Has anyone seen the Shutter Island movie trailer?

Sandvich
Donator V3.0
heavyfeul's picture
Location: Behind an Iron Curtain of bullets

Because I have seen it a THOUSAND TIMES!

I was curious about the movie, but now I am so sick of seeing the trailer I am losing my mind. Maybe it is just how I consume my media, but I have seen the trailer more than any other trailer ever. I'm sick of it and I have lost all interest in seeing the movie. I'm done.

XBL: heavyfeul | Steam: heavyfeul | PSN: heavyfeul

Toilet Gamer
Donator V3.0
Jonman's picture
Location: Seattle, where the weather is unlikely to kill you.

Funny - my response to the thread title was going to be

"Only like a THOUSAND times".

First saw it during the IMAX screening of Watchmen, and that was almost a year ago.

To be fair, Wikipedia says that the release date of the movie slipped from October '09 to Feb '10. So there's another 4 months of being subjected to the trailer that wasn't planned.

XBL: Spiffing Wotwot
LarryC wrote:

Farting is also a good sign....If you're not farting, you've got a big, big problem.

Marks The Spot
Donator V6.0
Elliottx's picture
Location: Portland, OR, USA, Earth, Milky Way, Universe 2

I just want it to be released so I don't have to see the trailer anymore. It has now invaded random website ads.

XBL: elliottxW
Steam: Elliottx

Indecisive
Donator V4.0
Funkenpants's picture
Location: Generic suburb

I, too, have seen it a thousand times. And every time I do I think of the book and say to my wife, "Nothing against Leonardo DiCaprio, but he's not right for that role." So now my wife has heard me say the same thing 1,000 times and hates me for it.

Thanks, Shutter Island movie trailer. You've total messed up my marriage.

TGIF
Donator V5.0
Thirteenth's picture
Location: Washington DC

Just pretty much every time I went to the movie theater since January last year. And everytime I watched a trailer on Gametrailers.com. Sometimes I see it on youtube. Yeah, I've seen it.

"Alas, this Court's kingdom for a commercial airport! "

Line Man
Donator
7inchsplit's picture
Location: Oakland, CA

Yeah, the trailer kind of shows an annoying amount of stuff, like when DiCaprio and Ruffalo are in the white inmates suits. However, this bit from the AV Club review totally sold me on seeing it, despite the mediocre-for-Scorcese Rotten Tomatoes score of 65%:

AV Club wrote:
Using every tool at his disposal, Scorsese honors Lehane’s pulp intensity by amplifying the story to the fevered Grand Guignol of a Park Chan-wook movie, or Sam Fuller’s asylum classic Shock Corridor.

Steam ID: Magmarok || Twitter: jakemix || SC2: Magmarok.250
Illustration Portfolio / www.jakemix.com

lime pickle
VDOWhoNeedsDD's picture
Location: Reading, UK

I'm interested in seeing it, if only because Di Caprio has rather impressed me with his most recent films that I have seen. However, I too have heard that the trailer ruins the movie. Which SUCKS, because I was completely looking forward to it I still think it's worth an Orange Wednesday ticket at some point in the future though. You had me at Grand Guignol

Ratboy wrote:

I liked it better when I thought she was speaking in tongues. Cute tongues, but tongues nonetheless.

Nosferatu wrote:

Guys! Quit trying to get VDO to play doctor with you!

Countless Wounded
Donator
93_confirmed's picture
Location: United [Police] States of America

I've seen so many trailers that there's no point in watching. Just slice them all together in one reel and you have about 70% of the important scenes in the film. I'll probably wait till this comes out on DVD.

Junior Executive
RoughneckGeek's picture
Location: Denver, CO

Lo and behold.. I hop into the "Everything Else" section and find this thread about my favorite new drinking game.

katisu wrote:

RoughneckGeek: youre classier than Q-Stone !

