A thread for news stories about the ongoing global migrant crisis.
Oh that too certainly. Rereading my comment I can see how it may be interpreted as victim-blaming, but that is not my intent at all. Rather, it's meant as a criticism to us in the US for the callous (at best) way we treat people who have had to go to such dire lengths to escape horrific conditions.
Switch: SW-5816-4534-9106
Farscry wrote:I do catch myself wondering how many people who are trying so hard to get to the US realize just how shamefully we will treat them once they're here? :(
I wonder how horrible conditions are in their original country that what we offer is better.
What the US offers is the US Dollar and plentiful jobs. I remember seeing an article once that said like 1 in 8 people on the planet are supported by money sent home by migrants working in wealthier countries. Obviously that’s not all from the US, but the Dollar is still strong against most other currencies in the world.
EDIT: quick googling found this article from UN News saying it’s 1 in 9 people, or around 800 million people.
Migrant caravan in southern Mexico marks Christmas Day by trudging onward
HUIXTLA, Mexico (AP) — Christmas Day meant the same as any other day for thousands of migrants walking through southern Mexico: more trudging under a hot sun.
There were no presents, and Christmas Eve dinner was a sandwich, a bottle of water and a banana handed out by a local church to some of the migrants in the town of Álvaro Obregón, in the southern state of Chiapas, which borders Guatemala.
Migrants spent Christmas night sleeping on a scrap of cardboard or plastic stretched out under an awning or tent, or the bare ground.
In the morning, it was waking as usual at 4 a.m., to get an early start and avoid the worst of the heat, walking to the next town, Huixtla, 20 miles (30 kilometers) away.
Karla Ramírez, a migrant from Honduras who was traveling with other adults and four children, got to Álvaro Obregón too late Sunday to get any of the food being given out by the church. So they had to buy whatever little they could afford.
“It was sad: we have never, ever been in the street before,” Ramírez said. “Our Christmas dinner was some mortadella, butter and tomato, with a tortilla.”
Mariela Amaya’s seven-year-old son didn’t understand why they had to spend Christmas this way. Amaya, also from Honduras, tugged the hand of her tired, recalcitrant son as they walked.
“They don’t understand why we have to do this to get a better life,” Amaya said. Nor did the governments of Mexico and the United States, she said.
“Why can’t they help us? We need their help,” she said.
What little help there was came from local families, one of whom gave out tamales — traditional seasonal fare — and water to the passing migrants.
The migrants included single adults but also entire families, all eager to reach the U.S. border, angry and frustrated at having to wait weeks or months in the nearby city of Tapachula for documents that might allow them to continue their journey.
Mexico claims it doesn’t give out transit visas, but migrants keep hoping to get some sort of document so they could at least take buses to the border.
“This journey has been really hard for us migrants. We need the (Mexican) immigration office and the government to have some pity on us, and give us a safe conduct pass,” said Jessica García, a migrant from Venezuela.
Mexico says it detected 680,000 migrants moving through the country in the first 11 months of 2023.
At around 6,000 people, the migrant caravan that set out Sunday was the largest one since June 2022, when a similarly sized group departed Tapachula.
And like the 2022 caravan — which started as U.S. President Joe Biden hosted leaders in Los Angeles for the Summit of the Americas — this year’s Christmas caravan came a few days before U.S. officials are to meet with their Mexican counterparts in Mexico City to explore ways of stemming the number of migrants showing up at the U.S. southwest border.
The Mexican government has already said it is willing to help try to block migrants from crossing Mexico; the government had little choice, afte r U.S. officials briefly closed two vital Texas railway border crossings, claiming they were overwhelmed by processing migrants.
That put a chokehold on freight moving from Mexico to the United States, as well as grain needed to feed Mexican livestock moving south. The rail crossings have since been reopened, but the message was clear.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is expected to arrive in Mexico City Wednesday to hammer out new agreements to control the surge of migrants seeking entry into the United States. The U.S. delegation will also include Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and White House homeland security adviser Liz Sherwood-Randall.
This month, as many as 10,000 migrants were arrested per day at the U.S. southwest border.
In May, Mexico agreed to take in migrants from countries such as Venezuela, Nicaragua and Cuba who had been turned away by the U.S. for not following rules that provided new legal pathways to asylum and other forms of migration.
But that deal, aimed at curbing a post-pandemic jump in migration, appears to be insufficient as numbers rise once again, disrupting bilateral trade and stoking anti-migrant sentiment among conservative voters in the U.S.
Arrests for illegal crossing topped 2 million in each of the U.S. government’s last two fiscal years, reflecting technological changes that have made it easier for migrants to leave home to escape poverty, natural disasters, political repression and organized crime.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Biden mulls border crackdown in face of Trump’s migrant-bashing rhetoric
Heading into the heat of the 2024 election season, Joe Biden is weighing major changes to US immigration policy that would toughen border enforcement and address an issue that has emerged as one of the president’s biggest political vulnerabilities ahead of a likely rematch against his anti-immigration rival Donald Trump.
But it is also a risk for Biden, who entered the White House in 2021 promising to “restore humanity and American values to our immigration system” after Trump’s four-year crackdown on immigration.
Shortly after being sworn in, Biden set to work unwinding his Republican predecessor’s immigration policies and, at the same time, sent Congress a sprawling legislative proposal that included pathways to citizenship for millions of immigrants living in the US.
That aspirational legislation landed with a resounding thud on Capitol Hill, where Democratic leaders had little appetite for a political scrap over the perennially thorny issue of immigration reform. But the politics of immigration have shifted sharply to the right since then, leaving Democrats – and the president – in a political bind as they negotiate with Republicans over border measures they once denounced.
Exceptionally high levels of migration at the southern border with Mexico – and withering Republican attacks on the president’s response – have vaulted immigration to the fore. On Wednesday, the US secretary of state, Antony Blinken, met with Mexico’s president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, for talks aimed at limiting migrants reaching the US south-western border.
A bipartisan group of Senate lawmakers have been engaged in talks with the White House over a border deal that would unlock aid to Ukraine and Israel.
“We all know there’s a problem at the border – the president does, Democrats do,” Chuck Schumer, the Senate majority leader, said before sending senators home for their holiday recess. “Our goal is to get something done as soon as we get back.”
But for many Democratic officials, immigration activists and progressive leaders, the dramatic changes Biden is considering to asylum law and border enforcement are nearly indistinguishable from the policies of his predecessor. They argue that the US has a humanitarian responsibility to provide refuge to the millions of migrants fleeing violence, poverty and natural disasters.
“A return to Trump-era policies is not the fix. In fact it will make the problem worse,” the California senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat, said in a speech on the steps of the Capitol earlier this month, in which he urged the president to oppose Republicans’ border security proposals. “Mass detention, gutting our asylum system, Title 42 on steroids. It is unconscionable.”
Yet for many Americans, especially Republicans, the upswing in undocumented migrants arriving at the southern border is an urgent concern.
Nearly half of US adults said tightening security at the US-Mexico border should be a “high priority” for the federal government, according to an AP-NORC poll. Meanwhile, surveys consistently show deep, cross-party dissatisfaction with Biden’s handling of immigration and border security.
In a December Wall Street Journal poll, 13% of voters ranked immigration and the US-Mexico border as their top issue, second only to concerns about the economy. It found voters disapproved of Biden’s handling of the border by a more than two-to-one margin. And asked who voters believed would better handle the issue, 54% said Trump compared with 24% who said Biden – by far the widest spread between the two candidates of all the issues tested.
It marks a reversal from the Trump years, when voters tended to give Democrats the edge on immigration and largely rejected Republican efforts to stoke fear over migration.
Democrats have long struggled to articulate a cohesive, proactive immigration agenda. Their divisions over how to fix the nation’s tattered immigration system faded during the Trump years, as the party united against his immigrant-bashing rhetoric and hardline policies. In 2020, Biden campaigned on a promise to reverse Trump’s approach.
But as record numbers of undocumented immigrants arrive at the border, and seek shelter in cities hundreds of miles away, Biden is under pressure from Republican critics and Democratic allies to address a problem that both parties now agree has reached “crisis” levels.
