Amethyst vs MADD: Should college kids drink?

Executive
Location: Southwest MI

Forgive me if this was posted prior, I did some prelim searching and couldn't find it.

This article goes over how a large collection of college presidents, having dubbed themselves the Amethyst Initiative, are trying to change a Federal law tying giving state highway funds to keeping the legal drinking age at 21. Obviously, their goal is to lower the drinking age to 18.

Their reasoning is thus: studies and reports show that the overwhelming majority of American late teens (and teens worldwide) have extensive experience with alcohol prior to turning 21. This is normal worldwide and the statistics in America are no different despite it being illegal here. Colleges are hoping that by lowering the drinking age, they can more proactively monitor and mitigate potentially life threatening conditions caused by alcohol poisoning, by bringing it out into the open.

Mother Against Drunk Driving (MADD) of course, is flipping out over this, claiming that the Amethyst Initiative is a lazy, stupid organization that is intentionally mis interpreting studies in order to get out of the admittedly arduous task of policing underage drinking. Their number one statistic (which Amethyst disputes) is that lowering the drinking age significantly lowers drunk driving fatalities. Amethyst claims this statistic shows up as a correlation in about half the studies performed; the other half there is no correlation at all.

So what do you think? Remember that baby boomers could drink at 18, and that currently there are boys and girls dying for our country that legally aren't allowed a drop of alcohol. Do you think we should lower the drinking age or not?

[edit] for typos.

I Am The Greetest!
Donator
KaterinLHC's picture
Location: On the moon. Whaling.

I think it's utterly ridiculous that you can vote, buy cigarettes, be tried as an adult in a court of law and die for your country at 18 - but you can't buy beer for three more years. I'm 100% in favor of reducing the drinking age back to 18. (In fact, I'm 100% in favor of eliminating a federally mandated drinking age altogether. What right does the government have to tell me what I can and cannot put into my body, as long as I'm not hurting anyone else?)

As for drunk driving, well, there are already laws against driving while intoxicated. In my mind, a federal drinking age only undermines the power of those laws; after all, if the DUI laws work, then why do we need even more laws restricting access to alcohol? Either the DUI laws don't work and need to be retooled; or they do work and further legislation is unnecessary.

"Today's Tom Sawyer, he gets high on you, Kat. You." - Haakon7

My Website v. 3.0

Optimus Primate
Gorilla.800.lbs's picture
Location: New York, NY

I have no problem with lowering the legal drinking age to 18.

Quote:
As for drunk driving, well, there are already laws against driving while intoxicated. In my mind, a federal drinking age only undermines the power of those laws; after all, if the DUI laws work, then why do we need even more laws restricting access to alcohol? Either the DUI laws don't work and need to be retooled; or they do work and further legislation is unnecessary.

I have no problem with additional, stiffer penalties for drunk driving. Say, it is also already illegal to kill people. You'd get prosecuted for that alright. But you'll be prosecuted even more severely if you kill someone with an illegaly owned weapon.

Xbox Live tag Gorilla800lbs

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

This is a subject near and dear to my heart. As I've said countless times before, I was an RA in college and alcohol was always a huge issue. On the one hand, I needed my residents to know they could trust me if they got in over their head and needed help (I did have to call some ambulances). On the other, my employer expected me to report ANY drinking at all (it was a dry dorm) and residents caught drinking would lose housing. About 8 students died from alcohol poisoning or alcohol-related incidents during my first year as an RA (thankfully, none on my watch though most were off campus so I don't blame their RAs at all). I hate binge drinking, I hate what it does to people, and I hate that it's such an important part of college culture.

That said, this proposal is one of the stupidest f***ing things I've ever heard in my life. In my experience, the reason students binge drink isn't because it's illegal (though many do drink ridiculous amounts on their 21st birthday to celebrate the law's acknowledgment of their maturity). They drink because they just got away from Mom and Dad and most of them are moving from a tightly controlled environment with relatively severe and direct consequences (groundings) to a much less controlled one with rather abstract ones (getting "written up," hearings, etc.). Age 18 is precisely when this change happens!

I think the idea is sound and that Europe has shown us that binge drinking is related to drinking being a taboo; people who grow up with a glass of wine at dinner often don't understand why Americans delight in drinking until they vomit and pass out. What we need to do is drop the legal drinking age to 16 or below, or abolish it entirely. Give kids a few years to learn how to drink in the safe, closely supervised environment of their own home. Let them go to college knowing their limits.

