Firefly - Love it!

This image is (a) awesome and (b) begging for an "Angelina Jolie's Leg" photoshop.

IMAGE(http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web04/2012/3/1/11/enhanced-buzz-29432-1330617668-39.jpg)

davet010 wrote:
Veloxi wrote:

*gets a bucket for my drool*

Christina in spandex, and all you need is a bucket ? I guess that's one way to announce to the world that you're coming out of the closet ;)

Understatement is a form of humor, asshat. Now stand still while I dump these mere BUCKET of ticks down your pants.

Ah never mind, probably fake

edit: Oh, whatever, here it is, is it real? NSFW obviously

http://thegodofhellfire.tumblr.com/p...

Mex wrote:

Ah never mind, probably fake

edit: Oh, whatever, here it is, is it real? NSFW obviously

http://thegodofhellfire.tumblr.com/p...

That's not just a little bit NSFW by the way. Here there be nipples.

Mex wrote:

Ah never mind, probably fake

edit: Oh, whatever, here it is, is it real? NSFW obviously

http://thegodofhellfire.tumblr.com/p...

Real enough anyway.

Dear. God.

And the thread was inactive until the end of time.

No head, it's not her. That is some voluminous oogaba, however.

BadKen wrote:

No head, it's not her. That is some voluminous oogaba, however.

Voluminous Oogaba is the name of my Meatloaf cover band.

Ms. Hendricks speaks out about questionable pics.

The fact that the pics are now missing makes me wonder if they were, in fact, legit.

Might we suggest to her that she actually unveils the real twin moons for, y'know, comparison purposes ?

Malor wrote:

The fact that the pics are now missing makes me wonder if they were, in fact, legit.

The ones where she wasn't topless were real, the topless ones are questionable.

davet010 wrote:

Might we suggest to her that she actually unveils the real twin moons for, y'know, comparison purposes ?

It would have been great if she simply said "Oh no the real ones are far more amazing."

Something I always find fascinating is that even though both sides know exactly what the other side has, the whole obsession with seeing the genuine article, as though someone is presumed not to have nipples (or something) unless they prove it.

Scratched wrote:

Something I always find fascinating is that even though both sides know exactly what the other side has, the whole obsession with seeing the genuine article, as though someone is presumed not to have nipples (or something) unless they prove it.

Which is odd as I suffer form a condition known as Schrodinger's Nipples; I only have nipples when I have to prove it.

(obi-wan)
These are not the nipples you are looking for.
(/obi-wan)

Oso wrote:

(obi-wan)
These are not the nipples you are looking for.
(/obi-wan)

No. They are. They really are.

I'm not sure even Yoda could pull that mind trick.

I think her boobs have gotten too big. Just saying not everyone likes boobs that big.

I still love how, as a young model, she got an invite to a party Johnny Depp was throwing. Thought "well that's just not appropriate, I don't even know him." and flogged the invite for grocery money.

Quintin_Stone wrote:

I think her boobs have gotten too big. Just saying not everyone likes boobs that big.

Glad someone brought that up. Don't get me wrong, she's still something else but yeah...at least for me, there's a limit.

Parallax Abstraction wrote:
Quintin_Stone wrote:

I think her boobs have gotten too big. Just saying not everyone likes boobs that big.

Glad someone brought that up. Don't get me wrong, she's still something else but yeah...at least for me, there's a limit.

There IS a limit, and I would appreciate it if y'all donated to my Kickstartered research into just where it is. I think I'm gonna need about $50k, and I will promise not to draw a salary, selflessly giving of my own time. Research will include extensive visual, digital, and lingual examination of a large number of test subjects as we define the limit by attempting to go past it.

Fedaykin98 wrote:
Parallax Abstraction wrote:
Quintin_Stone wrote:

I think her boobs have gotten too big. Just saying not everyone likes boobs that big.

Glad someone brought that up. Don't get me wrong, she's still something else but yeah...at least for me, there's a limit.

There IS a limit, and I would appreciate it if y'all donated to my Kickstartered research into just where it is. I think I'm gonna need about $50k, and I will promise not to draw a salary, selflessly giving of my own time. Research will include extensive visual, digital, and lingual examination of a large number of test subjects as we define the limit by attempting to go past it.

You for tactile.

Fedaykin98 wrote:
Parallax Abstraction wrote:
Quintin_Stone wrote:

I think her boobs have gotten too big. Just saying not everyone likes boobs that big.

Glad someone brought that up. Don't get me wrong, she's still something else but yeah...at least for me, there's a limit.

There IS a limit, and I would appreciate it if y'all donated to my Kickstartered research into just where it is. I think I'm gonna need about $50k, and I will promise not to draw a salary, selflessly giving of my own time. Research will include extensive visual, digital, and lingual examination of a large number of test subjects as we define the limit by attempting to go past it.

Need a lab assistant?

I will do the filming, so the financial backers can see where their money went....

You want to film the money shot for Fedaykin's experimentation?

Tigerbill: There are digits, and then there are digits.

Slacker1913 wrote:
Fedaykin98 wrote:
Parallax Abstraction wrote:
Quintin_Stone wrote:

I think her boobs have gotten too big. Just saying not everyone likes boobs that big.

Glad someone brought that up. Don't get me wrong, she's still something else but yeah...at least for me, there's a limit.

There IS a limit, and I would appreciate it if y'all donated to my Kickstartered research into just where it is. I think I'm gonna need about $50k, and I will promise not to draw a salary, selflessly giving of my own time. Research will include extensive visual, digital, and lingual examination of a large number of test subjects as we define the limit by attempting to go past it.

Need a lab assistant?

That's only for the $1,000 tier. And I'm calling dibs.

Parallax Abstraction wrote:
Slacker1913 wrote:
Fedaykin98 wrote:
Parallax Abstraction wrote:
Quintin_Stone wrote:

I think her boobs have gotten too big. Just saying not everyone likes boobs that big.

Glad someone brought that up. Don't get me wrong, she's still something else but yeah...at least for me, there's a limit.

There IS a limit, and I would appreciate it if y'all donated to my Kickstartered research into just where it is. I think I'm gonna need about $50k, and I will promise not to draw a salary, selflessly giving of my own time. Research will include extensive visual, digital, and lingual examination of a large number of test subjects as we define the limit by attempting to go past it.

Need a lab assistant?

That's only for the $1,000 tier. And I'm calling dibs. :)

How much for the documentary video?

I remember when this thread was about firefly.