“It is a very dangerous moment politically that this White House is operating in,” said Vanessa Cárdenas, executive director of America’s Voice, a pro-immigration group.
Cárdenas said the answer was not to “cave” to Republican demands but to double down on the administration’s “unprecedented” efforts to expand legal immigration pathways and work permits.
She acknowledged the limitations of what Biden can achieve through executive action, but urged the president to be “bold” or risk further alienating core Democratic constituencies, such as young people and progressives.
“This administration needs to show that they’re willing to [do] something meaningful for immigrant communities,” she said. “Unless they do that, it’s going to be really hard for people who care about immigration and immigrant rights to vote for them.”
But the president appears willing to gamble that a deal with Republicans on border security will do more politically to help than hurt. Those who agree say supporters of immigrant rights are unlikely to back Trump, whose policies they abhor, and will likely be motivated to turn out by other issue such as abortion and democracy.
“As far as the Democrats are concerned, this is a big liability,” said Ruy Teixeira, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and co-author of, Where Have All the Democrats Gone? “They would be wise to start trying to undo some of the damage here.”
In focus groups, Teixeira says voters, including Latinos, express deep anxieties about migration and view the border as “out of control”. He said Biden needed to stop worrying about the blowback from immigrant rights groups and progressives and start boasting about the actions his administration is taking to stem the flow of migrants, such as building a section of Trump’s wall.
“To simply do it and then shamefacedly allude to it every once in a while and say your hands are tied, it’s the worst of both worlds,” he said. “He gets attacked by the left of his party and voters have no idea what he did.”
Earlier this year, a number of Republican governors began bussing and flying thousands of migrants from their states, especially Texas, to Democratic-led cities such as New York, Washington and Chicago, a tactic condemned by immigrant rights groups as inhumane and nakedly political. But it also highlighted the strain facing US cities, where Democratic officials say an influx of migrants has overwhelmed shelters, schools and hospitals.
In recent months, several Democratic mayors and governors have called on the White House to step up its federal response to what the Illinois governor, JB Pritzker, called a “national humanitarian crisis”.
After a three-month rise that approached all-time highs, arrests for illegal crossings along the southern border fell 14% in October before ticking up again in November, according to US Customs and Border Protection data.
Despite concerns about the border, a July Gallup poll found that two-thirds of Americans still consider immigration a good thing for the country. And Democrats note that Republicans are demanding new restrictions on legal immigration as economists say the US needs more workers to address labor shortages.
“We need workers. We need a workforce. We’ve got to be competitive in the future,” Congresswoman Veronica Escobar, a Texas Democrat, said recently. “Immigrants make us better.”
For much of his presidency, Biden described the wave of migration to the US as a hemispheric challenge, with rising violence, economic crises and political upheaval pushing millions of migrants to America’s borders. In response, the Biden administration has pursued a combination of new legal pathways for immigrants to enter the country with more restrictions for those who cross the border illegally.
Aspects of the approach have earned praise from immigrant rights groups. But some have also accused the administration of policy “whiplash”.
This year, the Biden administration extended temporary legal status to nearly 500,000 Venezuelans who arrived in the US before 31 July, fleeing the economic and humanitarian crisis in their home country. Weeks later, the US announced it was resuming deportation flights to Venezuela. The move, which sparked fierce backlash from immigrant rights groups, came after border agents arrested more Venezuelans than Mexicans for the first time.
The Biden administration also recently announced that it had no choice but to build up to 20 miles of barriers along the border with Mexico, breaking a campaign pledge not to build another foot of Trump’s border wall. The administration, which waived more than 20 federal laws and regulations to allow for the construction of barriers in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley, said it had no choice in the matter because the funds had already been authorized by Congress during Trump’s presidency.
On the campaign trail, Biden is focusing on his rival. The president recently condemned Trump’s demonizing rhetoric, including nativist comments that undocumented immigrants were “poisoning the blood of our country” and a vow to be a dictator on “day one” to close the southern border with Mexico. His campaign has also seized on reports that Trump is planning an even harsher immigration crackdown if elected to a second term with plans that include mass deportations and detention camps.
Meanwhile, the White House says Trump’s immigration policies are to blame for creating some of the backlog that is overwhelming immigration courts. Officials also argue that Congressional Republicans have stood in the way of requests to fund more border patrol agents, social workers, judges and court officials.
But those arguments have so far failed to resonate with voters who believe the president has done little to address the problem. If the border talks between the Senate and the White House are successful, the White House hopes it will enable Biden to show progress on an issue that’s dogged his presidency.
Some Democrats are skeptical. They accuse Republicans of negotiating in bad faith, saying they are only interested in weaponizing the issue, not addressing it. Cárdenas said Republicans won’t stop attacking Biden on immigration, even if he meets their border enforcement demands.
“The goalposts always get moved,” she said. “And then you’re stuck with policies that don’t even address the problem in the first place.”
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Students in Indonesia protest the growing numbers of Rohingya refugees in Aceh province
There's video, which is... sigh.
BANDA ACEH, Indonesia (AP) — Students in Indonesia’s Aceh province rallied on Wednesday, demanding the government drive away Rohingya refugees who have been arriving by sea in growing numbers. The protest came as police named more suspects in human trafficking of refugees.
Over 1,500 Rohingya — who fled violent attacks in Myanmar to subsequently leave overcrowded refugee camps in neighboring Bangladesh in search of a better life elsewhere — have arrived in Aceh, on the tip of the island of Sumatra, since November. They have faced some hostility from fellow Muslims in Aceh.
About 200 students protested in front of the provincial parliament in Banda Aceh, the capital of Aceh, calling on lawmakers to turn away the Rohingyas, saying their presence would bring social and economic upheaval to the community.
“Get out Rohingya,” the protesters chanted. Many criticized the government and the United Nations refugee agency for failing to manage the refugee arrivals. Some protesters burned tires on the street.
“We urged the parliament speaker to immediately take a firm action to remove all Rohingya refugees from Aceh,” said Teuku Wariza, one of the protest organizers.
The protesters marched to a local community hall in Banda Aceh, where about 137 Rohingya are taking shelter. The demonstrators threw out clothes and household items belonging to the refugees, forcing authorities to relocate them to another shelter.
Footage obtained by The Associated Press shows a large group of refugees, mostly women and children, crying and screaming as a mob, wearing university green jackets, is seen breaking through a police cordon and forcibly putting the Rohingya on the back of two trucks.
The incident drew an outcry from human rights group and the UNHCR, which said the attack left the refugees shocked and traumatized.
“UNHCR reminds everyone that desperate refugee children, women and men seeking shelter in Indonesia are victims of persecution and conflict, and are survivors of deadly sea journeys,” the agency said in a statement released late Wednesday.
The statement called on local authorities to urgently act to protect the refugees and humanitarian workers.
Indonesia had once tolerated the refugees while Thailand and Malaysia pushed them away. But the growing hostility of some Indonesians toward the Rohingya has put pressure on President Joko Widodo’s government to take action.
Earlier in December, Widodo said the government suspected a surge in human trafficking for the increase in Rohingya arrivals.
Also Wednesday, police in Banda Aceh named two more suspected human smugglers from Bangladesh and Myanmar, following the Dec. 10 arrival of another boat with refugees. One of the suspects, the boat’s captain, himself a refugee, was charged with trafficking.
“This is not an easy issue, this is an issue with enormous challenges,” Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi told reporters.
About 740,000 Rohingya were resettled in Bangladesh after fleeing their homes in Myanmar to escape a brutal counterinsurgency campaign carried out in 2017 by security forces. Accusations of mass rape, murder and the burning of entire villages are well documented, and international courts are considering whether Myanmar authorities committed genocide and other grave human rights abuses.
Efforts to repatriate the Rohingya have failed because of doubts their safety can be assured. The Rohingya are largely denied citizenship rights in Buddhist-majority Myanmar and face widespread social discrimination.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Ambulance Workers in Texas Are Reeling Under the Border Surge
(NYT Paywall)
Through the long, busy months of autumn, the calls kept coming in: Mothers losing grip of their children while trying to cross the treacherous waters of the Rio Grande. Pregnant women getting caught in barbed wire. Bodies washing up on shore.