The only thing this proposal will do is decrease the workload for RAs and campus police who no longer have to deal with underaged drinking. It won't help the binge drinking problem in the slightest.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Optimus Primate
Gorilla.800.lbs's picture
Location: New York, NY

Quote:
I think the idea is sound and that Europe has shown us that binge drinking is related to drinking being a taboo; people who grow up with a glass of wine at dinner often don't understand why Americans delight in drinking until they vomit and pass out.

I agree with you entirely, but would like to note, just for the sake of a counter-perspective, that in Russia, people frow up with a glass (or more) of wine or vodka on the dinner table, and the drinking age restriction there is 16, yet they DO delight in drinking until they vomit and pass out just as well.

Xbox Live tag Gorilla800lbs

Intern

MADD is against drunk drivers, not drunk teens. They see making it legal for more people to drink will lead to more drunk drivers, which isn't a bad assumption. I think the best argument against MADD is that there are already people under 21 that drink and drive, so lowering the age to 18 won't affect much.

bnpederson wrote:

Whatever else you do, don't stick it in the crazy.

Executive
Location: Southwest MI

Quote:
The only thing this proposal will do is decrease the workload for RAs and campus police who no longer have to deal with underaged drinking. It won't help the binge drinking problem in the slightest.

I think your supporting points are spot on - -and I 100% wholeheartedly agree with abolishing the drinking limit completely or moving it to 15 or 16, I'm going to disagree with the conclusion.

I think even a "middle step" like allowing drinking at 18 would vastly reduce the amount of alcohol poisonings on a campus, and here's why: If *everyone* on campus can dirnk, then College can sponsor parties and closely monitor alcohol intake of everyone there. If you have uniformed police officers there for safety and NOT to pass out MIPs, you re define the role of the police officer from persecutor to protector, and you maintain a balance between, as you said, the limits of home-life and the freedoms of college life.

[edit] for typos.

To Serve Man
Donator V3.0
CannibalCrowley's picture
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

KaterinLHC wrote:
In fact, I'm 100% in favor of eliminating a federally mandated drinking age altogether.

What federal drinking age?

Executive
Location: Southwest MI

CannibalCrowley wrote:
KaterinLHC wrote:
In fact, I'm 100% in favor of eliminating a federally mandated drinking age altogether.

What federal drinking age?

These statements are both true:

1) There is no federally mandated drinking age.

2) There is a federally mandated drinking age.

explanation: states have the right to set the drinking age to whatever they want -- but if they don't set it to 21 or higher, they lose 10% of their federal highway and road repair money. That's millions and millions of dollars. MADD's powerful lobbyists are basically blackmailing states into ponying up to the age 21 rule.

If I come off as anti MADD, it's because I view them as little other than an opportunistic special interest group devoted to exploiting the tragedies of others for political gain.

[edit] for typos.

Junior Executive
Donator
Serengeti's picture
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

I think that the drinking age should be lowered to 18, and the driving age be raised to 21. Let the kids get past the binge drinking phase and then teach them to drive.

Of course, I'd have absolutely hated that idea when I was 18, and my logic may be totally off base, but that's the way I see it.

Executive
Location: Southwest MI

Serengeti wrote:
I think that the drinking age should be lowered to 18, and the driving age be raised to 21. Let the kids get past the binge drinking phase and then teach them to drive.

I'm writing before researching (always bad) but isn't this how most of europe does it? If I recall, you can't drive in Germany till your'e 18 but you can drink at 16.

[edit] for typos.

Discretion is not the better part of
Donator V4.0
Malor's picture
Location: Perpetually suspended

I've always been in favor of an age-18 drinking law. I was favor of that at about 16, and it never changed.

Why? Because if you can be forced to die for your country, you're an adult. There is no better definition. If you can be drafted (or volunteer, for that matter), you sure as hell should be able to drink. If you're responsible enough to be given control of some of the deadliest weapons in the world, you can, I think, be trusted with a jar of suds.

