[Discussion] Men talking to men about Feminism

This thread is for people who believe that when it comes to feminism it's important for men to listen to women and to talk to men.

In this thread we assume Feminism is something you wholeheartedly support or want to support. Questions about the validity of Feminism are for somewhere else.

RnRClown wrote:
LarryC wrote:

The way I see it is, if she isn't impatiently tearing off my clothes, nothing is going to happen. I don't take off my own clothes. I've never needed to.

I agree. I was forever on the back foot waiting to be led. I've always had this notion that you do whatever the girl wants you to do, and when.

Then society seemed to suggest I was supposed to aggressively pursue women, and take the lead, sexually, to convey my manliness. Thank goodness I never had to consider this. Look at what it can cause. I wonder how many men think it is normal, or desirable.

If this Conan interview with Jason Momoa is to be believed, many women do like aggressive men

To be fair it does appear to be in the context of a long-term monogamous relationship. Definitely different than a one-night stand where trust has yet to be established.

How many men saw that and thought, "I'm officially licensed to do this on a first date"?

I don't know that Momoa is any sort of paragon we should aspire towards :/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...

JeffreyLSmith wrote:

If this Conan interview with Jason Momoa is to be believed, many women do like aggressive men

To be fair it does appear to be in the context of a long-term monogamous relationship. Definitely different than a one-night stand where trust has yet to be established.

How many men saw that and thought, "I'm officially licensed to do this on a first date"?

He actually qualifies that his own wife doesn't seem to like that very much.

My own wife sometimes likes that aggressive play, but that's something that's negotiated over a long time and often very explicitly. It's kind of like light S&M at that point. You have to say what you want, and you need to establish how to say you're done with it.

So sometimes I'll be touching her all over and chasing her around the house and she's all like "No, no!" but she's laughing and giggling the whole time and she waits for me to catch up when I have to pause because I'm caught on a railing or something. This isn't something you can do as a pick up game with a stranger.

Tanglebones wrote:

I don't know that Momoa is any sort of paragon we should aspire towards :/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...

Definitely not. But that interview was the first thing that came to mind when I read RnRClown's post.

Note that your link referenced things he said in 2011. The interview I linked was from 2014. But not until #MeToo last year did any of this get enough negative attention to prompt Momoa to respond with contrition.

I didn't watch the clip, but based on the title of the clip I'd say an argument might be made for book Khal Drogo, who never did anything until he got a "yes" and was actually seductive and ended up winning Dani over (the non-consent of the actual marriage notwithstanding), but no way in hell for show Khal Drogo. That portrayal was one of my biggest problems with the translation from book to show. I still get angry about it.

Since my view of the Aziz story is posted here, I do want to say that if more of these stories come up, I will most likely lose any sympathy I have for him and I reserve my right to change my opinion on whether or not he is a monster and a predator. I just think this situation is much less clear than the other assault, abuse, and rape stories that we're hearing. I think the conversation here so far is very good to have among men, and I'll mostly be reading silently.

RnRClown wrote:
LarryC wrote:

The way I see it is, if she isn't impatiently tearing off my clothes, nothing is going to happen. I don't take off my own clothes. I've never needed to.

I agree. I was forever on the back foot waiting to be led. I've always had this notion that you do whatever the girl wants you to do, and when.

Then society seemed to suggest I was supposed to aggressively pursue women, and take the lead, sexually, to convey my manliness. Thank goodness I never had to consider this. Look at what it can cause. I wonder how many men think it is normal, or desirable.

I'll clarify that I've never needed to take off my own clothes even when I was leading and initiating. This isn't about being on the back foot or following. It's about that conversation. I might unhook her bra. Maybe it's called for. Maybe it isn't; I don't know. I think it's okay, so I'll do it. If she doesn't reciprocate, then that conversation is over and we're largely keeping our clothes on.

But in general, whenever I unhook a bra or take off someone's top, my clothes disappear in quick fashion without my having to do much about it. If my woman companion doesn't want to see my penis, all she has to do is decline to take off my pants. I will never take it off, myself. I will not press her to do it. It's her call.

Well, this thread is off to an interesting start.

And here I thought reading about Aziz Ansari's moves would be the weirdest part of my day.