Cities like New York and Chicago have struggled in recent months to accommodate the busloads of migrants arriving during the latest surge in migration. But here on the border, the small town of Eagle Pass, Texas, has been one of several cities facing an even more difficult challenge. Up to 5,000 migrants a day were crossing the border there from Mexico during the height of the influx in recent weeks, gathering along the river, running through people’s yards and looking for help.
Many are in urgent need of medical attention when they arrive — help that is only available through a city that is already straining to meet the needs of its own 28,000 residents. The city has had to assign one of its five ambulances full time to transport injured migrants from the river’s edge.
“A lot of the attention is directed to the big cities and the disagreement between politicians and not the boots on the ground here in Eagle Pass,” Manuel Mello III, the Eagle Pass fire chief, said this week as a delegation of 60 Republican congressmen, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, gathered in town at the edge of the Rio Grande to call for the Biden administration to stem the immigration surge.
“Our communities are overrun,” Mr. Johnson told reporters on Wednesday. “They have opened the border wide to the entire world.”
An estimated 300,000 migrants were apprehended along the southern border in December, a record, prompting the temporary closure of four international crossings, including one in Eagle Pass.
Texas has long been at the center of U.S. immigration policy, with some of the largest levels of arrivals in recent years occurring in El Paso and across the Rio Grande Valley. But the area has turned into a key point of friction this year between Republican leaders and the Biden administration, as Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas has openly defied federal authority and set up state law enforcement patrols, concertina wire and floating buoys along the border in a bid to keep new migrants out of the state.
On Wednesday, the Justice Department filed suit challenging a new Texas law that gives state police officers authority to arrest and turn back migrants and is set to go into effect in March.
Governor Abbott is continuing to send migrants to northern cities, but local officials on the border say they are the ones being overwhelmed by the thousands of migrants arriving at their doors, especially emergency departments called to respond when there is trouble.
In Eagle Pass, most calls are for migrants who underestimate the strong currents of the river and disappear under the water. Others are for people injured trying to cross through the barbed wire that the state installed over the objections of federal authorities, pregnant women in distress, heat exhaustion, hypothermia and various minor injuries.
The Fire Department responds to an average of 217 such calls a month, a significant number for a crew of about 50 paramedics and emergency medical technicians. “We were seeing drownings almost every day,” Chief Mello said. “We are being overwhelmed.”
The department is spending about $150,000 a month on ambulance costs responding to migrants alone, a cost that is normally covered by patients or health insurers but not in the case of migrants, the chief said. That figure does not include overtime, which is costing more than $30,000 a month, and the costs of replacing equipment and medicine.
“But what’s the solution?” Chief Mello said. “Not to respond to calls? That would be inhumane. Our job is to save lives.”
The Fire Department is not the only local agency feeling the strain. The Eagle Pass police chief, Federico Garza, says his small police force of 74 officers is often diverted from everyday duties to respond to calls of migrants idling on a corner or crossing through a back yard. The sheer number of calls “can be overwhelming” he said.
Local officers are expected to turn over migrants to the U.S. Border Patrol. But those dynamics may change in March when the new state law takes effect and local officers are empowered to conduct more widespread migrant arrests, a provision that the Justice Department says unconstitutionally usurps federal authority.
Chief Garza has his own concerns about the law. He said his officers were not trained to deal with migrant encounters, and no one from the state had reached out to provide training and resources.
“Are we going to add border patrols? Those are the answers I’m waiting for,” he said. “My deal is to keep the city safe and avoid interference with them crossing and interfering with our citizens,” he added, referring to the migrants.
Leandro Gonzalez, 32, a longtime resident of Eagle Pass who lives near the Rio Grande, says he sees hundreds of people who cross into the city and wait in clusters to be picked up by Border Patrol officers near his home. They leave behind piles of debris, clothing and discarded plastic, he said. “That’s been happening for a few years now. You don’t know who they are,” he said. “You feel unsafe.”
After the record-setting numbers in recent months, there have been some signs of a decline. Apprehensions decreased to about 2,500 on Jan. 1 from 10,000 on a single day in December, according to government officials. Rolando Salinas Jr., the mayor of Eagle Pass, said his city had recently seen less than 500 in recent days.
“But that’s happened before, right? When you have several days of very little people and then all of a sudden, you have a big surge,” Mr. Salinas said. “I hope we don’t go back to seeing 4,000 or 5,000 people. That’s what creates chaos.”
The reasons for the recent slowdown are unclear, though it appears that one factor may be new steps that Mexico has taken to curb migration after the U.S. secretary of state, Antony J. Blinken, and other top American officials urged Mexico’s president, Manuel López Obrador, to intervene. Since then, Mexican officials have set up checkpoints to intercept a large caravan making its way north and have also begun deporting Venezuelan migrants, which lately have made up a large portion of new arrivals to the United States.
U.S. authorities have also stepped up deportations, with more than 460,000 migrants, including 75,000 families with children, flown to their home countries since May.
The drop-off in crossings has already lifted a weight off the town of Eagle Pass, Mr. Salinas said. The recent closure of an international crossing known locally as Bridge 1 crippled a local economy that benefits from a steady stream of Mexicans who legally cross every day to eat at restaurants, fill their gas tanks and commute to work. The closure over the holiday season cost the city about $1 million, Mr. Salinas said.
The bridge reopened at 7 a.m. on Thursday. Other crossings that had been temporarily closed were also reopening, in San Ysidro, Calif., Nogales, Ariz., and Lukeville, Ariz.
Mr. Salinas said he received a personal call this week from the Homeland Security secretary, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, about plans to reopen the bridge.
“That last thing that we want is for a bridge to be closed,” Mr. Salinas said. “That impacted local people and our pocketbooks.”
He said he also hoped the visit this week by House Republicans would put pressure on the president and Democrats to agree to stricter immigration policies.
But the emergency crew members at the Eagle Pass fire station said they did not have time to wait for the politicians in Washington to act, with lives at stake.
Harish Garcia, 27, an emergency medical technician, shared a harrowing story from the fall. During the most recent surge, he said, his crew responded to a call of a mother and daughter, about 4 or 5 years old, who were not breathing after trying to cross the Rio Grande. Mr. Garcia said he helped perform C.P.R. on both victims, loaded them into an ambulance and took them to a hospital.
He said he saw it as a win, after hearing that “they had made it.” But listening to his story, Chief Mello interjected. Both had perished later at the hospital, he informed him.
Mr. Garcia cast down his eyes. “We see it almost every day here,” he said. “It’s tough on us. But we lean on each other. It’s part of the job. We help who we can and then we have to get everything back in service and be ready for the next call.”
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Biden Faces Pressure on Immigration, and Not Just From Republicans
(Also NYT Paywall)
President Biden is under growing pressure to curb record numbers of migrants crossing into the United States — not just from the usual Republican critics, but also from Democratic mayors and governors in cities thousands of miles from the border.
What used to be a clear-cut, ideological fight between Democrats and Republicans has become a bipartisan demand for action, and some of the most intense pressure on Mr. Biden is coming from places like Boston, Denver, Chicago and New York, where leaders in the president’s own party are issuing cries for help.
Publicly, the Democratic politicians have described mounting crises in their cities. Privately, they are in almost daily contact with Tom Perez, director of the White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs, and other administration officials. For the most part they are not calling for the kind of severe border restrictions that Republicans are demanding, but they want help with overflowing migrant encampments, packed shelters and busted budgets.
The intraparty pressure has turned the politics of immigration upside down at the beginning of a campaign year. And it has increased the likelihood that Mr. Biden and Democratic lawmakers will approve immigration concessions to Republicans that would have seemed improbable just a few years ago.
In Denver, more than 36,000 migrants have arrived in recent months, with 4,100 still in city shelters, and more are arriving daily. In Boston, migrants have camped out at the airport. In New York, more than 164,500 migrants have poured into shelters since April 2022, with many still living in one of the 215 hotels, converted office buildings or tent camps set up to accommodate them.
“It’s both a humanitarian and fiscal crisis,” said Mike Johnston, the Democratic mayor of Denver. “We aren’t going to sit by and watch moms and 6-month-olds in tents on the streets in 10-degree weather. But by refusing to do that we are on the path to spend $180 million next year and could not do that either.”