As far as the culture of binge drinking goes; I dunno what that is. I did plenty of drinking, both before and after 21. I thoroughly enjoyed getting plastered, but I never drank to the point of passing out or puking. I never really understood the thinking of those that did. It was obviously important to some to drink until you hurled, but I didn't get why. Still don't.

Wonder if it might be a genetic thing?

Junior Executive
Donator
Serengeti's picture
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

Seth wrote:
Serengeti wrote:
I think that the drinking age should be lowered to 18, and the driving age be raised to 21. Let the kids get past the binge drinking phase and then teach them to drive.

I'm writing before researching (always bad) but isn't this how most of europe does it? If I recall, you can't drive in Germany till your'e 18 but you can drink at 16.

16/18 probably makes more sense than my suggestion.

This may be a bit off topic, but I think that the situational awareness skills, and maturity level required to be safe on the road simply isn't sufficiently developed yet for most 16 year olds, which is what the current driving age is in Iowa. Hell, it's probably not there for most 18 year olds either, so I don't understand why the driving age is the way it is in America. The relative simplicity of the driving tests doesn't help either. Considering the amount of responsibility you take on when you hop in a car and head out on the road, realistically, the whole system is broken.

My personal belief is that driving tests need to be much more difficult to pass, and should have to be repeated at least every 2 years. There are too many people on the road now that have no right to be there, regardless of whether they've been drinking or not.

To Serve Man
Donator V3.0
CannibalCrowley's picture
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Seth wrote:
explanation: states have the right to set the drinking age to whatever they want -- but if they don't set it to 21 or higher, they lose 10% of their federal highway and road repair money.

That's incorrect. The poorly named National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 actually concerns the age for "purchase and public possession". It's legal for those under 21 to consume alcohol in several states.

Exceptions to Minimum Age of 21 for Consumption of Alcohol as of January 1, 2007

http://alcoholpolicy.niaaa.nih.gov/index.asp?Type=BAS_APIS&SEC={0D5C719E-FCE8-4E15-A367-4145C655505F}&DE={E6F19624-0ADC-437F-917D-5E7CBC9F58B9}

Executive
MaverickDago's picture

Quote:
. About 8 students died from alcohol poisoning or alcohol-related incidents during my first year as an RA (thankfully, none on my watch though most were off campus so I don't blame their RAs at all).

Jesus christ, what college did you RA at. I went to whats considered a party university, and we didn't lose that many in 4 years. Must have been a tough gig at that college being a RA, god know I harrassed the sh*t of mine freshman year.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

Seth, it'd be nice if the campus would provide that kind of supervision but there's no way it'll happen. The last weekend of every school year would be a MASSIVE party, entire parking lots full of people ALL binging (my final year, the ambulances started showing up 15 minutes after the party started and 2 cars were flipped over), and the university would hand out plastic cups in an effort to take broken glass out of the equation.

Can you imagine the outrage if a university actually sponsored a drinking party? They'd be encouraging drinking. Would they be supplying the alcohol? Were I a student going into severe debt in order to pay tuition, I would not be happy about that. Were I a parent, I would be appalled.

Maverick, I was an RA at the main UCONN campus in Storrs. It was very rough at times, especially my first year as an RA. In fact, on 9/11 I had been an RA all of 1 month and I was on duty that day. That was a nightmare.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Executive
MaverickDago's picture

Quote:
Seth, it'd be nice if the campus would provide that kind of supervision but there's no way it'll happen. The last weekend of every school year would be a MASSIVE party, entire parking lots full of people ALL binging (my final year, the ambulances started showing up 15 minutes after the party started and 2 cars were flipped over), and the university would hand out plastic cups in an effort to take broken glass out of the equation.

Or have it in fall, call it homecoming and consider it a given at any school with a football program.

Office Linebacker
inspiringsn's picture
Location: Indianapolis/West Lafayette, IN

LobsterMobster wrote:
The only thing this proposal will do is decrease the workload for RAs and campus police who no longer have to deal with underaged drinking. It won't help the binge drinking problem in the slightest.

I find this point interesting because I'm currently in training as an RA and this will be my third year as an RA. There may be less paperwork in the short run but I'm somewhat concerned about people taking advantage of the lowered age and then abusing it. This isn't necessarily a sound reason for not allowing it, but just a concern of mine.

Also, I think with college life the amount of free time and variable level of responsibilities of a college student, the culture is much more conducive to binge drink as opposed to trying to hold down a steady job with a family etc.