PSN: Weylin | Steam: RoughneckGeek

Countless Wounded
Donator
93_confirmed's picture
Location: United [Police] States of America

This is hard to believe but I actually saw 4 trailers for the movie (each had different footage and length) within a single 5 minute commerical break on VH1 around 9pm tonight. 4 trailers....seriously?

Silverback? Please, Goldback.
KingGorilla's picture
Location: Detroit

I cannot blame a studio for wanting this to be the year's first blockbuster.

But to be honest, all I had to see was Scorsese and I was hooked. The man has had only 2 misses, in my opinion. I plan on attending the cinema Saturday to watch it.

Done professionally
MaverickDago's picture

Sadly, if you really listen to the trailer, it spoils the ending.

Spoiler:
as you hear him called his real name, probably in the doc's office at the end

Rock Chalk
Donator V6.0
Jayhawker's picture
Location: New Austin

Yea, I've seen it a bunch, as well. I think Leonardo DiCaprio seems like a decent fit. He gives off the same vibe I got from Mickey Roarke in Angel Heart.

But Scorsese makes it an easy choice to check out.

Xbox Live: JayhawkerStL
I know, it's sad that I never gave a damn about Tim Tebow. And he never gave a damn about me.

Wiener Bombardier
Donator V6.0
Podunk's picture
Location: The People's Republic of Goodge

Yeah, f*ck that trailer. I am sick to death of it.

Can you dig it?
Donator V3.0
Latrine's picture

we ah doolee appointed fehduhral maashaals

lime pickle
VDOWhoNeedsDD's picture
Location: Reading, UK

Latrine wrote:
we ah doolee appointed fehduhral maashaals

Yes, there is that.

Ratboy wrote:

I liked it better when I thought she was speaking in tongues. Cute tongues, but tongues nonetheless.

Nosferatu wrote:

Guys! Quit trying to get VDO to play doctor with you!

Office Jester
Donator V7.0
ColdForged's picture
Location: Cary, NC

It's been proven that there's one guy on a mountain top in the Hengduan Shan mountain range in Burma who hasn't seen it. He's the last one. Sherpas -- armed with oxygen bottles and a 2nd-gen 32GB iPod Touch -- are right now staging a desperate attempt to reach him and rectify this situation. Please keep them in your thoughts.

"THE HELL ASS BALLS." - Prederick, expressing frustration in the time-honored way.

coldforged.org :: Stay fit, Dad!

Indecisive
Donator V4.0
Funkenpants's picture
Location: Generic suburb

A few weeks ago, they started beaming the trailer out into outer space, just in case someone is listening out there...

Junior Executive
RoughneckGeek's picture
Location: Denver, CO

ColdForged wrote:
It's been proven that there's one guy on a mountain top in the Hengduan Shan mountain range in Burma who hasn't seen it. He's the last one. Sherpas -- armed with oxygen bottles and a 2nd-gen 32GB iPod Touch -- are right now staging a desperate attempt to reach him and rectify this situation. Please keep them in your thoughts.

Random mountain hiker guy has been exposed. I was able to grab this picture of the footage:

katisu wrote:

RoughneckGeek: youre classier than Q-Stone !

PSN: Weylin | Steam: RoughneckGeek

Massively Polished
Donator
UCRC's picture
Location: in the dining car, eavesdropping on multilingual conversations

Huh? I've only seen it once and that's because I've been digging through movie trailers on YouTube.

Look at my new manvatar and appreciate the obscure reference!

I'm Allergic To People
Donator V4.0
Kehama's picture
Location: Solo in an MMO

UCRC wrote:
Huh? I've only seen it once and that's because I've been digging through movie trailers on YouTube.

Same here except I saw it on Rotten Tomatoes. I guess it helps that I don't watch any live TV and rarely get to go to a theatre.

Junior Executive
Donator V3.0
VeggiePirate's picture
Location: Portland, OR

Every damn time I open the Hulu app, it defaults to this damn trailer. The worst part is, I have to restart it between shows lately, so I've had to see it OVER AND OVER again. UGH@#%!