“As mayors we are so frustrated,” he added, noting that many of the migrants arriving in his city must wait for months before they can work legally in the United States. “This is actually a solvable problem, if we had work authorization, federal dollars and a coordinated entry plan.”
The flood of migrants into the big cities has been anything but coordinated.
Most have arrived, unannounced, on buses or planes sent by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, who argues that cities far from the border should get a taste of the flood of migrants in his state. Democratic mayors have lashed out at Mr. Abbott for what they say is a political stunt, using human beings as props.
So far, the stunt seems to have worked, by delivering the migrants — often without coats, or family members in the U.S. — to the cities far to the north.
Mayor Eric Adams of New York filed a lawsuit on Thursday against 17 charter bus companies seeking $708 million in compensation for transporting migrants from Texas to the city without paying “for the cost of continued care in violation of New York’s Social Services Law.” Last week, the mayor issued an executive order that requires buses with migrants to arrive in the city only between 8:30 a.m. and noon, Monday through Friday, or face fines and impoundment. Many buses have diverted to cities in New Jersey instead.
In Denver, Mr. Johnston was at one of the city’s migrant encampments on Wednesday, feeling upbeat that his team was transferring all 300 people, including some children, out of the cold and into shelters and apartments.
But even as the process was underway, several new busloads of migrants from the border arrived, courtesy of Mr. Abbott.
“They literally pulled in as we were moving people from this encampment,” Mr. Johnston said in an interview.
A record number of people worldwide are fleeing conflict, climate change, political turmoil and economic hardship in their homelands, according to the United Nations, and smuggling networks have expanded their reach to Asia and Africa.
Nearly 2.5 million people crossed the southern border in fiscal year 2023. In December, more than 10,000 migrants were intercepted at the southern border on some days, among the most ever. Many of them are boarding Mr. Abbott’s buses, hoping to find housing and work in the cities.
The anger at Mr. Abbott — and the frustration with the issue — is shared by Mr. Biden’s top aides, who regularly lash out at the Texas governor and other Republicans. On Wednesday, after Speaker Mike Johnson and 60 House Republicans gathered at the border to rail against the president and his immigration policies, the president’s spokeswoman shot back.
Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House press secretary, called the trip to the border the latest in a series of “political stunts” and accused Republicans of blocking “any efforts for the president to deal with the border. That’s what we’ve seen. That is what we’ve seen from the speaker.”
White House officials say they have been in constant contact with the Democratic mayors and governors to try to help them deal with the impact of the migrants. Mr. Perez spends close to 50 percent of his time on the issue, according to a senior administration official familiar with his efforts.
“The president is focused on securing additional resources,” Mr. Perez said, “including more Border Patrol agents, asylum officers and immigration judges; more technology to catch fentanyl; and more grant funding for communities hosting recently arrived migrants.”
The federal government has already delivered about $1 billion to the cities most affected, including about $50 million of a promised $150 million to New York City. Mr. Biden has also asked Congress for another $1.4 billion to help cities around the country deal with migrants, but that emergency funding is tied up in debates on Capitol Hill.
Mayors and governors say it wouldn’t be enough anyway.
New York has already spent $3.1 billion on housing and feeding the migrants. Massachusetts has spent $247 million on emergency housing since July, and half of the current occupants are migrants. San Diego County allocated $3 million in October for a transition day center for migrants, and another $3 million in December. Denver, Chicago, Los Angeles and other cities across the country are also spending millions.
Since August 2022, more than 600 buses have dropped migrants off in Chicago and its surrounding suburbs, and for months, migrant families have camped out in police stations or in tents on sidewalks.
In recent weeks, Mayor Brandon Johnson’s administration has largely removed migrants from police stations and moved them to the 27 shelters throughout the city. More than 14,000 migrants are currently staying in shelters; Chicago has received nearly 30,000 migrants in just over 14 months.
In a New Year’s Eve interview, Mayor Johnson assailed Mr. Abbott’s actions but also renewed pressure on the Biden administration to send billions of dollars to the cities affected.
“What we have is clearly an international and federal crisis that local governments are being asked to subsidize, and this is unsustainable,” he said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” “None of our local economies are positioned to be able to carry on such a mission.”
On Capitol Hill, a solution to the problem remains elusive.
Republicans have seized the moment to insist on new, severe restrictions to asylum and other immigration policies that Democrats have resisted for years. Lawmakers in both parties say they want more funding for border security but so far have been unable to reach agreement on how much and what it would be spent on.
Caught in the middle are some of Mr. Biden’s top foreign policy priorities: military funding to help Ukraine resist Russian aggression, along with money for Israel as it conducts a war against Hamas following the terror attacks on Oct. 7. Republicans have held up both priorities as border negotiations continue.
But the pressure on Mr. Biden is clearly having an effect on the legislative negotiations. White House officials have signaled that they are open to changes that would make it harder for asylum seekers to pass an initial hurdle, known as a credible fear interview. If that happens, more of them will be returned home more quickly.
Democratic negotiators, including Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary, also have appeared willing to discuss new rules that will allow more rapid deportations of migrants living illegally in the United States far from the border.
That would be a huge departure from the positions taken by most Democrats in the opening days and months of Mr. Biden’s presidency. But as the mayors and governors have made clear, the dynamics have changed.
“States like Massachusetts are in desperate need of more support from the federal government to address this historic surge in migrant arrivals,” said Gov. Maura Healey of Massachusetts, a Democrat. “We need Congress to act on President Biden’s budget that includes critical funding for border security and for cities and states like ours.”
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
How much of this crisis could be mitigated by Biden taking a page out of Reagan's playbook and granting amnesty to people who have been here since 20xx? That could remove the need for work vouchers and lessen the strain on the immigration beauraucracy pretty significantly.
It's just so galling to hear complaints about immigrants when there is a constant supply of 'Help Wanted' signs, jobs going unfilled, shortages of critical workers; but we have literally millions of people who want to come to America and take part in what we have. I realize that adding more people to cities that are already short on housing, or more specifically housing that people can afford, is the biggest immediate threat with winter coming, but it shouldn't be impossible to either build housing or come up with ways to incentivize private industry to make more housing affordable.
The amount of 'Not In My Back Yard' everywhere is so gross, people are afraid that letting people move in to their neighborhoods will lower housing prices, and increase school rosters too much, need to get over it. I would love to see tax assessments get raised so significantly that people feel better about their house 'losing value'. I want schools to be funded so that they can have fewer than 30 kids to a room. Maybe we could hire some immigrants to add-on to schools and be teachers?
This is exactly what how I feel. These immigrants are a massive labor pool we should be using, not persecuting. While I hate that our economy is based on 'perpetual growth', and we are already seeing the issues arising from that, an injection of willing workers will at least slow down some of the problems. Plus there is the increase in tax revenue, which could help improve services for everyone.
Instead, we're treating these people as less than human, and make things harder for them. Not to mention the unintended consequences such as the first responder story posted by Prederick. It's disgusting. It makes me despair of ever reaching the Star Trek society that works for everyone, not just 'us' vs. 'them'.
It makes me despair of ever reaching the Star Trek society that works for everyone, not just 'us' vs. 'them'.
Just remember, it took a literal nuclear war in Star Trek 'history' before people started coming together to form the Federation.
Well, now I have that to look forward to.
Just remember, it took a literal nuclear war in Star Trek 'history' before people started coming together to form the Federation.
Well, now I have that to look forward to.
You can also look forward to the Bell Riots, theoretically starting this September in a San Francisco Bay Area near you!
("near" being relative to the size of the galaxy)
Maybe we should draw a distinction between having a good education and having a lot of education.
oilypenguin wrote:(to Strangeblades) You're like this terrifying ball of horror wrapped in a lanky polite package.
Brooklyn high school receives bomb threat after sheltering migrants during storm
A Brooklyn high school that housed nearly 2,000 migrants for one night during a powerful rainstorm received a bomb threat and multiple “hate calls,” the city’s top emergency management official said Wednesday.
