[News] Post a D&D Picture

Previous incarnations of Cleveland/P&C/D&D have had an image thread, to handle political cartoons and other image-based stuff that doesn't belong in the general post-a-picture threads.

If any of them spawn an extended discussion, please spawn it off into its own thread. Replies to non-picture replies should take the form of a link pointing to a post on a different discussion thread.

And I shouldn't have to say it, but the images still need to abide by the rules.

Paleocon wrote:
SallyNasty wrote:
Chairman_Mao wrote:
SallyNasty wrote:

please explain

I read it as, the sudden popularity of My Heart Will Go On is the latest in a long chain of events that originate with the writing and publication of Atlas Shrugged.

That's how I read it too, but there must be something more because that reading isn't really that funny.

Sorry I am late, but this is how I chose to explain it to my wife.

Ayn Rand's crappy novels are used as the ideological basis for modern libertarianism which is largely a pseudo-intellectual shine on a mindset that includes selfishness, sociopathic behavior and an allergic reaction to adult responsibility. This is most often expressed in screaming about how seat belts, drunk driving laws, and not being able to dump your used motor oil down the storm drain is "communist". It is a mindset perfectly expressed by Rush's pathological avoidance of certification for his toy submarine.

The inevitable appointment between his hubris and nature at the wreck of the Titanic led to numerous memes including Celine Dion's song from the original movie soundtrack.

Or...
IMAGE(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FyX0XTeXwAAnypO?format=jpg&name=small)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/3IeGb9S.jpeg)

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/ifloxn8qoi8b1.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/HUY7mz7.jpeg)

NSFW bad avocado language.

Spoiler:

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/V5Yy5IY.jpeg)

Always spend, that helps the economy. Not only are you buying the avocados, you are creating a market for assholes to write how bad it is that the kids like to eat avocados.

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/cn6kpqgsas8b1.png)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/50psbf1.png)

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/ad3l2x46ln8b1.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/C34KlBU.png)

And people really think he is a "genius"?

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/0nl8a4g4gn8b1.jpg)

Not just anyone can be that f*cking stupid.

Given his track record for truthfulness and his oddly specific use of the words "legitimate person", I have to wonder if he is, in fact, a sack of arcanely animated gym socks sewn into a skin suit.

farley3k wrote:

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/0nl8a4g4gn8b1.jpg)

That is legit word-for-word the answer that some sort of alien or cryptid would use if it were caught trying to pass itself off as human. “Yes, that’s me, Donald Normalman, legitimate person.”

Greetings, fellow humans!

I read that answer in Alan Tudyk's "Resident Alien trying to pass as human" voice, and it's perfect.

Reminds me of when clips of the Facebook asshole show up on TOTALLYNOTROBOTS.

Trump is the OG LLM.

ruhk wrote:
farley3k wrote:

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/0nl8a4g4gn8b1.jpg)

That is legit word-for-word the answer that some sort of alien or cryptid would use if it were caught trying to pass itself off as human. “Yes, that’s me, Donald Normalman, legitimate person.”

IMAGE(https://scontent-ord5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/65317962_10218956192910898_8301687693109100544_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=6KkLb4UZ0mMAX9vW3kK&_nc_ht=scontent-ord5-2.xx&oh=00_AfCSUh8Ysmr4J9FB9lZimBNTcDhpXMc13MzDQs6s_fMTGg&oe=64C507CA)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/1FY1FyC.jpeg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/15R0uO6.png)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/cu9vIP0.jpeg)

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/s5xcitzhdt8b1.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.postimg.cc/1XX2SCXf/IMG-3932.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.postimg.cc/XJ7DKHwQ/IMG-3934.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.postimg.cc/jS4pzJpq/IMG-3933.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.postimg.cc/brKPVtC3/IMG-3935.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.ibb.co/vqp4ZJT/F872-EEE4-1249-45-AF-8302-41-D71-F6-A4-AB4.webp)

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/3g3qe5kpv1ab1.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/rqdeD0z.jpeg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/HMqkOPp.jpeg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/PYJ8VgN.jpeg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/bjds3NT.jpeg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/cXDLxn3.jpeg)

They aren't mad at being called bigots because they are bigots. They're mad at being called bigots because they want bigotry to be normalized.

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/XNmuVZ7.jpeg)

Why can't people learn the difference between "hanged" and "hung"?

How do I get *in* the LGBTQ+, anyway? Is... Is there a newsletter? Do I have to wrestle a bear?

...tell me I have to wrestle a bear...

Robear wrote:

How do I get *in* the LGBTQ+, anyway? Is... Is there a newsletter? Do I have to wrestle a bear?

...tell me I have to wrestle a bear...

well... You may want to do some internet research on that definition.

Turns out that the fake marriage web designer who got the Moore v. Turner decision made in the SCOTUS allowing bigotry against gay folks lied about the case entirely. The person she said she refused service to: 1) never asked for a website from her, 2) is not gay, 3) is hetero and married already, and 4) is a professional web designer himself.

The SCOTUS did precisely what Chief Justice John Roberts stated it would never do: make a ruling based on a hypothetical with no injured party. It has, by definition, made an unconstitutional decision.

JC wrote:

well... You may want to do some internet research on that definition.

...I know what I said... I'm not threatened by forest animals.

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/w272UgJ.jpeg)

Paleocon wrote:

Turns out that the fake marriage web designer who got the Moore v. Turner decision made in the SCOTUS allowing bigotry against gay folks lied about the case entirely. The person she said she refused service to: 1) never asked for a website from her, 2) is not gay, 3) is hetero and married already, and 4) is a professional web designer himself.

The SCOTUS did precisely what Chief Justice John Roberts stated it would never do: make a ruling based on a hypothetical with no injured party. It has, by definition, made an unconstitutional decision.

I reached into my Elie Mystal quotebook and pulled out this one:

The only time conservative white men have agreed to share power is when other white men make them do it at the point of a gun. And whenever those more enlightened whites lose the will and the nerve to keep stuffing equality and fairness down the throats of their objecting brothers and cousins, conservative forces retrench, recalibrate and reemerge with new strategies to violently reassert white male dominance, and new legal theories to justify their supremacy.
JC wrote:
Robear wrote:

How do I get *in* the LGBTQ+, anyway? Is... Is there a newsletter? Do I have to wrestle a bear?

...tell me I have to wrestle a bear...

well... You may want to do some internet research on that definition.

For some it's a couger.

Mixolyde wrote:
Paleocon wrote:

Turns out that the fake marriage web designer who got the Moore v. Turner decision made in the SCOTUS allowing bigotry against gay folks lied about the case entirely. The person she said she refused service to: 1) never asked for a website from her, 2) is not gay, 3) is hetero and married already, and 4) is a professional web designer himself.

The SCOTUS did precisely what Chief Justice John Roberts stated it would never do: make a ruling based on a hypothetical with no injured party. It has, by definition, made an unconstitutional decision.

I reached into my Elie Mystal quotebook and pulled out this one:

The only time conservative white men have agreed to share power is when other white men make them do it at the point of a gun. And whenever those more enlightened whites lose the will and the nerve to keep stuffing equality and fairness down the throats of their objecting brothers and cousins, conservative forces retrench, recalibrate and reemerge with new strategies to violently reassert white male dominance, and new legal theories to justify their supremacy.

And here’s why

This problem is a lot older and more systemic.