On a more selfish note, I don't think I want freshmen at my campus bars because they are so inexperienced in most cases. That and they are rather crowded as it is. But what can you do?

Steam ID: ihateuyeahu WAR: Inspirant (Ironrock)
Xbox Live: ihateuyeahu BNet: idislikeumildly

Bilge Cat
Donator V2.0
Farscry's picture
Location: Commanding at the Helm

The one thing about college that I absolutely hated was all the imbecilic binge drinkers. I never understood their need to drink to the point of idiocy to be able to "have fun". Those people desperately needed to get a life.

Sadly, they're what are referred to as the "majority" in a democracy.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

inspiringsn wrote:
I find this point interesting because I'm currently in training as an RA and this will be my third year as an RA.

Good luck. I don't envy you.

Farscry wrote:
The one thing about college that I absolutely hated was all the imbecilic binge drinkers. I never understood their need to drink to the point of idiocy to be able to "have fun". Those people desperately needed to get a life.

Sadly, they're what are referred to as the "majority" in a democracy.

Whenever I took the campus bus I would inevitably hear other students talking about how drunk they got, or how they were looking forward to getting drunk, or how they just got paid so they could buy a couple 30 packs. I usually walked to and from class.

Once I was in a cafeteria and I heard one student point me out to his friend because I "narc'd" on him. He was one of those "ambulance calls" I mentioned earlier. So I walked over to him and I said, "Look, I have nothing against you, I just didn't want you to die." He seemed a little surprised... but probably more that he was heard than in any sort of realization of his own mortality.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Executive
Location: Southwest MI

Quote:
Once I was in a cafeteria and I heard one student point me out to his friend because I "narc'd" on him. He was one of those "ambulance calls" I mentioned earlier. So I walked over to him and I said, "Look, I have nothing against you, I just didn't want you to die." He seemed a little surprised... but probably more that he was heard than in any sort of realization of his own mortality.

Holy crap that's gratitude for you.

My RA "narced" on me my freshman year -- but I had consumed a fifth of tequila cowboy style and she and my roommates quite literally saved my life. Suffice it to say that my gratitude toward them will never diminish. Also I don't drink tequila anymore. =)

And crowley, thanks for that tool, that's extremely helpful.

More on topic: I think the fear of having college sponsored events turn into MTV Spring Break is very legitimate, but could be averted. Imagine if you had a social event where a cash bar was available and plenty of cops / security were on hand to safely deal with people causing an unsafe or inappropriate environment for people. I'm envisioning that these would look more like Catholic weddings (I'm Catholic, I can make the generalization!) than a Girls Gone Wild tape -- sure, some people will get a little too grabby or rowdy, but you'll always have uncle lester there to put the kibosh on inappropriate behavior.

PROBLEM: Alcohol causes a lot of unintended sexual encounters, and a lot of unprotected sexual encounters. At these school sponsored parties you'd better be using all the profits from alcohol to puirchase condoms.

[edit] for typos.

Junior Executive
Donator
Serengeti's picture
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

I think a lot of problems with binge drinking stem from the fact that most kids have not been introduced to drinking in a controlled manner. If the law and parents keep a wall between kids and alcohol until the age of 21, the kids aren't going to have any experience to fall back on. Their first experiences with alcohol will be with others of the same age with similarly non-existent levels of experience. You essentially have the blind leading the blind, and that's always a recipe for disaster.

In Iowa, it is legal for persons under the age of 21 to drink with parents present and consenting, and my 18 year old son has been partaking of some drink with me since he turned 18. This has the advantage of him learning his limits in a controlled environment, as well as appreciation for good alcohol. Of course, when he's off to college he'll probably just do what everyone else is doing anyways, but just maybe there will be that little bit of wisdom in the back of his brain that stops him before he goes over the edge.

It's really too bad that alcohol is as vilified as it is. My job is hard enough already, but with maybe 1% of parents teaching the same lesson, there's a lot of other kids that will be working against my teachings. I truly believe that if my approach was more ubiquitous, there would be a lot less binge drinking and a lot more enjoyment of alcohol to boot.

I Am The Greetest!
Donator
KaterinLHC's picture
Location: On the moon. Whaling.