Might get weirder if I can manage to figure out how to form some thoughts here.

For now, just this:

SillyRabbit wrote:

That portrayal was one of my biggest problems with the translation from book to show. I still get angry about it.

Absolutely agreed -- that was one of several major factors in my choice to stop watching the show after the first season.

I've often wondered if men internalize and process being a victim of sexual harassment, and sexual assault, in a different way to women. Or if it's the same. Shame at being targeted. Shame at not being able to overcome it. Shame at allowing it to shape them.

It's often that men are simply seen as perpetrators. And that we're too "tough" to be a victim of anything. Then if it's at the hands of another man and not being homosexual.

The other notion is that men don't have any skin in it even if not a victim themselves. This assumes no emotional connection to anyone other than themselves. Not wanting to protect loved ones.

Questions I've never put anywhere.

IMAGE(https://i.pinimg.com/736x/f3/58/c0/f358c01bc56a238e86f60092a21bb852--art-rules-game-of-life.jpg)

I've been thinking about the Aziz Ansari story for some time now for two reasons. The first is the story is one sided, it is about missed nonverbal cues. We don't get his story (and truthfully we don't need to nor does he owe it to us) about the missed cues he saw. I'm sure a lot of men have been in that situation where cues (especially a first date and possible night together) are missed - I admit that I have been there. I made a strict policy of setting the ground rules early in a relationship - say "no," but that is often an awkward conversation when thing seem to be flowing well - and I have dated women who were turned off by that conversation.

The second thing that got me was this is a lot of men's fears about this situation. They have a night together, or get close, and for whatever reason the next day the story changes to "rape," "assault," or "I didn't want to do that." That made me angry because I agree with Flanagan's article that this seemed like a hit piece because of this. There were plenty of opportunities for 'Grace" to say her mind but it seems like she rarely did if it being what type of wine to drink or even deciding to go back to his apartment rather than go somewhere else. Is there outside (e.g. societal) pressure to go along with it? Undoubtedly. Is that Aziz Ansari's fault for that pressure? No.

Some of the conversation has focused on that societal pressure and this is a good conversation that we all need to have. Where the problem comes in is attempting to use Ansari as the whipping boy to teach that lesson. He never needed to be named for that to come across.

I don't think that makes me less of a feminist, but am comfortable and open minded enough to take criticism for this (maybe I'm wrong).

RnRClown wrote:

I've often wondered if men internalize and process being a victim of sexual harassment, and sexual assault, in a different way to women. Or if it's the same.

Given the radically different cultural milieu in which men and women (s)exist, I can't see any answer to this question but "of course men internalize and process it differently", but I also recognize that that's talking in the aggregate, and that I'm also sure that you can find men and women who'll process it identically to one another.

Flintheart Glomgold wrote:

I've been thinking about the Aziz Ansari story for some time now for two reasons. The first is the story is one sided, it is about missed nonverbal cues. We don't get his story (and truthfully we don't need to nor does he owe it to us) about the missed cues he saw. I'm sure a lot of men have been in that situation where cues (especially a first date and possible night together) are missed - I admit that I have been there. I made a strict policy of setting the ground rules early in a relationship - say "no," but that is often an awkward conversation when thing seem to be flowing well - and I have dated women who were turned off by that conversation.

The second thing that got me was this is a lot of men's fears about this situation. They have a night together, or get close, and for whatever reason the next day the story changes to "rape," "assault," or "I didn't want to do that." That made me angry because I agree with Flanagan's article that this seemed like a hit piece because of this. There were plenty of opportunities for 'Grace" to say her mind but it seems like she rarely did if it being what type of wine to drink or even deciding to go back to his apartment rather than go somewhere else. Is there outside (e.g. societal) pressure to go along with it? Undoubtedly. Is that Aziz Ansari's fault for that pressure? No.

Some of the conversation has focused on that societal pressure and this is a good conversation that we all need to have. Where the problem comes in is attempting to use Ansari as the whipping boy to teach that lesson. He never needed to be named for that to come across.

I don't think that makes me less of a feminist, but am comfortable and open minded enough to take criticism for this (maybe I'm wrong).

To me, I struggle to draw comparisons between "normal" people and our encounters and those of celebrity and there encounters because their status changes the power dynamic.