Silverback? Please, Goldback.
KingGorilla's picture
Location: Detroit

So, I saw the movie tod...yesterday. I enjoyed myself. I felt it languished on a tad. The "twist" is predictable, but that really is of no consequence. The movie is a case study in Leo's character and in Ben Kingsley. I am not going to tell you to rush out and see this quick, but certainly at least pop it in your Netflix Queue. I would much rather you rush out and see Creation.

Declaring Martian Law
SpacePPoliceman's picture
Location: Up the River

KingGorilla wrote:
So, I saw the movie tod...yesterday. I enjoyed myself. I felt it languished on a tad. The "twist" is predictable, but that really is of no consequence. The movie is a case study in Leo's character and in Ben Kingsley. I am not going to tell you to rush out and see this quick, but certainly at least pop it in your Netflix Queue. I would much rather you rush out and see Creation.

I saw it too, and thought it was fine. No Goodfellas, but Scorsese deserves to have some fun too. He composed some really great imagery, it actually almost felt like he'd just come in and say "I wanna do a scene where a woman turns to ash," or "I wanna do a scene with this Earle Haley guy everyone's talking about." Not to say it doesn't hold together. Like you said, KG, the twist is predictable, but there's a secondary twist attached to it I didn't see coming, and it's all fairly played.

PSN: SpacePPoliceman
Unsound Methods: The latest: What we lose when we lose Chuck.

Why am I still playing at 4 AM?
Donator V3.0
Sparhawk's picture
Location: Curacao, Caribbean

I try to evade all information up front, once I think I really want to see a movie.
Caught a few seconds of this trailer and turned it off right away. Yes, definitely a movie
I want to watch!

|Twitter|Steam|TF2 Items|
“We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.”

Silverback? Please, Goldback.
KingGorilla's picture
Location: Detroit

I do want to say, between this and The Brothers Bloom, just when did Mark Ruffalo become such a good actor?

Office Linebacker
Donator
jonstock's picture

He was already pretty great in "You Can Count on Me", which is maybe 10 years old. That movie's a must-see, by the way--Laura Linney's even better than Ruffalo.

Steam ID: jonstock

Short for Speedhunter
Donator V3.0
Speedhuntr's picture
Location: Mariposa, CA

SpacePPoliceman wrote:
KingGorilla wrote:
So, I saw the movie tod...yesterday. I enjoyed myself. I felt it languished on a tad. The "twist" is predictable, but that really is of no consequence. The movie is a case study in Leo's character and in Ben Kingsley. I am not going to tell you to rush out and see this quick, but certainly at least pop it in your Netflix Queue. I would much rather you rush out and see Creation.

I saw it too, and thought it was fine. No Goodfellas, but Scorsese deserves to have some fun too. He composed some really great imagery, it actually almost felt like he'd just come in and say "I wanna do a scene where a woman turns to ash," or "I wanna do a scene with this Earle Haley guy everyone's talking about." Not to say it doesn't hold together. Like you said, KG, the twist is predictable, but there's a secondary twist attached to it I didn't see coming, and it's all fairly played.

I must be an idiot because I was shocked about it. But after it happened, I was waiting for the "double twist" that never came around...which was interesting.

Did the music grate you all as it did me? Especially in the opening sequence where they're driving up to the institution from the dock. It was superfluous if I ever knew the sense of the word.

imbiginjapan on Vanquish:The difficulty is punishing but it knows enough to punish me while wearing stiletto heels and a push up bra, so I forgive it.

Consultant
Donator V3.0
DrSugardaddy's picture

Speedhuntr wrote:
Did the music grate you all as it did me? Especially in the opening sequence where they're driving up to the institution from the dock. It was superfluous if I ever knew the sense of the word.

I think it's supposed to grate on the viewer and didn't experience it as superfluous. After all,
Spoiler:
the entire movie is basically shot from the perspective of a psychotic character. The soundtrack (and conspicuous lack thereof, in places) serves to heighten the unnerving, paranoid atmosphere of the piece.