The threats came amid a wave of outrage among some residents, Republican politicians and even the richest man in the world, Elon Musk, over the decision to house the migrants at James Madison High School in Marine Park after they were evacuated Tuesday afternoon from a nearby tent shelter at Floyd Bennett Field.
“These actions are not only deplorable, they are also criminal offenses,” said Zach Iscol, the city’s emergency management commissioner, during a virtual briefing. “This administration stands united against any hate or intimidation.”
He did not provide further details about the nature of the threats.
The migrants were back at the shelter at the former federal airfield by 4:15 a.m. Nevertheless, the school operated via remote learning Wednesday, fueling anger among some elected officials and parents who said the migrant crisis was coming at the expense of students.
“Let’s be clear about one thing: Remote learning equals no learning,” City Councilmember Vicki Paladino said in a statement.
State Assemblymember Michael Novakhov of Brooklyn promoted a protest outside the school slamming the city’s “decision to prioritize migrants over our communities, budget, safety, and even the education of our children.”
Videos posted to social media captured an ugly scene at James Madison on Tuesday evening as the city bused migrants to the school.
“How does it feel that you kicked all the kids out of school tomorrow?” a woman who identified herself as “an aggravated mother” yelled at migrant families.
Elon Musk, who owns the social media platform X, formerly Twitter, and is worth $245 billion, also weighed in.
“This is what happens when you run out of hotel rooms,” he wrote on the platform. “Soon, cities will run out of schools to vacate. Then they will come for your homes.”
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Biden seizes on tougher border measures as he tries to fend off Trump attacks
President Joe Biden is embracing tougher border measures, including shutting down the US-Mexico border, marking a stark shift from his early days in office as he tries to fend off former President Donald Trump’s attacks on immigration policy ahead of the election.
Hours after House Speaker Mike Johnson warned on Friday that the emerging border deal in the Senate is “dead on arrival,” Biden offered this message to House Republicans: “Securing the border through these negotiations is a win for America. For everyone who is demanding tougher border control, this is the way to do it. If you’re serious about the border crisis, pass a bipartisan bill and I will sign it.”
Biden took office pledging to restore asylum and manage the border in a “humane” way. But his administration has faced the harsh realities and challenges at the US-Mexico border amid record migration across the Western hemisphere — making it a political vulnerability seized on by Republicans.
In recent weeks, Trump has lobbied Republicans both in private conversations and in public statements on social media to oppose the border compromise being delicately hashed out in the Senate because he wants to campaign on the issue this November.
Over the course of his administration, Biden has leaned on more restrictive measures to try to stem the flow of migration, but Friday’s statement revealed a tougher stance as the president tries to control an issue that’s dogged him, while risking putting him at odds with some allies.
“(The compromise) would give me, as President, a new emergency authority to shut down the border when it becomes overwhelmed. And if given that authority, I would use it the day I sign the bill into law,” Biden’s statement said.
Biden’s embrace of an authority that would allow him to shut down the border in the event of a migrant surge was striking to current and former administration officials, as well as to immigrant advocates.
Under the soon-to-be-released package, the Department of Homeland Security would be granted new emergency authority to shut down the border if daily average migrants crossing unlawfully reach 4,000 over a one-week span. Certain migrants would be allowed to stay if they proved to be fleeing torture or persecution in their countries.
The details remain unclear. But the authority is reminiscent of a Covid-era border restriction invoked by Trump in 2020 that allowed authorities to turn migrants away at the border. It resulted in more repeat border crossers and still placed a strain on the immigration system.
Immigrant advocates quickly slammed Biden over his statement — revealing the deepening rift between the president and the advocacy community.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Could go in several threads, but gonna put this here, for now:
Speaker Mike Johnson to House GOP: Senate immigration deal ‘absolutely dead,’ members say
Speaker Mike Johnson privately told House Republicans the Senate’s bipartisan immigration deal has “no way forward,” according to lawmakers who attended a closed-door meeting Tuesday – the latest blow to a major national security package intended to unlock critical aid to Ukraine as former President Donald Trump urges Republicans to kill it.
Leaving their conference meeting, House Republicans said Johnson made clear the immigration deal is “absolutely dead.”
“I just heard Speaker Johnson saying it’s absolutely dead, which is what I wanted to hear,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia told CNN. “As a matter of fact, he said so clear, ‘I don’t know why people keep asking me about it,’ because as it stands right now, there’s no way forward.”
Rep. Roger Williams of Texas added that Johnson, “said it’s not going anywhere.”
The House GOP’s warning to the Senate comes as Trump has called on Congress to tank the border deal as he rails against chaos at the border in his fight for the White House. Democrats and even some Republicans believe that Trump is simply trying to preserve a potent campaign issue and deny President Joe Biden a legislative achievement by derailing a deal cut by one of the most conservative senators, James Lankford of Oklahoma.
At a news conference later on Tuesday, Johnson denied pushing to kill the Senate border deal in order to help Trump on the campaign trail, but the speaker said that he has spoken to Trump “at length.”
“No, Manu, that’s absurd,” Johnson told CNN. “I have talked to former President Trump about this issue at length and he understands that we have a responsibility to do here.”
Johnson added, “The president of course, President Trump, wants to secure the country. President Trump is the one that talked about border security before anyone else did. He ran on, as you remember, building the wall. Why? Because he saw this catastrophe coming. He knew that if we did not get control of it, we would be in this situation.”
Attacks on the Senate compromise have ramped up from House Republicans and Trump now that negotiators have a deal in hand, though final text of an agreement has not yet been released. The House GOP push to kill the deal puts aid to Ukraine in peril at a key moment in its fight against Russia and underscores Trump’s strong hold over the conference as well as the stark divide between House and Senate Republicans.
Senate negotiators have agreed to empower the US to significantly restrict illegal migrant crossings at the southern border, according to sources familiar with the matter, a move aimed at ending the migrant surge that has overrun federal authorities over the past several months.
Biden said in a statement on Friday the deal that Senate negotiators have worked toward is both tough and fair.
“What’s been negotiated would – if passed into law – be the toughest and fairest set of reforms to secure the border we’ve ever had in our country,” he said. “It would give me, as President, a new emergency authority to shut down the border when it becomes overwhelmed. And if given that authority, I would use it the day I sign the bill into law.”
But House Republicans have dismissed the deal, insisting that any border security legislation must closely mirror HR 2, a hardline conservative immigration bill that is dead on arrival in the Democrat-controlled Senate. Trump, meanwhile, has argued that Republicans should not accept any kind of compromise and said on Monday that a bill is not necessary.
The attacks from House Republicans and Trump have set up a major contrast with the Senate where Lankford has been one of the key negotiators working to get a deal and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has repeatedly stressed the importance of continuing aid to Ukraine in its war against Russia.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Denver nears its breaking point as migrants and the cold pile in
This is what an overwhelmed city can look like: a preschooler sleeping under a bridge for a month; crowds lining up each night to get food and shelter; and the mayor calling out for help. And when that city is Denver in the winter, and the overnight temperatures sink below zero degrees Fahrenheit, the problems are life-threatening.
“Our city is really struggling,” Mayor Mike Johnston told CNN after he visited families in a makeshift encampment – a sign of the unfolding emergency triggered by the mass arrival of people from outside the city.
“This is both a humanitarian crisis for the individuals that are arriving, and it’s a fiscal crisis for the cities that are serving. Those two crises are coming to a head right now.”
Few, if any, of the thousands of people who have arrived in Denver planned for Colorado’s capital to be their destination after monthslong treks away from persecution or deprivation in search of safety and a chance at the American Dream.
But when Texas Gov. Greg Abbott decided to offer free bus rides to get asylum seekers out of his state, the options given were generally New York, Chicago or Denver, migrants said. Each of those three cities has a Democratic mayor and Abbott has targeted them as part of his stated aim for “the rest of America (to) understand what is going on.” Migrants told CNN they had heard New York was too full, believed Chicago would be too cold and thus picked Denver.
The mayors of New York, Chicago and Denver have issued joint calls for the arrivals of migrants to be treated as a national problem with a national solution. They have called for a coordinated entry system, but Abbott’s spokesperson told CNN in December the only fix was for President Joe Biden’s administration to “secure the border.”
