The REAL Reason Hillary's losing: she's not, it's a cover-up!

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

Link

So it looks like Bill's saying that Hillary is in fact winning, but there's a massive conspiracy to conceal that "fact." No names are named, of course (or if they were, then THEY made sure they weren't reported).

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Not Without Incident
Donator V3.0
Quintin_Stone's picture
Location: Cary, NC

So it's a vast what-wing conspiracy?

Fedaykin98 wrote:

Good lord, I wouldn't have expected brilliance like that from that nemeslut Quintin Stone!

wordsmythe wrote:
I know I'm not terribly cool

Rifle Lovin Whore
Donator
Mayfield's picture
Location: Running around in circles trying to get a nut

So, she is winning if you take the caucus states and the votes from them out of the equation, and if you count Michigan and Florida, and you give Obama zero votes for Michigan. Ok sure Bill lets not let a few states get in the way of your wife's political victory.

Playing WoW as: Vilius (70 NE Druid)

“The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.” John K Galbraith

Hi Rez, Low Maintenance
Donator V5.0
Rezzy's picture
Location: Casino Bluffs, Iowa

.... sure, you may not like her policies... but she could win! And you wanna pick a winner, right? You don't wanna gamble, do ya son. No. Not with something as important as your vote! You wanna back a horse that can run the whole race! Ooops! Did I say race? Listen, come here, have you been working out? Let me lay this on the line for you: I've got numbers. Numbers that say she's a shoo-in! No really! Here... Polls! Yeah. See? Look at those numbers. See that? That column there. Yeah, now look over here. Why didn't you know that before? Huh? Who's keeping these numbers from you? So you see now? You don't wanna throw your vote against THAT brick wall, do ya? Listen here, these numbers are never wrong. Point is... She can win! And you want to win. We like winners! Just think what'll happen if you pick wrong again. Remember Dean? Yearrhoo indeed! And now he wants to tell you where to throw your vote? So forget about the policies, forget about the tactics. You know what she's willing to do, who she's willing to step over to get the job done. Ruthless like... you ever see 24? Yeah. She'll kneecap that sucker and get us the big W. The big "W" is what we want in the White House. Right? Yeah. Hill on the Hill. Hmm... sounds like a video I saw back when I was a governor. Hmmmm... listen hun, once this is all over how 'bout you and m.... Yes dear? Oh yeah, ehem... So, Support Hillary.

It feels like a Monday.

Politely rude. Briskly vague. Firmly uninformative.

Do I Make You Thorny Baby?
Donator
Alien Love Gardener's picture
Location: Effin' Finland

Quintin_Stone wrote:
So it's a vast what-wing conspiracy?

I think it's the infamous reality-wing. Those goddamn reality-based people ruin everything.

"The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all."

Once you go blue...
Donator
Morro's picture
Location: Waiting for the day of rockening.

I'm waiting for it to become Bush's fault that she can't win.

"PEACE ON EARTH. GOOD WILL TO MEN. PUBLIC SHELTER. ADMISSION 50¢"

Me Love You Long Time
Donator V4.0
Vector's picture
Location: The Wet Coast

Anyone else picturing a sitcom with Bill sneaking around Hillary's back, getting into all kinds of humourous situations? He just needs Al Gore to accompany him on his wacky adventures. This would be the second season though. The first would be and the whole impeachment fiasco.

McChuck wrote:

rabbit wrote:
Spaz wrote:
It's weird who you meat during ConSeason, aint it?

Paging douchebag community copyeditors on aisle 3. McChuck? Wordsmythe?

Oh, c'mon. You suck one c*ck and you're forever known as a c*cksucker.

Marks The Spot
Donator V3.0
Elliottx's picture
Location: Vancouver, WA, USA, Earth, Milky Way

I could've sworn that I went into some little elementary school and stood for an hour and a half in a cafeteria so I could vote for Obama but according to the Clintons, that never took place. My vote for Obama doesn't count in the popular vote because I loved my country enough to waste my Saturday afternoon in a cramped little corner of the room.

I think saying that I didn't vote is a cover-up.

XBL: elliottxW
MMO Aliases: Jozak or Ezzamar

Wiener Bombardier
Donator V4.0
Podunk's picture
Location: The People's Republic of Goodge

Hey Hillary:

And I say that in the most non-sexist way possible.

Xbox Live: CrankyBaby

baggachipz: Who cares about Japan, let them have their silly pointless dog games and countless re-hashes of anime-based dragon princess super lucky crapitty crap.

Got Blood?
Donator V4.0
Nosferatu's picture

Morrolan wrote:
I'm waiting for it to become Bush's fault that she can't win.

I'm waiting for her to blame it on Rush Limbaugh personally...

"Also, I have four legs and am covered in wool. Baa!" *Legion* reveals his inner furry.

