One can't say that this isn't the double negative thread.

Neither can one thus conclude that this is neither a triple negative nor a quadruple negative thread. As a matter of fact, not one of the ideas expressed here should fail to qualify as one containing multiple negatives. To write a sentence that isn't in the negatives in some respect would be a failure to avoid injustice.

No it wouldn't.

You can't say that without substantial amount of uncertainly.

Thirteenth wrote:

You can't say that without substantial amount of uncertainly.

Yes I can't.

I don't know whether or not anyone will comment on this, but it doesn't seem out of the question. Although maybe not.

Thirteenth wrote:

To write a sentence that isn't in the negatives in some respect would be a failure to avoid injustice.

Don't you think that's a bit overly negative of you?

Nuh-uhh

This certainly isn't the un-greatest thread I don't not want to not read excepting when I just don't want to not read it or don't not not read it unless it is or isn't not being not read by others or not not read to me by a not dressed french maid.

One can't say that this isn't the double negative thread.

...but two can.

Nomad wrote:
One can't say that this isn't the double negative thread.

...but two can.

IMAGE(http://reason.com/assets/mc/jsullum/2011_04/toucan-sam.gif)

I can't say I don't approve of this thread

kyrieee wrote:

I can't say I don't approve of this thread

Don't say I didn't warn you!

Was it not Grenn who wrote:

a not dressed french maid.

I won't say I can't not stop thinking about this.

I would never not possibly even consider maybe in any potential way undoing the things I may or may not have undone.

My days of not taking you all seriously are certainly coming to a middle.

This thread is not dissimilar to an odd form of stuttering or Tourette's. No, I will not allow myself to have left this thread untagged.

IMAGE(http://i51.tinypic.com/zsrcr6.png)

This isn't not just contradiction!

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

I'm not tagging this.

This thread has failed to meet my lack of expectations of what it wasn't intended to not fail to be.

clover wrote:

I don't know whether or not anyone will comment on this, but it doesn't seem out of the question. Although maybe not.

Thirteenth wrote:

To write a sentence that isn't in the negatives in some respect would be a failure to avoid injustice.

Don't you think that's a bit overly negative of you?

I wouldn't necessarily disagree with that, but not until more time has passed shall we stop refraining from evaluating the degree of negativity I'd chosen not to keep unexpressed.

I can't say my mind isn't boggled by this lack of no thread not being non-complicated.

This thread is only visible on Wednesdays, and Sundays, after sundown when the Carebears magically appear and start to eat cat food. If they eat dog food, however, This thread will be visible for a whole week.

Ow, my brain.

The following statement is not untrue: this thread isn't the least comfortable one I've ever had the displeasure of ignoring.

Isn't it untrue that lack of space mightn't be an issue? Doesn't it not have to be a negative?

I was not unsurprised to find my negative assumptions of this thread contradicted.

I am not, but I completely am.

ColdForged wrote:

The following statement is false: the previous statement is false.

FTFM

IMAGE(http://us.cdn2.123rf.com/168nwm/photonut61/photonut610610/photonut61061000007/571756-two-negatives-on-white-with-clipping-path.jpg)

IMAGE(http://1.media.collegehumor.cvcdn.com/3/4/collegehumor.fa83c1e3d57cd55682049f242a14345d.jpg)

-1 to this thread.

It had to not be said