And Ruffalo has been great for a long time. Sometimes he picks scripts that don't highlight his range and skill as well as others do.

All your sietch are belong to us
Donator V6.0
Fedaykin98's picture
Location: Houston, TX

I just saw it this afternoon. Right now I'm giving it 3 Netflix stars ("I liked it.") This is in comparison to the 4 star ("I really liked it!") DVDs that I watched this weekend, 500 Days of Summer and Moon.

It's a solid movie, and as my aunt said, keeps your attention, but when my wife asked if I was glad I went, it was hard to answer. I really wanted to see it, so there you go.

I will say in response to DrSugarDaddy that

Spoiler:
in my opinion, the movie is intentionally ambiguous as to whether Dicaprio is psycho, or whether he has accepted his drug-induced programming from Kingsley and friends. Thinking back on so many scenes, like the interviews with the inmates, it really works either way - which I think is the genius of this film.

Not really sure when or if I'll ever watch it again, though. Might be a film that grows on me over time, might just be a decent way to spend one Sunday afternoon, and that's it.

Quote:

I plan to have Logan sit in for me when I am on my honeymoon.

- Legion, keeping it frighteningly in the family.
---
The littlest fremen.

Consultant
Donator V3.0
DrSugardaddy's picture

Fedaykin98 wrote:

I will say in response to DrSugarDaddy that
Spoiler:
in my opinion, the movie is intentionally ambiguous as to whether Dicaprio is psycho, or whether he has accepted his drug-induced programming from Kingsley and friends. Thinking back on so many scenes, like the interviews with the inmates, it really works either way - which I think is the genius of this film.

Spoiler:
I think it's a stretch to say that the end can be interpreted either way, and I'll tell you why. If Edward Daniels is real, and not a psychotic delusion created by Andrew Laeddis, then we're supposed to believe that the entire island is a government project to create the perfect black-ops agent--a man with no memory or cognition beyond that which is assigned to him by his masters. If this is true, then the end seems to suggest that they failed. Real Edward Daniels did not believe he was unreal Andrew Laeddis despite the byzantine brainwashing scheme that had been employed to facilitate this belief.

So why lobotomize Edward Daniels, then? All a trans-orbital lobotomy will accomplish is to turn him into a drooling zombie and destroy his viability as a continued experimental subject. The conspiracy members have demonstrated that they can hold him at Ashcliff indefinitely to keep their nefarious plan from ever being revealed. Further, there's nothing shown in the film that rules out them continuing to use him as a test subject. They're not exactly conducting research that will be published and have to withstand the rigors of peer review. For this interpretation to be true, you have to buy into the idea that their efforts are true "mad scientist"-type stuff. No one will ever argue that their methodology is flawed because Edward Daniels was biased or tainted as a subject by his previous exposure to a failed intervention, so there's no reason to destroy a potential test subject. Even if they consider him dangerous and unpredictable, the facilities on the island seem to be more than capable of restraining him thoroughly, if not humanely, so that they can continue to experiment on him.

On the other hand, the interpretation that Andrew Laeddis is the real persona, and that he is a violent paranoid schizophrenic who had a psychotic break after the combined horrors of WWII and his wife and childrens' deaths is a virtually textbook portrayal of such a patient. His lobotomization at the end makes much more sense in this context, as his care-providers have realized that, despite the most rigorous efforts at their disposal, he continues to accept his delusion. Moreover, this continued acceptance will predictably lead to violent behavior that cannot be tolerated when considering his safety and that of others.

Given all this, I think there's less room for ambiguity at the end than it seems you do. Much like The Sixth Sense, I think the twist in Shutter Island is a one-way street. The "ah-ha!" moment in both of them is not meant to be interpreted multiple ways, it's meant to make the viewer see the previous scenes a whole new context. Unfortunately, it's a technique that I personally think has been played out for a long time now, and I think the latter movie would have had much more cinematic punch without the former movie (and it's other derivatives such as The Others).

I'd like to hear more of your thought on this, though.