Texas has sent 15,700 people to Denver since May. Initially, many were Venezuelans applying for asylum who had “Temporary Protected Status” under a federal program that allows people from some crisis-hit countries to live and work legally in the United States for a period of time. The city was able to help get the migrants on their feet and soon, they were self-sufficient members of the community, Johnston said.
The Biden administration expanded the TPS program in September after demands for action by New York City, but it still only applies to Venezuelans who arrived in the US before August 1, and most of the newer arrivals in Denver do not qualify. Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has not signaled if he plans further expansions.
Adriana, who did not give her last name, said she fled Venezuela’s dire economic straits with her husband and young son. They took the land route through the treacherous Darién Gap, traveling thousands of miles through Central America and then Mexico to reach the US border, she said.
Once they were bussed up to Denver, they found themselves with fellow Venezuelans at an encampment under a bridge north of downtown, near where I-70 crosses I-25, in an area full of squat industrial buildings alongside the freight rail tracks. The migrants cooked gifted food for each other in a makeshift kitchen, shared stories and became a small community.
A donated tent was the first American home for John David, Adriana’s 4-year-old son. The family stayed there for a month, but the weather soon made the preschooler ill.
“The cold weather has been tough,” Adriana told us earlier this month, on a day when a howling winter wind drowned out the noise from the interstates. “It’s horrible, my son suffers from asthma, and he’s been sick with a cough. I’ve been treating him with some medication that was given to me.”
Some of those living in the tent village have no shoes, and they layer socks to give their feet a little protection from the cold and the crust of frozen snow that covers the stony dirt below. Inside the tents, sheets of polystyrene foam are used as insulation, and clothes are piled up on church-donated mattresses to give extra support and warmth.
As an Arctic blast began to hit the city, Mayor Johnston and his staff were out warning the migrants of the freezing temperatures to come and urging them to go to new shelters or warming centers. Hotels leased by the city just last month to house migrants are already full.
“We’re having the coldest days of the year and we want to move all the people inside. We have beds, it’s warmer,” he said in Spanish made fluent from his years as a school principal in northern Colorado, working with many Latino children and parents.
‘All I want is a job’
Checking in at the shelter later that day, Johnston was soon swarmed by people grateful for the help being offered, but full of questions: How long can the city help them, but most of all, when can they work?He asked if they came from Venezuela, and then when they arrived in the US, having to explain if they came after July 31, 2023, there is no way for asylum-seekers to work legally unless the federal government extends TPS. And that is frustrating for both the mayor and migrants.
“You talk to people who say, ‘I walked 3,000 miles to get here, and all I want is a job. Can you help me find some place to work? I don’t need charity. I just want to be able to support myself. Can I work?’” Johnston said. “And at the same time, we got employers all over the city who call me every day and say, ‘Hey, I know you’ve got migrants who just arrived. I got open jobs. Can I please hire them?’”
But right now, the answer is no.
“The federal government could provide next to no support to cities if all these folks have work authorization, because they’d be supporting themselves,” Johnston said. But with some being told they may have to wait six years for their asylum claims to be heard, he said, much of the need to support them will fall on the cities where they are waiting.
Yorgelis Fabiola, who is from Venezuela, said she was pleased to see the mayor asking about their situation, but she still needed answers. “It really is worrying. I don’t have a job right now, I’m afraid that when my stay ends here, they’ll throw me out on the street with my son, because I have nowhere else to go.”
As she shared her concerns with Johnston, Fabiola began to cry. “I thank all of you and I apologize for having entered your country illegally.”
Denver has now updated its policies on housing migrant families, resuming requirements for families to leave city facilities, but raising initial stays for new arrivals to six weeks.
Johnston is looking at Denver having to foot an annual bill of $180 million for migrant services, which would lead to major cuts in other city budgets, he said. “We don’t want to take police officers off the street. We don’t want to take firefighters off the street. We don’t want to not do trash pickup or not have our parks and recreation centers open.” But hard decisions are coming, he said.
If migrants tell the city they have connections in other places, Johnston’s administration will try to help to get them there. Adriana and her son John David got bus vouchers to California, but Johnston said there was no attempt to move migrants on unless they asked.
Without work authorization, some migrants are trying to find off-the-books employment. Groups congregate outside the big hardware stores from 5:30 a.m., before sunrise, hoping to pick up day labor jobs for cash, in construction or shoveling snow or doing whatever needs to be done.
It’s hit or miss, with one man telling CNN he had found work for only 15 days in the last three months. And even working is no guarantee of being paid, with another man complaining to the mayor that he labored for 10 days with others to build a roof and was sent packing with no money.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Biden is left with few choices as immigration takes center stage in American politics
SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. (AP) — Almost immediately after he walked into the Oval Office on his first day as president, Joe Biden began rolling back his predecessor’s immigration policies, which he had assailed throughout the 2020 campaign as harsh and inhumane.
A lot has changed in three years.
Biden, now sounding increasingly like former President Donald Trump, is pressing Congress for asylum restrictions that would have been unthinkable when he took office. He’s doing it under pressure not just from Republicans but from Democrats, including elected officials in cities thousands of miles from the border who are feeling the effects of asylum seekers arriving in the United States in record numbers.
With the 2024 presidential campaign shaping up as a likely rematch between Biden and Trump, immigration has moved to the forefront as one of the president’s biggest potential liabilities. Biden, looking to neutralize it, has already embraced a sweeping bipartisan measure still being negotiated in the Senate that would expand his authority to put strict new limits on border crossings.
“If that bill were the law today, I’d shut down the border right now and fix it quickly,” Biden said last weekend.
The bill’s future is uncertain, and Trump has weighed in against it, but Biden’s Democratic allies have grown impatient for the president to act.
Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a liberal Democrat, recently called on the president to call up the National Guard, and when he declined, she did it herself at the state’s expense.
“Every Arizonan should know we are taking significant and meaningful steps to keep them safe, even when the federal government refuses to,” Hobbs said in her state of the state address in January.
The influx has strained social services in cities including New York, Chicago and Denver, which are struggling to shelter thousands of asylum seekers without housing or work authorization. Images of migrants with nowhere to go camping out in public have dominated local newscasts.
Nine Democratic governors from all across the country sent a letter last week to Biden and congressional leaders pleading for action from Washington “to solve what has become a humanitarian crisis.”
States and cities are spending billions to respond but are outmatched by the record pace of new arrivals, wrote the governors of Arizona, California, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and New Mexico.
They asked for money to help with their immediate needs and a commitment to work toward modernizing immigration laws.
“It is clear our national immigration system is outdated and unprepared to respond to this unprecedented global migration,” the governors wrote.
Trump, meanwhile, is eager to rekindle the passions that the border fueled during his successful 2016 campaign, when his vow to build a wall along the southern border with Mexico became perhaps his most familiar rallying cry.
“It has been a message that has resonated not just with Republicans or Democrats, but across the country, because now even those liberal cities, those blue cities, those blue mayors, they’re saying we can’t handle the crisis anymore and give us help,” said Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s first 2016 campaign manager. “It is a fundamental shift in thinking over the last eight years on the issue.”
Trump lamented over the weekend that his border message didn’t resonate when he ran for reelection in 2020. He said it was because he’d done such a good job controlling the border that he “took it out of play,” though at the time voters were largely focused on COVID-19 and the pandemic had dampened job prospects for migrants.
“Literally we couldn’t put it in a speech,” Trump said at a campaign rally Saturday in Las Vegas. “Nobody wanted to hear about the border. We had no border problem. But now we can talk about the border because it’s never, ever been worse than it is now.”
As president, Trump separated children from their families at the U.S.-Mexico border as an effort to deter people from crossing in a policy that was maligned as inhumane by world leaders, U.S. lawmakers and even Pope Francis. When he ran for office the first time he referred to Mexican immigrants as “rapists and criminals” and this campaign has gone farther, saying migrants are “ destroying the blood of our country.”
In the end, total deportations were higher under the first term of President Barack Obama, who enacted enforcement priorities similar to Biden’s, than under Trump. That was due in part to a lack of cooperation from many cities and states whose leaders opposed Trump’s immigration policies.
