shoptroll wrote:But what if we want the results in XML? ;)
Then your data format preferences are bad and you should feel bad!
This is my favorite post.
For those interested in the nitty gritty:
Spoiler:Previously results have been collected manually.
This will no longer be the case in the boogle future, and a standard list format will be imposed to facilitate collecting data.
Then I'm going to post raw and summarized json files containing the data.
Well there go my dreams of hardcore statistical analyses resulting in novel inferrences.
For those interested in the nitty gritty:
Spoiler:Previously results have been collected manually.
This will no longer be the case in the boogle future, and a standard list format will be imposed to facilitate collecting data.
Then I'm going to post raw and summarized json files containing the data.
While I can understand the advantage in a standardize list, I feel that the risk is that the GOTY thread would lose a lot of its flavor. The fun part of this thread is writing up a list, explaining the wherefore and why, someone is use screenshots or link to the box art. With a standard list, you run the risk of having this thread become a bunch of "filled my list!" posts. But that's just how I see things.
You'll just have to adhere to a formatting standard.
Comments, screenshots, links, etc will be permitted.
Thanks for all your effort, Clock. I watched the thread largely silently and was always impressed with your even-handedness in disputes and conversations that got more heated than the subject matter merited.
Well there go my dreams of hardcore statistical analyses resulting in novel inferrences.
And now I want to gather all the past data, sanitize, and run some models. I've got a dissertation to write now, but after May, perhaps I'll revisit with whatever raw data are available.
Maybe the statistical analysis could take into account word count of the write ups to help calculate score multipliers.
(Of course I'm kidding.)
Maybe the statistical analysis could take into account word count of the write ups to help calculate score multipliers. :twisted:
I could finally get a game up on the top 10!!!
Spoiler:(Of course I'm kidding.)
... or are you?!?!?
doubtingthomas396 wrote:Spoiler:(Of course I'm kidding.)
Spoiler:... or are you?!?!?
Maybe the statistical analysis could take into account word count of the write ups to help calculate score multipliers. :twisted:
Also, pun count.
Also, pun count.
Good luck with the NLTK classifier.
Jonman wrote:Also, pun count.
Good luck with the NLTK classifier.
I'm sure he can at least put in a token effort. He's a classy guy.
Jonman wrote:Also, pun count.
Good luck with the NLTK classifier.
Classifier? I 'ardly know 'er!
The 2017 Community Game of the Year thread is now live.
Shoot I totally forgot to vote this year
Edit: oops this year voting just opened
Pages