I'm cautious to make a judgement call on the whole situation because I think it's probably best to wait and see if there's more who come forward about him, as Tanglebones suggested. Bill Cosby and his accusers should be a good lesson here and Aziz doesn't have anywhere near the amount of good will behind him as Cosby did.

Edit: Oh, and I'm curious about this-

The second thing that got me was this is a lot of men's fears about this situation. They have a night together, or get close, and for whatever reason the next day the story changes to "rape," "assault," or "I didn't want to do that."

I have never worried about this. Not once. Not ever. Is this something you've actually encountered yourself?

I mean, of course I'd be afraid of someone claiming I'd assaulted them cause that would be super serious, but there's simply no time in my life where I've woken up the next day and worried that would happen. I dunno, maybe I'm weird like that and out of touch with other men.

I am the same. That's the reason I never take off anything and I never even suggest that they do so verbally. If they take off my clothes of their own free will, then that's a big sign that they're into it, too. But the conversation thing isn't over by then. By no means.

Basically, this is how I personalize saying that it has to be continuing consent, and you have to set boundaries for yourself that the other party must willing and unequivocally cross for anything to happen. This is your failsafe, but it is also their failsafe as well. Not everyone will come to the same solution I have, but it's important to frame this as a mutual activity with reciprocation in very concrete terms.

This will get weirder, for people who don't like talking about sex, don't click the spoiler.

Spoiler:

I don't penetrate women with anything if they're not wet. I don't use my saliva. I don't use lubricants. If she's not wet, I'm betting that she's not into it until she says otherwise. So that entire area is completely no-go until then. And even when I feel that she's wet, I STILL initiate verbal confirmation. "Oooh, you like me that much, huh? Getting ready to ride?" A verbal confirmation can still be raunchy and fun while being completely a functional question. It doesn't have to involve clipboards and checklists. If she doesn't literally ask for it or at least answer in affirmative, the area is still a no-go.

garion333 wrote:
The second thing that got me was this is a lot of men's fears about this situation. They have a night together, or get close, and for whatever reason the next day the story changes to "rape," "assault," or "I didn't want to do that."

I have never worried about this. Not once. Not ever. Is this something you've actually encountered yourself?

I mean, of course I'd be afraid of someone claiming I'd assaulted them cause that would be super serious, but there's simply no time in my life where I've woken up the next day and worried that would happen. I dunno, maybe I'm weird like that and out of touch with other men.

While I've never knowingly encountered this, with hindsight, I do know that as a teenager/young adult, I couldn't have found my own moral compass with both hands, a flashlight and a map. I'm pretty certain that at times, I was a completely self-centered asshole, and I'm not 100% certain that any of those times didn't co-incide with some kind of sexual interaction (albeit that there weren't a whole lot of those anyway).

There is nothing in Grace's account which sounds like any kind of yes to me and plenty that sounds like a hard no. Her story is specific in details and believable. Ansari apologised and pulled the "heat of the moment" defence with her and the "it was consensual" defence with everyone else.

Sorry no. No effing way are there grey areas there. This is flat out him not accepting a "no" and pressing on regardless. And anyone who worries about whether the "story will change the next day" in my opinion needs to seriously re-evaluate their definition of enthusiastic consent.

garion333 wrote:
The second thing that got me was this is a lot of men's fears about this situation. They have a night together, or get close, and for whatever reason the next day the story changes to "rape," "assault," or "I didn't want to do that."

I have never worried about this. Not once. Not ever. Is this something you've actually encountered yourself?

Your question kinda puts me on the defensive (and I understand why after reading it again) so let me rephrase a bit: After many accusations many men (exclude me from this group) and usually the accused will form a question, or a defense that it was "bad sex." Some people will think this even if not the accused. This is a problem. This story feeds that problem - mostly because I believe it attempts to place all blame towards him which makes it look more of a hit piece than anything else.

<.<
>.>
Someone brought up the topic of Emotional Workload earlier. This article does a pretty good job of explaining it from a woman's perspective.

<.<
>.>

Maq wrote:

There is nothing in Grace's account which sounds like any kind of yes to me and plenty that sounds like a hard no. Her story is specific in details and believable. Ansari apologised and pulled the "heat of the moment" defence with her and the "it was consensual" defence with everyone else.

