2004 forecast as best year economically in 2 decades

2004 Will Be the U.S.'S Best Year Economically in Last 20 Years, The Conference Board Reports in a Revised Forecast:

NEW YORK, Dec. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- Revising its year-end economic forecast sharply upward, The Conference Board today projected that real GDP growth will hit 5.7% next year, making 2004 the best year economically in the last 20 years.
The forecast, by Conference Board Chief Economist Gail Fosler, expects worker productivity, which set a 20-year record in the third quarter, to rise at a healthy 3.6% next year. That would follow a gain of 4.3% this year.

The economic forecast is prepared for more than 2,500 corporate members of The Conference Board's global business network, based in 66 nations.

KEY BAROMETERS FLASHING GROWTH

"Growing business spending and continued strength in consumer spending are generating growth throughout the U.S. economy," says Fosler. "This burgeoning strength is reflected in The Conference Board's widely-watched Leading Economic Indicators, the Consumer Confidence Index and the Help-Wanted Advertising Index. While the labor market, a critical factor in sustaining growth, is growing slowly, a pick-up in hiring may already have begun."

Real consumer spending, which continues to fuel growth, will increase at a 4.7% pace next year, up from about 3.2% this year. Another gain of 4.3% is projected for 2005.

While the U.S. economy is expected to generate more than one million new jobs next year, the unemployment rate will edge down only slightly, averaging 5.6% in 2004.

The Conference Board forecast notes that as the U.S. economy bounces back, so is Europe, although growth will be subdued compared to most other major parts of the world. "For all the concern about a weak dollar," says Fosler, "the dollar will be worth more than the euro by the end of the year."

Real capital spending, which will rise by only 2.7% this year, will climb 11.7% next year and another 8.6% in 2005. Pre-tax corporate operating profits will top $1 trillion next year, up from a projected $928 billion this year. Another trillion-dollar-plus gain in profits is expected in 2005.

The continued recovery in business profits, which was a key ingredient in funding new investment (crucial in making 2004 a strong growth year), depends on price relief. Business profits will benefit from both improved volume and recovering profit margins in 2004, as inflation creeps back toward 3% by the end of the year.

Sucks if you're using the bad economy as a major point in your Presidential campaign.

Well as much as people scream and shout about how great the economy and recovery is, people in the Bay Area have yet to see one table scrap of it.

It would be interesting to see if other areas around the country are in the same situation.

Well as much as people scream and shout about how great the economy and recovery is, people in the Bay Area have yet to see one table scrap of it.

Oh my God! San Francisco may not vote for Bush now!

What''s good for GWB is that there are already signs that the economy is coming back big time, look at internet holiday sales this year, but GWB is still going to take heat on the thousands and thousands who don''t have jobs yet.

I think George Bush can win even if he doesn''t get the votes from the 5.9 percent of the population who can''t seem to find a job in a booming economy. Let them vote for Dean, he needs the support.

People in the Bay Area can thank the former Governor Gray Davis for their plight.

People in the Bay Area can thank the former Governor Gray Davis for their plight.

He has a large part in the play no doubt.

So far the new guy hasn''t done much better.

Edit: ""Today we had a meeting where we discussed whether or not to pave a road! And then we talked about building a park in Santa Barbara, but we don''t have the money!""

So far the new guy hasn''t done much better.

More proof that liberals have less patience than the average two year-old...

"ralcydan" wrote:

More proof that liberals have less patience than the average two year-old...

No, it just means we''re results-oriented.

"Lawyeron" wrote:

I think George Bush can win even if he doesn''t get the votes from the 5.9 percent of the population who can''t seem to find a job in a booming economy. Let them vote for Dean, he needs the support.

People in the Bay Area can thank the former Governor Gray Davis for their plight.

I think you have to blame the culture of Sacramento for the past decade for the situation.

No, it just means we''re results-oriented.

And yet you were against the recall... You sure about that position?

"ralcydan" wrote:
So far the new guy hasn''t done much better.

More proof that liberals have less patience than the average two year-old...

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-budget10dec10,1,5862572.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Since that''s a (free) registration required site I''ll post the first paragraph:

Retreating from two central campaign promises that helped make him governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday dropped his personal ""guarantee"" that cities and counties would be compensated for billions in lost car-tax revenue and reversed his pledge to safeguard spending for public schools.

I think the honeymoon is over.

More proof that liberals have less patience than the average two year-old...

No, it just means we''re results-oriented.

That''s an interesting view. If that is the case, then why are all of these sweeping social policies proposed by liberals open-ended and free from scrutiny of their effectiveness? Matter of fact, how is that ''cash for panhandling'' policy in SF working for the liberals that live there?

Methinks JMJ has a point.

Matter of fact, how is that ''cash for panhandling'' policy in SF working for the liberals that live there?

Currently dead thanks to the courts, who think it isn''t an issue that can be voted on in an election. The new mayor should get this off the ground in the Board of Supervisors.