I need some advice

Coldstream wrote:
MyNameIsHunter wrote:
wordsmythe wrote:

A were-useless is only useless on a full moon.

:(

Don't worry. Getting chastised by Wordie means that you're truly a member of our community now. :D

Aww, someone accepts me.

Coldstream wrote:
MyNameIsHunter wrote:
wordsmythe wrote:

A were-useless is only useless on a full moon.

:(

Don't worry. Getting chastised by Wordie means that you're truly a member of our community now. :D

It's like a right of pasage.

Jonman wrote:
Coldstream wrote:
MyNameIsHunter wrote:
wordsmythe wrote:

A were-useless is only useless on a full moon.

:(

Don't worry. Getting chastised by Wordie means that you're truly a member of our community now. :D

It's like a right of pasage.

I see what you did there.

wordsmythe wrote:

A were-useless is only useless on a full moon.

No, no, he was saying that the kids were useless. I'm not sure how or why they aren't now, but it's perfectly valid to say that they used to be.

wordsmythe wrote:

A were-useless is only useless on a full moon.

Completely ridiculous. Everyone knows that the moon holds no sway over the were-useless. The fact that they post on 4chan at night has nothing to do with the lunar cycle. That's just fear and myth straight out of the early 90's. Or, "The Dark Ages."

Does that mean that you can only kill fornicating kids with a silver bullet?

Grenn wrote:
wordsmythe wrote:

A were-useless is only useless on a full moon.

Completely ridiculous. Everyone knows that the moon holds no sway over the were-useless. The fact that they post on 4chan at night has nothing to do with the lunar cycle. That's just fear and myth straight out of the early 90's. Or, "The Dark Ages."

So that's why the 4channers all have hairy palms?

Paleocon wrote:

Does that mean that you can only kill fornicating kids with a silver bullet?

If you're referring to the marital aid...

Hunter, you want to win an argument with your dip-sh*t brother? This is the technique I use to win arguments with my wife: Agree with them and then explain why they are wrong.

"Yes, you're right, that game is pretty good. The only part that bothers me is blah blah blah, don't you think? And I can't believe they put blah blah blah in it too. But other than that. It's a great game. Oh yeah, the part with blah blah blah sucks too. Great game though. I can see why you like it."

Marsman wrote:

Hunter, you want to win an argument with your dip-sh*t brother? This is the technique I use to win arguments with my wife: Agree with them and then explain why they are wrong.

"Yes, you're right, that game is pretty good. The only part that bothers me is blah blah blah, don't you think? And I can't believe they put blah blah blah in it too. But other than that. It's a great game. Oh yeah, the part with blah blah blah sucks too. Great game though. I can see why you like it."

Devious. I can't really blame you for taking that route, though, with a woman who will play with very scary-looking spiders so easily.

This thread is delivering the win.

In other news, I have way too much time on my hands these days.

Find a bored janitor, preferably wise looking, and ask him to train you

Chumpy_McChump wrote:
wordsmythe wrote:

A were-useless is only useless on a full moon.

No, no, he was saying that the kids were useless. I'm not sure how or why they aren't now, but it's perfectly valid to say that they used to be.

I thought about that. The kids were useless, but now it seems that The Kids Are Alright.