Sorry no. No effing way are there grey areas there. This is flat out him not accepting a "no" and pressing on regardless. And anyone who worries about whether the "story will change the next day" in my opinion needs to seriously re-evaluate their definition of enthusiastic consent.

I think the entire story is full of grey areas. It is obvious to the reader that she didn't want to and was uncomfortable I'm not sure it was obvious to him. A lot of the piece screams "unreliable narrator" which has less to do with "Grace" than it does the author.

My dad (in his late 60's now) broached this subject with me a few months ago when the Weinstein stuff was in the news everywhere. He was genuinely unsure of how to navigate the dynamic between men and women these days. Mind you, he's been married a very long time and well past looking for female companionship, so it was more in the context of his younger self and the cultural aspects.

He'd say things like "If I was in a bar and I was interested in someone, maybe I'd touch her knee to let her know I was interested. Now it seems like that would be considered harassment."

There was also some of the sort of vague, generalized bullet point stuff like "If they dress like that, why I can't I look? Why do they walk around late at night alone? Why go home with a dude if you don't want to have sex? Why not just say no?" It wouldn't occur to him to force himself on someone anyway so he figures 'no' is good enough for anyone.

Like a lot of men of his generation he's big on personal responsibility and sometimes that gets in the way of empathy or compassionate views. He has a hard time groking things like societal pressure, systemic oppression and rape culture. He grouses that framing the world in those ways makes things seem hopeless and untenable.

It's hard to contextualize an old conversation so I'll ask that you read the above as a general example, not an invitation to psychoanalyze my dad based on this little context.

After talking through that stuff for a while I gave him a hypothetical example based on an experience I had that finally seemed to click a little bit for him.

When I was 19 years old I was living alone in a neighbourhood that, unbeknownst to me, was a hot spot for gay men to cruise for sex. This was long before Grindr and the like. One night I was out for a walk alone and went down to the riverbank to sit on the grass for a bit. It was dark, about 100 feet from the road and out of sight from general traffic. A dude sat behind me and to the left about six feet away. It made my neck hair stand on end.

"Nice night," he said. "How you doing?"

"I'm good, you?"

"Good. Are you gay?"

"No, sorry."

"Have you considered giving it a shot?"

"Naw, I'm good. Thanks though."

He went on his way and that was that, but it still shook me. I could see that the guy was bigger and older than me, it was the first time I'd ever been so directly propositioned like that in a situation where I had zero interest and felt like I didn't have much control. I practically ran home after. Even back then I didn't connect my fleeting, singular experience with what it must be like for women and minorities most of the time. I was dense and slow to learn, still am.

I told my dad the story and asked him to imagine that the man sat beside me instead of a polite distance away. Imagine he put his hand on my knee while he was asking those questions. What if he had booze on his breath? What if he overpowered and raped me despite my saying I was straight and no interest? Would you have said it was my fault for walking alone at night? For sitting by the river? For not fighting back hard enough? How far down the chain would we get before we considered the actual rapist?

That really made him come up short. It could easily have happened, I wasn't a strong or particularly tough dude when I was young, naive and new to the city. I asked my dad to consider that it was like that for women most of the time and it was something they constantly had to be vigilant about. Men are generally bigger, generally in positions of power and generally getting away with this stuff constantly.

Working through this with our male friends and family is really hard but also really important. It's rarely going to be neat, tidy or executed in a way that is even congruent with our own feminist ideals, let alone the exemplars among us like Hypatian and Eleima. I felt like I had to be pretty blunt and vulnerable with my dad to really feel like he was hearing me and not clamming up and feeling defensive. I also had to swallow some frustration that was one part the basic, 101 misunderstandings he had and the other part being he was reflecting views I've held in the past and it was really uncomfortable to see them play out on my father's face.

Alright. Even more weirdness. I don't really care about Ansari. He'll be held accountable or he may not. But this thread is about us and what we do and what we can advise for other men to do to make things better.

So to establish a baseline, here's the article.

Ansari date thing

So what would I have done? Well, lots. But let's cut to the parts where I would just nope out.

“He said something along the lines of, ‘How about you hop up and take a seat?’” Within moments, he was kissing her. “In a second, his hand was on my breast.” Then he was undressing her, then he undressed himself. She remembers feeling uncomfortable at how quickly things escalated.