CannibalCrowley wrote:
KaterinLHC wrote:
In fact, I'm 100% in favor of eliminating a federally mandated drinking age altogether.

What federal drinking age?

Woops. I meant government mandated, not federally. Good catch, thanks for pointing out the slip.

"Today's Tom Sawyer, he gets high on you, Kat. You." - Haakon7

My Website v. 3.0

Office Linebacker
Donator
deftly's picture
Location: Apex, NC

misterglass wrote:
MADD is against drunk drivers, not drunk teens.

Not anymore. It's one of the reasons the original founder left the organization. It's become a modern-day prohibition movement.

MADD accomplished their original goals. They got laws with stiff penalties against drunk driving passed everywhere.

Well that was done, so they needed goals. Then they got everyone to lower the threshold for being drunk from .10 to .08. They got the drinking age raised to 21.

OK, now they have a $45 million annual budget. What can they do next? Now they want the threshold lowered to 0, so it would be illegal to drink one beer and go home. Now they want every new car to have an interlock installed as standard equipment so the car won't start if any alcohol is detected. Their stated goals have progressed into the absurd solely so they can justify their continued existence.

WAR: Isembold (Volkmar)

Republican Stormtrooper of Doom
Donator V2.0
Pigpen's picture
Location: SA TX

All subjects near and dear to me. On one hand, lost a brother and a couple friends to drinking and driving. Understand MADD's point...BUT

I'm in the military. The fact you can enlist, go to Iraq, watch your buds die, (or die yourself), and then if you come home, you can't buy beer - that is ludicrous. And in ludicrous, I mean stupid, and in stupid, I mean really f***in' insane.

It's that simple.

Will this lower binge drinking...doubt it.
Will this help campus issues...doubt it.
Will this cause more problems than it solves, like seniors in high school now having easy access for their junior buddies on the team...yup.

BUT still...I challenge any of you to come up with a solid argument that you can die for your country, yet aren't old enough to handle a beer?

Unless you're running out of mana overhealing is the most worthless stat in the game. Underhealing is effectively known as "wiping".

so sayeth the Bear...

Office Linebacker
inspiringsn's picture
Location: Indianapolis/West Lafayette, IN

If only someone could introduce them to some hobbies beyond meddling in other people's lives. But what hobbies would be best...MMO's can get these moms off our backs! Let's start a drive to collect WoW disks to get these people hooked and off our backs!

Steam ID: ihateuyeahu WAR: Inspirant (Ironrock)
Xbox Live: ihateuyeahu BNet: idislikeumildly

Throat Specialist
Donator
Dr.Ghastly's picture

I would support the drinking age age at 18 and driving age at 18. I wouldn't go so far as to say no drivers license until 21 because you would have a lot of illegal drivers instead of bus riders.

Unfortunately, if I slash my wrist with my lightsaber it cauterizes instantly. - PurEvil on emo Star Wars plots.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

Pigpen wrote:
BUT still...I challenge any of you to come up with a solid argument that you can die for your country, yet aren't old enough to handle a beer?

I agree that it's ridiculous, but I'd think some people might say that serving your country is positive and helpful to community and country whereas getting drunk is not. Or to be cynical, it's in the interests of the people making the laws that 18-year-olds can serve but not drink.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

Dr.Ghastly wrote:
I would support the drinking age age at 18 and driving age at 18. I wouldn't go so far as to say no drivers license until 21 because you would have a lot of illegal drivers instead of bus riders.

I'll agree with that. People need to work, which usually means they need to drive. They'll drive whether they're licensed or not and whether they're insured or not because, well, they've got to get to work.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Executive
Location: Southwest MI

Quote:
I agree that it's ridiculous, but I'd think some people might say that serving your country is positive and helpful to community and country whereas getting drunk is not. Or to be cynical, it's in the interests of the people making the laws that 18-year-olds can serve but not drink.

I think it's important to note that it's illegal (at least in my state) to be publically *drunk* no matter what age you are.

I think we really need to differentiate between enjoying a beer with your meal, or having a glass of scotch with your buddies, and playing Edward 40-Hands.

[edit] for typos.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

Restrictive laws are typically not aimed at responsible people. If some 16-year-old has a single beer while fishing with Dad, no one's going to know anyway. And if no one ever got shot we wouldn't have age restrictions on buying handguns.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore