New York, at which the panel appeared highly engaged, if deeply skeptical of the Internet Archive’s case—a relatively quick turnaround that suggests that the court did not struggle in deciding the case, much like district court Judge John G. Koeltl, who delivered his March 24, 2023 summary judgment ruling in favor of the plaintiff publishers just days after a March 20 hearing.

In his now affirmed 47-page opinion, Koeltl forcefully rejected the Internet Archive’s fair use defense. “At bottom, IA’s fair use defense rests on the notion that lawfully acquiring a copyrighted print book entitles the recipient to make an unauthorized copy and distribute it in place of the print book, so long as it does not simultaneously lend the print book,” Koeltl wrote in his opinion granting the publisher plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and denying the Internet Archive’s cross-motion. “But no case or legal principle supports that notion. Every authority points the other direction.”

Advertisers plan to withdraw from X in record numbers

A global survey by market research firm Kantar found that a net 26% of marketers plan to decrease their spending on X in 2025, the biggest recorded pullback from any major global ad platform.

(...)

“Advertisers have been moving their marketing spend away from X for several years,” Gonca Bubani, Kantar’s global thought leadership director for media, said in a statement, adding that “a turnaround currently seems unlikely.”

It already feels like most of the ads on twitter are for conservative politicians, weird investment scams, and apocalypse prepper shit, I can’t imagine what will be left when those pull out.

Sex toys.

ruhk wrote:

It already feels like most of the ads on twitter are for conservative politicians, weird investment scams, and apocalypse prepper shit, I can’t imagine what will be left when those pull out.

Cash for gold!

Reusable catheters.

That stuff is never going away.

But those buyers don't have the deep pockets of publicly traded firms.

It's just a long, slow death.

Male enhancement pills

Elon is going to have to file a lot more lawsuits!

For those of you wondering where the Tucker Carlson on Twitter experience has gone, I am now going to approvingly link The National Review, calling out his Nazi-apologia bullshit.

Hitler Contrarianism Isn’t Brave

As much pushback as Carlson's horseshit got from across the spectrum this week, it's still rather concerning that he is, unquestionably, one of the biggest, most powerful voices on the American right at the moment. (far more than the National Review, which stopped having any meaning to the modern Conservative movement when they didn't kiss Trump's ring).

And he is, at best, a Nazi apologist. And that's not even an exaggeration.

It also bears interest that Elon RT'd the Nazi apologia is likely paying him quite a hefty sum for creating this content on X.

(I wonder if Ben Shapiro is ashamed to have been so spineless as to let Elon use him for a PR apology tour, only for within the year Elon just to once again be chit-chatting with and supporting open anti-Semites, just because Ben hates gay and black people that much?

I mean, he's obviously not, but I still wonder.)

Also, let us give a brief shout-out to his continued purposeful conflation of being barred from having an unpopular opinion to not being mocked and ridiculed for said unpopular opinion.

It's one of the most infruating things online. Someone says something stupid as shit, everyone tells them it's stupid as shit, and then they act like because everyone's yelling at them, they've discovered some truth and everyone else is emotional. Mendacity only matched by its cowardice.

Prederick wrote:

It also bears interest that Elon RT'd the Nazi apologia is likely paying him quite a hefty sum for creating this content on X.

I read this as "Russia Today'd"

Prederick wrote:

Also, let us give a brief shout-out to his continued purposeful conflation of being barred from having an unpopular opinion to not being mocked and ridiculed for said unpopular opinion.

Calling it "being barred" from having an "unpopular opinion" is doing people a massive disservice.

These are not "unpopular opinions". They are flat-out lies. The things that are being said are provably false. We have historical records of the event, and, even more to the point, people who have the events in living memory, and all of these accounts match perfectly when it comes to these particulars.

It's like trying to tell people that JFK wasn't shot, he just had a heart attack. Or the hijackers on the planes on 9/11 were actually British patriots getting revenge for the Revolutionary War. There are certain things about these events that can be logically questioned without making you look completely insane, but these are not among those things.

People are allowed to have unpopular opinions (and, yes, other people are allowed to mock them for having said opinions), but they are just flat out making shit up and spewing it out there like it's some kind of "second opinion", and, no, your made-up bullshit which has zero factual basis behind it whatsoever does not deserve the decency of being referred to as an "opinion", and I for one am down with smacking that kind of behavior down as immediately and harshly as possible.

Rat Boy wrote:

Sex toys.

Wrong thread.

Rat Boy wrote:

Sex toys.

Rat Boy wrote:

Where to find sex toys?

Rat Boy wrote:

Can you delete GWJ posts?

Rat Boy wrote:

How to delete GWJ posts?

Rat Boy wrote:

It appears my GWJ account was hacked. I apologize to anyone that was offended.