Doctor Shopping - Rush Ordered

Since Rush isn''t being ""targeted"" I guess we''ll soon see Ozzy facing jail time and watch as his medical records are subpoenaed...

From Yahoo / AP

What''s that? Prosecutors aren''t looking into filing charges against Ozzy because he was a user who became addicted while in the care of a doctor? Weird.

British-born Osbourne and his wife, Sharon, said they fired the doctor in August after paying $650,000 in medical bills since June 2002.

Holy smokes Batman! Obviously we need universal health-care!

Holy smokes Batman! Obviously we need universal health-care!

Yeah, why shouldn''t we all be footing this bill for Ozzy? Who knows if he even has medical insurance, and we all know that anyone without medical insurance must need government subsidies.

I can at least see where your coming from about Rush, Ralcydan. You can thank JohnnyMojo and his ""intent"" explaination for explaining it for you.

My magic bubble gum wrapper needs more mana.

I can at least see where your coming from about Rush, Ralcydan. You can thank JohnnyMojo and his ""intent"" explaination for explaining it for you.

Yeah, sometimes you need smaller words to get a point across Thanks for making the thread ""more accessible"" Johnny!

Yeah, sometimes you need smaller words to get a point across Thanks for making the thread ""more accessible"" Johnny!

Actually, the lack of abusive language was quite helpful.

Actually, the lack of abusive language was quite helpful.

I''m not sure what you found abusive. You stated that Rush Limbaugh''s position is that he would like to see liberals put in labor camps, sterilized, and killed by the trainload. That is a ridiculous position, so I ridiculed it. Seems like an appropraite response to me.

...so I ridiculed it. Seems like an appropraite response to me.

Can''t argue with that. You are Rush aren''t you. 8)

Slick, its cool, let it go now. There will just be a dozen more posts back and fortha rguing semantics and phrasing.

Once you get to the point where they attack your source or use personal attacks against you. You''ve ""won"" if there is such a thing in these arguments. You made them budge and that small victory is all you can hope to accomplish.

Once you get to the point where they attack your source or use personal attacks against you. You''ve ""won"" if there is such a thing in these arguments. You made them budge and that small victory is all you can hope to accomplish.

An interesting position from you Fang, in this specific case. I would think you to be against people using the holocaust in inane rhetorical references that only water down one of the true evils in history by comparing it to partisan punditry...

I would think you to be against people using the holocaust in inane rhetorical references that only water down one of the true evils in history by comparing it to partisan punditry...

I must have missed that. Who did what where?

Slick''s complaint was that I gave him a hard time over this statement:

"Slick" wrote:

By the way my opinions are based on more than just his view on drug abuse. He just replaces the term liberal or democrat where a fascist would have used jew.

Well then we should correct him. As much as I dont agree with Rush''s sentiments he''s not a fascist. Thankfully, not all fascists hate Jews either. So it would seem he needs to find a better analogy.

Fang, I disagree with you on so many things... But I want you to know I find you eternally consistent and utterly honest. Just wanted to get that out.

We can now go back to annoying one another.

We can now go back to annoying one another.

I have never known a better man to infuriate me and make me laugh (often at the same time) than you.

Shhh - we''ll make Rat jealous...

You guys are right on that, already. I withdraw said holocaust statement.

"ralcydan" wrote:

Shhh - we''ll make Rat jealous...

Hmmmm, and they both have cat icons...