By the end of Trump’s administration, the U.S. had completed more than 450 miles (720 kilometers) of new wall construction along the 2,000-mile (3,145 kilometer) border. Much of the construction was in areas where there had already been some form of barrier.
An immigration deal in Congress that had been in the works for weeks is now in jeopardy largely because Trump is loath to give Biden a win on immigration, an issue he wants to hammer as his own as he seeks a return to the White House, and his supporters in Congress are following his lead.
White House spokesperson Angelo Fernandez Hernandez said House Republicans under Speaker Mike Johnson are blocking Biden’s efforts to improve border security.
“It’s long past time for Speaker Johnson and the House GOP to join President Biden and work across the aisle in the best interests of the majority of the American people, who back President Biden’s approach,” Fernandez Hernandez said in a statement.
Johnson has argued Biden already has enough authority to stop illegal border crossings, but without congressional backing, many actions he could take would likely be challenged in court. Trump and Biden alike used emergency authority from the COVID-19 pandemic, known as Title 42, to quickly turn back migrants at the border. With the public health emergency now over, Biden can’t use those powers.
Frustration among voters has escalated.
Wayne Bowens, a 72-year-old retired real estate agent in Scottsdale, Arizona, said he’s disgusted by both Biden and Trump’s recent border moves. Biden is only changing his tune because he’s worried about losing, he said, and Trump is hoping to block the Senate deal to help him win.
“Ukraine, Israel. People are dying. And yet other people are thinking, ‘How many votes can I get if I play this right?’” said Bowens, a Republican who dislikes both leading candidates but will likely vote for Trump unless a viable third-party candidate emerges. “It’s become a very disgusting world.”
Immigration remains a major worry for voters in the 2024 election. An AP-NORC poll earlier this month found that those voicing concerns about immigration climbed to 35% from 27% last year. Most Republicans, 55%, say the government needs to focus on immigration in 2024, while 22% of Democrats listed immigration as a priority. That’s up from 45% and 14%, respectively, in December 2022.
Arrests for illegal border crossings from Mexico reached an all-time high in December since monthly numbers have been released.
The Border Patrol tallied just under 250,000 arrests on the Mexican border in December, up 31% from 191,000 in November and up 13% from 222,000 in December 2022, the previous all-time high.
The situation on the border makes Biden vulnerable with two voting groups he’ll need to win — Latinos and college-educated white Republican women, said Mike Madrid, a California-based Republican strategist who has worked to defeat Trump and has a book on Latino voters set for release this summer.
Biden has no choice but to embrace tougher border security and restrict asylum, even though it will anger progressives in his base, Madrid said.
“It is his single biggest problem,” Madrid said. “And it is the single biggest opportunity, because I think if he can put the Republicans on defense he’s in a very commanding position to win reelection.”
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
The unprecedented situation at the US-Mexico border – visualized
They missed what is probably a large contributing factor- the fact that since Biden took power American media is just constantly swamped with talking heads shrieking about how the borders are wide open and people can just walk right in and immediately get handed an EBT card and a ballot (nevermind that none of that is actually true).
In Harlem’s ‘Little Senegal,' West African migrants find community and challenges
Harlem's "Little Senegal" has recently become an epicenter for a new wave of mostly young, male West African migrants, who are simultaneously finding community and challenges as well as coming to terms with the harsh realities of living in New York City.
The new arrivals, who are mostly in their late teens and 20s, are a conspicuous fixture on West 116th Street, where they often congregate. They speak in their native Wolof, which is commonplace in Senegal, and are typically seen toting insulated food-delivery backpacks on their e-bikes.
Some of them said they shelter in mosques and churches located nearby as well as in the Bronx and Westchester. They reassemble in the early morning, when a line forms outside the Senegalese Association of America's office, near St. Nicholas Avenue, where they go for help completing asylum applications.
“I always heard that 116th Street was ‘Little Senegal,’” said Ibrahim Mbengue, a 26-year-old Senegalese migrant, as he waited on a recent day. “That's why I came here.”
Although the city’s “migrant crisis” began nearly two years ago with an influx of Venezuelans and other Latin Americans who were bused north after crossing the southern border, the number of migrants from West African nations like Senegal, Guinea and Mauritania has tripled in the last year alone and garnered worldwide attention.
Although Harlem's West African community, which has deep roots in the neighborhood, has embraced the newcomers, there are signs of strain and ambivalence over the migrants according to community leaders, expats and the migrants themselves. And a city bureaucracy that critics say falls short of the newcomers' basic needs further amplifies the concerns.
Local nonprofits, including the Senegalese Association, have helped ease the migrants' transition, but some group leaders say they are being stretched to the limit.
“We want to help. We want to do all these services for free,” said the association’s President Mamadou Drame. “But hey, who's going to pay for the rent? Who's going to pay for the light to be on?”
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
In New York Win, Democrats Sense a Pivot on Immigration and Border Politics
(NYT Paywall)
A victory in a New York special election on Tuesday injected Democrats with fresh optimism that the party might have found some of the basic ingredients to neutralize immigration and the border as political issues, which party officials have privately seen as among their deepest areas of vulnerability in 2024.The success in the race for a House seat by former and now future Representative Tom Suozzi — a Democrat whom Republicans had pilloried as “Sanctuary Suozzi” — came in a corner of the country, Long Island, that had been increasingly hostile to Democrats in the last two years. And Mr. Suozzi won after he frontally and repeatedly addressed a topic that his party has sometimes tried to shy away from.
With border crossings surging to record highs in recent months and more than 170,000 migrants arriving in New York City, Republicans had hoped to use immigration to paint Mr. Suozzi as unacceptably beyond the mainstream. The leading G.O.P. super PAC spent roughly $3 million on two television ads that said Mr. Suozzi had “rolled out the red carpet for illegal immigrants.”
But in the final 10 days of the race, an analysis from AdImpact, the media-tracking firm, showed that Democrats were actually airing more ads than Republicans on immigration, with Mr. Suozzi’s campaign running clips of an appearance he once made on Fox News in which he was introduced as “one of the Democrats” backing I.C.E., the immigration enforcement agency.
Mr. Suozzi’s victory came only days after congressional Republicans had torpedoed bipartisan legislation on Capitol Hill that would have cracked down on unlawful migration across the border with Mexico. Donald J. Trump, the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, had lobbied aggressively against the bill, insisting that its passage would help Democrats as he hoped to preserve the border crisis as a cudgel to hit President Biden with this fall.
That bipartisan deal’s failure did not feature prominently in advertising in this House race. But Mr. Suozzi did speak about it as he took some unusually hard-line stances for a Democrat, including calls to temporarily shut down the border and deport migrants who assault the police.
There is going to be a lot of yelling about this, but I'm not going to be surprised in the slightest if the national message from Dems gets much, much tougher on the border.
Again, anti-immigrant sentiment/rhetoric is a powerful political tool that, at least in my lifetime (elder Millennial) I haven't seen anyone meaningfully defeat in anything other than the short term.
Like, the first thing I thought of reading this article was Angela Merkel and the CDU in Germany. They were all "Immigrants Welcome" at first. Most of Germany was!
At first.
Aaaaand then it turned. Turned so hard that the AfD became a thing, and in order to hold on to power, the CDU had to start taking a tougher stance on immigration.
Like, to be clear, I'm not a fan of this, but I've said this before, I don't think there's a country on earth that, when dealing with sudden mass migration by foreigners, hasn't seen its citizenry get real anti-Immigrant real fast, and some political parties seize on that to take power.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Very good episode of the NYT's "The Daily" today.
I cannot be the only person who was very surprised to find out that, after Venezuelans, one of the largest groups of migrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border is Chinese nationals. The NYT spoke to one of those people for their episode today and to begin to get an idea of why thousands of Chinese people are seeking opportunities elsewhere.
How China Broke One Man's Dreams
A crisis of confidence is brewing inside China, where the government is turning believers in the Chinese dream into skeptics willing to flee the country.
Li Yuan, who writes about technology, business and politics across Asia for The Times, explains why that crisis is now showing up at the United States’ southern border.