Nope. Undressing is SEXY. I like that stuff, and it's one of my failsafes. I'll undress her real slow, with plenty of room for give and take. If she's not taking my stuff off, we're making out on the countertop and that's it. Which is still a pretty darn fine way to spend an evening.

When Ansari told her he was going to grab a condom within minutes of their first kiss, Grace voiced her hesitation explicitly. “I said something like, ‘Whoa, let’s relax for a sec, let’s chill.’” She says he then resumed kissing her, briefly performed oral sex on her, and asked her to do the same thing to him. She did, but not for long. “It was really quick. Everything was pretty much touched and done within ten minutes of hooking up, except for actual sex.”

Hard nope out. You're both naked and she's telling you to chill? Big red flag. Absolutely verbal. Absolutely explicit. That's not a cue. That's a hard no. Relocate to couch and start over. Naked back massage for her, maybe. Then straight to oral sex? Huwaaaaat?!?!? Oral sex is very involved, and it's hardly the only sensual target on a woman's body with your tongue. There are safer places to start and it's sexier to drift down sequentially to give her plenty of time to respond.

She says Ansari began making a move on her that he repeated during their encounter. “The move he kept doing was taking his two fingers in a V-shape and putting them in my mouth, in my throat to wet his fingers, because the moment he’d stick his fingers in my throat he’d go straight for my vagina and try to finger me.” Grace called the move “the claw.”

Even harder nope out. If you need to wet your fingers, then you're not doing it for her, and going straight in doesn't work for hardly anyone, especially without lubrication. Maybe watch a few masturbation videos? Frontal pubic massage is how many, many women start self-pleasuring and it's not particularly painful if you're bad at it. That's a far, far, safer start. It's usually really easy to tell if you start doing something pretty good.

And all the other stuff after this? That's where it just jumps into egregious. 30 minutes of her pulling away cold can't possibly be missed by anyone seeking enthusiasm in their partner.

That'd be like playing Overwatch and your teammate just sits in the spawn area getting killed over and over. At some point, you gotta ask, "Dude, do you even want to play or what?"

There are just so many things here going wrong. A lot of very concrete things and breakpoints. There's nothing vague here. But whether Ansari knew what he was doing or not or if the account was even true, I hope more men think about these things in concrete ways and establish personal policies that prioritize getting the most out of their encounters. It's not just about getting away with a nice lay. It's the difference between a ten minute whatever and 2 hours of fun play.

Most importantly, it is essential to understand our relative positions of power and to equalize the situation so that everyone feels safe. When women say they want to feel safe, they largely want to feel safe from us. Yes, some women want us to be aggressive but still want to feel safe - which is why I pointed out that that's very complex negotiation. You're not protecting her from the world. You're largely responsible for protecting her from yourself. If she thinks she's safe with you, that's already a huge difference.

Flintheart Glomgold wrote:
Maq wrote:

There is nothing in Grace's account which sounds like any kind of yes to me and plenty that sounds like a hard no. Her story is specific in details and believable. Ansari apologised and pulled the "heat of the moment" defence with her and the "it was consensual" defence with everyone else.

Sorry no. No effing way are there grey areas there. This is flat out him not accepting a "no" and pressing on regardless. And anyone who worries about whether the "story will change the next day" in my opinion needs to seriously re-evaluate their definition of enthusiastic consent.

I think the entire story is full of grey areas. It is obvious to the reader that she didn't want to and was uncomfortable I'm not sure it was obvious to him. A lot of the piece screams "unreliable narrator" which has less to do with "Grace" than it does the author.

That, there, is the whole point. That's not a defence. At all.

If you're not getting an unequivocal yes, it's a no. End of story.

Flintheart Glomgold wrote:

I think the entire story is full of grey areas. It is obvious to the reader that she didn't want to and was uncomfortable I'm not sure it was obvious to him.

Even if these are grey areas, that's still a problem, and here's why: for sake of argument, let's say pushing into 'grey areas' a couple of times is an understandable mistake. If you keep pushing into 'grey areas' over and over, though, that's not a mistake. That's willful ignorance at best, and a slimy, intentional tactic at worst.

