Questions you want answered.

Marsman wrote:
RedJen wrote:
Marsman wrote:

A little Google-Fu turned up this gem.

Q: What is the most complicated question ever?

A: What you just asked.

Why?

Because.

But whyyyyyyyyuh?

muttonchop wrote:
Marsman wrote:
RedJen wrote:
Marsman wrote:

A little Google-Fu turned up this gem.

Q: What is the most complicated question ever?

A: What you just asked.

Why?

Because.

But whyyyyyyyyuh?

Because I'm the daddy and I said so, damn it!

Why not?

Clemenstation wrote:

Why not?

That's it! I've had it. Upstairs! In your room and close the door. I don't want to hear a peep out of you until I call you down. MOVE IT!!

It's not like this at Jeff's house. His dad doesn't ground him for no reason.

Grenn wrote:

It's not like this at Jeff's house. His dad doesn't ground him for no reason.

Fine! Go live at Jeff's house if you want to. I'm sure his parents would love another back-talking brat to take care of. But as long as you live under my roof, you abide by my rules, Buster. Got it?

Fine, but I'm putting the deadbolt on the door!

Your avatar is a spoiler for people only at strip 550 by the way. O'Chul escapes!?

Clemenstation wrote:

O'Chul escapes!?

Shhhhh!!!! It's a secret.

Marsman wrote:
Clemenstation wrote:

Why not?

That's it! I've had it. Upstairs! In your room and close the door. I don't want to hear a peep out of you until I call you down. MOVE IT!!

Can I use the bathroom?

This thread almost made me spray orange juice all over the desk.

EDIT: Okay, I thought of a question. Why has the SciFi channel renamed itself "SYFY"?? It is the most ridiculous and fireable idea I have ever heard come out of that place...and they show Uwe Boll movies unironically.

VDOWhoNeedsDD wrote:

This thread almost made me spray orange juice all over the desk.

EDIT: Okay, I thought of a question. Why has the SciFi channel renamed itself "SYFY"?? It is the most ridiculous and fireable idea I have ever heard come out of that place...and they show Uwe Boll movies unironically.

We talked about this here. The consensus seems to be that they wanted a name they could patent.

Oh, thanks. Didn't check, bad VDO.

adam.greenbrier wrote:

We talked about this here. The consensus seems to be that they wanted a name they could patent.

Trademark, not patent.

evilseed wrote:

Why is there a watermelon there?

I'll tell you later.

Quintin_Stone wrote:
adam.greenbrier wrote:

We talked about this here. The consensus seems to be that they wanted a name they could patent.

Trademark, not patent.

Wow, yes. I can't believe I wrote "patent" there. Thanks for the correction.

Any Zooey Deschanel fans care to explain the appeal?

adam.greenbrier wrote:

Any Zooey Deschanel fans care to explain the appeal?

Big eyes, weird interests, deadpan sense of humor.

adam.greenbrier wrote:

Any Zooey Deschanel fans care to explain the appeal?

Hot + nutso = great in the sack

I can sum it up in one word, attainable.

A quick Google turned up that Zooey is quite cute. No idea who she is, but she sure is a doll. Her sister is pretty cute too.

Emily and Zooey
IMAGE(http://www.celebszz.com/24691-2/emily-deschanel-03.jpg)

Her sis is Bones? I didn't know that.

I think Zoey is cute, she's got those luminous blue eyes, and she's a got a nice singing voice. I don't think she's much of an actress.

Evolutionarily, large eyes are a sign of both youth, trustworthiness and high estrogen levels. That's probably why she's so much more attractive than her squinty sister.

I wouldn't kick either out of bed for eating crackers.

Marsman wrote:

I wouldn't kick either out of bed for eating crackers.

I get it!

adam.greenbrier wrote:

Any Zooey Deschanel fans care to explain the appeal?

The eyes, the husky voice, the fact that there is just something a little different about her. And, as someone wrote, she has a good singing voice.

Quintin_Stone wrote:

Her sis is Bones?

I'll say!

hurrr

Sometimes I forget the simplest of things. For example, this morning I was eating an omelet and for about 5 seconds I just could not for the life of me remember how to use a knife and fork, it was like they were alien tools that I'd never seen before. It came back to me real fast, but it's kind of odd.

I guess the question is; brain tumor?

Serengeti wrote:

Sometimes I forget the simplest of things. For example, this morning I was eating an omelet and for about 5 seconds I just could not for the life of me remember how to use a knife and fork, it was like they were alien tools that I'd never seen before. It came back to me real fast, but it's kind of odd.

I guess the question is; brain tumor?

Were you really tired or something?
I mean, the answer could be yes, I guess, but it seems like it was just a brain fart.

Serengeti wrote:

Sometimes I forget the simplest of things. For example, this morning I was eating an omelet and for about 5 seconds I just could not for the life of me remember how to use a knife and fork, it was like they were alien tools that I'd never seen before. It came back to me real fast, but it's kind of odd.

I guess the question is; brain tumor?

Do you still remember asking this question? If not, it's Alzheimer's.

Can someone help me figure out Gmail's label system?

I'm trying to apply filters so that various emails go into various folders... err, labels. The problem is, I can't seem to make a filter *move* an email to a label automatically. Every new message shows up in my inbox, though with the label next to it. I have to manually select messages and manually move them to the folders I wanted them to go into in the first place, which to me sort of defeats the whole purpose of the system.

Is there a way to make a filter move new messages that satisfy the specified conditions instead of just labeling them?

Puce Moose wrote:

Can someone help me figure out Gmail's label system?

I'm trying to apply filters so that various emails go into various folders... err, labels. The problem is, I can't seem to make a filter *move* an email to a label automatically. Every new message shows up in my inbox, though with the label next to it. I have to manually select messages and manually move them to the folders I wanted them to go into in the first place, which to me sort of defeats the whole purpose of the system.

Is there a way to make a filter move new messages that satisfy the specified conditions instead of just labeling them?

Not that I've seen. This is why I gave up on labeling a long time ago. If I need an e-mail, I just search.