Post a quote, that could have just been text but instead for some stupid reason is an image, entertain me!

farley3k wrote:

Good laugh from this one.

https://imgur.com/gallery/a6jevi3

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/F5SlWWS.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/fwgKMDv.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/zUJygTN.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/FfEeb39.jpg)

If they need to make room, they don't gotta burn the books, they just remove 'em.

farley3k wrote:

Good laugh from this one.

https://imgur.com/gallery/a6jevi3

Is their name the London Review Bookshop Bookshop?

bnpederson wrote:
farley3k wrote:

Good laugh from this one.

https://imgur.com/gallery/a6jevi3

Is their name the London Review Bookshop Bookshop?

That's my guess.

I'm assuming "Bookshop" is a specific area in London, and the tweets are coming from an establishment that sells books within that area. Otherwise none of it makes sense.

LRB is the London Review of Books magazine. LRB bookshop is the bookshop opened by the magazine.

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/hjwVKw7.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/BNhN5EG.jpg)

This is getting heavy...

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/gzpn74jp71h41.jpg)

(May not work in all regions)

Not For Sale

fangblackbone wrote:

Not For Sale :(

Upgrade kits available though.

I’m so happy I decided to look.

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/7dSTJ0V.jpg)

David Baddiel(@Baddiel) wrote:

Something I wrote in The Sunday Times a month ago.
IMAGE(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EQ1m4bEWkAIENLX?format=png&name=900x900)

As I've said for years, Web 2.0 was a mistake.

maverickz wrote:

As I've said for years, Web 2.0 was a mistake.

Damn... this is why we now have a polarizing image thread next to the entertaining image thread...

IMAGE(https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/86796564_3274391229243382_8233928824463556608_n.jpg?_nc_cat=107&_nc_ohc=PVNLRlSy5aAAX_ID2s5&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-1.xx&oh=abeb60a5001e809b45486c88ad3e47ac&oe=5EBB31FE)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/ryea2yN.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/tKyDptc.jpg)

Ouch... better rush BK into the burn unit. That one sizzles.

points off for "on" instead of "in"

if you're going to be the vanguard in our dystopian corporate future Wendy's, at least never miss an opportunity to get closer to Idiocracy's "f*ck You! I'm Eating!"

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/MAEEUsU.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/Vuuq5zp.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/Qujr0nG.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/JP04yj6.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/iIukOqg.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/bkLt028.jpg)

I will not stand for your nacho socialism

The problem is tessellating the chips such that every chip has toppings and isn't hidden under other chips. It's really hard to do on any sized plate.

Hence, the true solution is plate-sized chips. Added bonus, saves on washing up.

Spoiler:

Though not on laundry.

Unless....naked nachos? Or should that be nacho singular?

I usually make nachos on a sheet pan, precisely so that the toppings can be evenly distributed.

Mexican pizza

maverickz wrote:

Mexican pizza

Yuuup! We make "burritza" at home. You put everything you'd normally put in a burrito onto a pizza base, using the refried beans in place of pizza sauce.

Es muy delicioso!

Jonman wrote:
maverickz wrote:

Mexican pizza

Yuuup! We make "burritza" at home. You put everything you'd normally put in a burrito onto a pizza base, using the refried beans in place of pizza sauce.

Es muy delicioso!

I can't disagree with any of that!

Why can't silicon valley create a 3d nacho printer. Solves all our problems. or a nacho conveyor belt that would perfectly coat all chips in nacho mix and cheese with a brief pass through a broiler. Uh see you later guys I think I need to go make the NachoBelt Bar. Bring your pants & Belt cuz this is NachoBelt.

IMAGE(https://i.imgur.com/OwYauUR.jpg)

IMAGE(https://i.redd.it/ocqjkzwbb4j41.jpg)

Nachos should be layered like lasagna.
Mmmmm, forbidden lasagna!