This comes across less as a seduction and more like a detective trying to grill the perp into admitting consent/guilt.

I'd posit that the existence of grey areas alone constitutes bad faith. You don't put vague wording in a contract unless you're planning to exploit it. You hammer out that beforehand and establish clear boundaries.

As I mentioned in the other thread, "not technically illegal" should not be within 100 miles of your definition of consent. There are no grey areas. A grey area is a no.

My family was and is predominantly female. The men were outnumbered and outdone, by which I mean the women were and are the success stories, the cornerstones of each family cluster.

In two of the three jobs I've held I answered to and worked alongside women, successfully, far more than men.

My job interviews, successful or otherwise, save for one, have been held by women.

When undertaking a learning course it was two women who helped me the most and made the greatest impact.

In one of my places of employment I watched as application forms were sorted based on gender in favour of women. (I found it agreeable.)

My father had little intentional impact on my life, amounted to very little in his time, and left little positive memories when he departed. (I still miss him, though.) My mother on the other hand is Wonder Woman. The greatest. The strongest most caring person I know. My siblings consist of two ace sisters.

I'm part conditioned to view women as leaders, those to aspire to, and men as also-rans. The other part is that we're of the same species, so treat everyone the same. I can't shake that women are simply better, though, made of more.

I've had one sexual partner, my wife, who until recent years I held an unrivalled bond with. (We're working on it.)

I've been told I'm an exception and not a rule. I see it now. I didn't always. It sort of seems to invalidate my opinion, though, as I'm not a woman, nor am I a typical example of a man.

Just thinking about the input about Filipino families earlier up thread. (I'm not Filipino. I am Northern Irish.)

My father wasn't less successful, though. He was VP for many credit card companies and had a great banking career. He held the steady job while my mother banked money for business ventures. Not all of those were successful, which is why you need someone with a steady job. My brother-in-law manages hardware and software development for various Canon products. My sister started the ice cream outfit. This is a fairly classic financial pairing.

It is not that unusual for a Filipino woman to earn more than her husband in a job. When that happens, the husband quits his job and handles the household as well as the business ventures. Obviously, it's extremely difficult to balance having a 9 to 5 as well as a fledging business, so nearly no one takes on both simultaneously. Or they can hold two jobs, though this is very hard on the kids.

LarryC wrote:
When Ansari told her he was going to grab a condom within minutes of their first kiss, Grace voiced her hesitation explicitly. “I said something like, ‘Whoa, let’s relax for a sec, let’s chill.’” She says he then resumed kissing her, briefly performed oral sex on her, and asked her to do the same thing to him. She did, but not for long. “It was really quick. Everything was pretty much touched and done within ten minutes of hooking up, except for actual sex.”

Hard nope out. You're both naked and she's telling you to chill? Big red flag. Absolutely verbal. Absolutely explicit. That's not a cue. That's a hard no. Relocate to couch and start over. Naked back massage for her, maybe. Then straight to oral sex?

Actually this is one of the problems I saw with the piece, it is not a direct quote. What if she said "Help me relax for a sec?" The piece is littered with these problems that make a lot of her actions ambiguous or just unknown. I have no doubt on her thoughts but most of her actions are made to be too ambiguous (note: I only read it once and don't plan to read it again).

I keep on bringing this up because this entire thing has bothered me a great deal - not because I have any attachment to Ansari (I've never seen his stuff) but because I think that the piece is too poorly written to be a concrete example of much. This attempts to throw someone under the bus while not trying to define what the problem is concretely.

Do we need to confront the variety of pressures on women to act in certain ways - absolutely.

Do we need to teach men how to properly get consent - absolutely.

Does a world where incidents like this are considered "bad experience" and occur often need to change - absolutely.

cheeze_pavilion wrote:

Even if these are grey areas, that's still a problem, and here's why: for sake of argument, let's say pushing into 'grey areas' a couple of times is an understandable mistake. If you keep pushing into 'grey areas' over and over, though, that's not a mistake. That's willful ignorance at best, and a slimy, intentional tactic at worst.

For the record I mean grey areas as in the story is not concrete, as my example above shows "said something like..." doesn't mean anything more than she meant to say one thing but wasn't sure what was actually said. It is poor writing.