Background reading:
Why more Chinese are risking danger in southern border crossings to the United States.
More than 24,000 Chinese citizens have been apprehended making the crossing from Mexico in the past year. That is more than in the preceding 10 years combined.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
The White House is weighing executive actions on the border — with immigration powers used by Trump
WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House is considering using provisions of federal immigration law repeatedly tapped by former President Donald Trump to unilaterally enact a sweeping crackdown at the southern border, according to three people familiar with the deliberations.
The administration, stymied by Republican lawmakers who rejected a negotiated border bill earlier this month, has been exploring options that President Joe Biden could deploy on his own without congressional approval, multiple officials and others familiar with the talks said. But the plans are nowhere near finalized and it’s unclear how the administration would draft any such executive actions in a way that would survive the inevitable legal challenges. The officials and those familiar with the talks spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to comment on private ongoing White House discussions.
The exploration of such avenues by Biden’s team underscores the pressure the president faces this election year on immigration and the border, which have been among his biggest political liabilities since he took office. For now, the White House has been hammering congressional Republicans for refusing to act on border legislation that the GOP demanded, but the administration is also aware of the political perils that high numbers of migrants could pose for the president and is scrambling to figure out how Biden could ease the problem on his own.
White House spokesperson Angelo Fernández Hernández stressed that “no executive action, no matter how aggressive, can deliver the significant policy reforms and additional resources Congress can provide and that Republicans rejected.”
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Of course, the migrants have all said that living in that house is better than living in any of the city's shelters.
I may have missed something, but I genuinely have no idea what the Biden admin's strategy on this has been. Like, at all, beyond just ignoring it.
Like, I get it. A LOT is going on right now. But several American cities have essentially been left to fend for themselves, and there doesn't appear to have been even any rudimentary steps taken by the federal government to assist the situation (like working papers!).
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
‘There is no crisis’: Biden will find calm not chaos at Texas border visit
Joe Biden will travel to the US-Mexico border on Thursday amid rising concerns expressed by voters nationwide over immigration, as pressure builds on the US president to respond to alarmist rightwing claims of “invasion”, “crisis” and waves of “migrant crime”.
But when Biden arrives in Brownsville, Texas, he is likely to encounter scenes like those prevailing earlier this week in the city of almost 200,000 that lies at the eastern end of the border. Shoppers walked the streets and preparations were under way for annual binational celebrations, Charro Days and Sombrero fest, which highlight the city’s close relationship with its Mexican sister city, Matamoros.
Border patrol processing facilities in downtown Brownsville, where migrants can usually be found before or after making a formal request for asylum, and the bus station, where migrants are often heading out of town, were empty after a drop in the number of people crossing the border in the last two months.
Migration into the US is often cyclical and affected by numerous factors. Brownsville has gone through periods in a given year when nearly 1,000 people are crossing in a day, straining local resources, while others wait on the Mexican side of the border, often for months, trying to get an appointment with the US authorities to ask for asylum. But Biden can expect to find things calm and orderly.
Local advocate Priscilla Orta, director of Project Corazon at Lawyers for Good Government, said simply: “There is no crisis.”
She added: “I think that part of the border is by far the most secure, the safest, the most well-regulated. The most empathetic [federal law enforcement] are the border unit here in Brownsville,” she said.
Some 300 miles upstream along the Rio Grande, which marks the border in Texas, Donald Trump will make a dueling appearance on Thursday, descending upon what is effectively a militarized zone created by the hard-right Texas governor, Greg Abbott.
Like, I get it, but I think that going with the "actually, it's fine" option won't work. Certainly not now.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
Supreme Court says Texas can arrest and jail migrants
The Supreme Court has allowed Texas to enforce one of the toughest immigration laws enacted by any US state in recent memory.
The measure allows police to arrest and prosecute those suspected of illegally crossing the US-Mexican border.
The Biden administration has challenged the law, calling it unconstitutional.
Crossing the US border illegally is already a federal crime, but violations are usually handled as civil cases by the immigration court system.
One reason the Texas law, SB4, is so controversial is because courts have previously ruled that only the federal government can enforce the country's immigration laws, not individual US states.
SB4 gives local and state police officers the ability to stop and arrest anyone suspected of having crossed the border illegally, except in schools, healthcare facilities and places of worship.
Punishments would range from misdemeanours to felonies and potential imprisonment, or fines of up to $2,000 (£1,570).
Penalties for those who illegally re-enter Texas after having been deported could go up to 20 years in prison, depending on a person's immigration and criminal history.
Mexico refuses to accept any migrants deported by Texas under new state law
Mexico has refused to accept any migrants deported by Texas under one of the toughest immigration laws enacted by any US state in modern times.
"Mexico will not accept, under any circumstances, repatriations by the State of Texas," the government said.
The statement was issued as the US Supreme Court allowed the measure, SB4, to take effect pending an appeal.
The law allows police in Texas to arrest those suspected of illegally crossing the US-Mexican border.
The Biden administration has challenged the law, calling it unconstitutional.
Courts have previously ruled that only the federal government can enforce the country's immigration laws, not individual US states.
I love America more than any other country in the world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.
In New York Win, Democrats Sense a Pivot on Immigration and Border Politics
(NYT Paywall)
A victory in a New York special election on Tuesday injected Democrats with fresh optimism that the party might have found some of the basic ingredients to neutralize immigration and the border as political issues, which party officials have privately seen as among their deepest areas of vulnerability in 2024.The success in the race for a House seat by former and now future Representative Tom Suozzi — a Democrat whom Republicans had pilloried as “Sanctuary Suozzi” — came in a corner of the country, Long Island, that had been increasingly hostile to Democrats in the last two years. And Mr. Suozzi won after he frontally and repeatedly addressed a topic that his party has sometimes tried to shy away from.
With border crossings surging to record highs in recent months and more than 170,000 migrants arriving in New York City, Republicans had hoped to use immigration to paint Mr. Suozzi as unacceptably beyond the mainstream. The leading G.O.P. super PAC spent roughly $3 million on two television ads that said Mr. Suozzi had “rolled out the red carpet for illegal immigrants.”
But in the final 10 days of the race, an analysis from AdImpact, the media-tracking firm, showed that Democrats were actually airing more ads than Republicans on immigration, with Mr. Suozzi’s campaign running clips of an appearance he once made on Fox News in which he was introduced as “one of the Democrats” backing I.C.E., the immigration enforcement agency.
Mr. Suozzi’s victory came only days after congressional Republicans had torpedoed bipartisan legislation on Capitol Hill that would have cracked down on unlawful migration across the border with Mexico. Donald J. Trump, the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, had lobbied aggressively against the bill, insisting that its passage would help Democrats as he hoped to preserve the border crisis as a cudgel to hit President Biden with this fall.
That bipartisan deal’s failure did not feature prominently in advertising in this House race. But Mr. Suozzi did speak about it as he took some unusually hard-line stances for a Democrat, including calls to temporarily shut down the border and deport migrants who assault the police.
There is going to be a lot of yelling about this, but I'm not going to be surprised in the slightest if the national message from Dems gets much, much tougher on the border.
Again, anti-immigrant sentiment/rhetoric is a powerful political tool that, at least in my lifetime (elder Millennial) I haven't seen anyone meaningfully defeat in anything other than the short term.
Like, the first thing I thought of reading this article was Angela Merkel and the CDU in Germany. They were all "Immigrants Welcome" at first. Most of Germany was!
At first.
Aaaaand then it turned. Turned so hard that the AfD became a thing, and in order to hold on to power, the CDU had to start taking a tougher stance on immigration.Like, to be clear, I'm not a fan of this, but I've said this before, I don't think there's a country on earth that, when dealing with sudden mass migration by foreigners, hasn't seen its citizenry get real anti-Immigrant real fast, and some political parties seize on that to take power.
It doesen't help that those who address the elephant in the room Yes, illegal AND legal immigration has at least some effect on low skilled low wage jobs in general, That most of the cities being overwhelmed by illegal immigration depend on the same sort of low wage work that the migrants are willing to do faster, cheaper and way less safely without complaint... (See meat packing plants.)
Both parties are run by money so neither party has any incentive to fix it.
Pages