Optimus Primate
Gorilla.800.lbs's picture
Location: New York, NY

Wouldn't it be awesome if Hillary ends up sueing DNC and seeks injunction on Obama accepting the nomination? The situation begins to looks as if it would make a perfect Supreme Court material!

Xbox Live tag Gorilla800lbs

Indecisive
Donator V4.0
Funkenpants's picture

Nosferatu wrote:
Morrolan wrote:
I'm waiting for it to become Bush's fault that she can't win.

I'm waiting for her to blame it on Rush Limbaugh personally...

She likes Rush Limbaugh now. It's the liberal media she can't stand because they're all out to get her.

MMMMAGGOTS!
Donator
nsmike's picture
Location: Pennsylvania

Gorilla.800.lbs wrote:
Wouldn't it be awesome if Hillary ends up sueing DNC and seeks injunction on Obama accepting the nomination? The situation begins to looks as if it would make a perfect Supreme Court material!

Jeebus you people keep coming up with the scariest ways that she just won't back down from this... First running as independent... Now this... *shudder* + *jibbilies*

XBL: NSMike | Steam | PSN: NSMike | Wii Friend Code: 7763 1519 2475 2278 | GWJ Google Calendar

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

nsmike wrote:
Gorilla.800.lbs wrote:
Wouldn't it be awesome if Hillary ends up sueing DNC and seeks injunction on Obama accepting the nomination? The situation begins to looks as if it would make a perfect Supreme Court material!

Jeebus you people keep coming up with the scariest ways that she just won't back down from this... First running as independent... Now this... *shudder* + *jibbilies*

Uh oh, we gave NSMike the Shubblies. The bad kind, not, y'know, Shodan's cyberboobs.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Spondee Camper
Donator V2.0
wordsmythe's picture
Location: I turn once more to those who/ sneer at this my city, and I give them back the sneer...

Alien Love Gardener wrote:
Quintin_Stone wrote:
So it's a vast what-wing conspiracy?

I think it's the infamous reality-wing. Those goddamn reality-based people ruin everything.

Think she'll seek the nomination of the Silly Party?

Elysium: The democratization of the web ... has installed an illusion of a digital first amendment that protects speech no matter how poorly spelled or stupid.
XBL: E Munnie
elementsofmeaning.blogspot.com

Not Without Incident
Donator V3.0
Quintin_Stone's picture
Location: Cary, NC

In the slab of concrete.

Fedaykin98 wrote:

Good lord, I wouldn't have expected brilliance like that from that nemeslut Quintin Stone!

wordsmythe wrote:
I know I'm not terribly cool

Office Linebacker
Donator
4dSwissCheese's picture
Location: Toronto, ON

Or you could be misconstruing the statement. If you bother to actually read or watch what he said, he said that Hillary wins the general and Barrack doesn't, and that the Obama campaign is trying to under-publicize that. While it's debatable whether or not this is true, it's significantly less paranoid and deranged than you make it out to be.

Wiener Bombardier
Donator V4.0
Podunk's picture
Location: The People's Republic of Goodge

4dSwissCheese wrote:
While it's debatable whether or not this is true, it's not insane and paranoid like you make it out to be.

There's really not much of a debate. Hillary only wins the general under a particular set of rules invented by the Clintons. It's not insane and paranoid, but it is definitely slimy and disingenuous.

Xbox Live: CrankyBaby

baggachipz: Who cares about Japan, let them have their silly pointless dog games and countless re-hashes of anime-based dragon princess super lucky crapitty crap.

Office Linebacker
Donator
4dSwissCheese's picture
Location: Toronto, ON

Podunk wrote:
Hillary only wins the general under a particular set of rules invented by the Clintons. It's not insane and paranoid, but it is definitely slimy and disingenuous.

Ummm...no. Have a look at at the most recent polling data. Clinton and Obama do about evenly in national polls, and if you go to the state by state breakdowns, she is more likely to win significant swing states such as Ohio and Florida.

Granted, she only gets to run in the general under a particular set of rules invented by the Clintons. But that's not what was being talked about.

Wiener Bombardier
Donator V4.0
Podunk's picture
Location: The People's Republic of Goodge

4dSwissCheese wrote:
Ummm...no. Have a look at at the most recent polling data. Clinton and Obama do about evenly in national polls, and if you go to the state by state breakdowns, she is more likely to win significant swing states such as Ohio and Florida.

Granted, she only get to run in the general under a particular set of rules invented by the Clintons. But that's not what was be talked about.

Ah, I guess I thought he was talking about the Clintons' bullsh*t contention that Hillary will be ahead in the popular vote at the end of the Democratic primaries, which he addressed in the same talk:

Bill wrote:
If you vote for her and she does well in Montana and she does well in Puerto Rico, when this is over she will be ahead in the popular vote."

If he's talking about national polling, it's even sillier, if a bit less dishonest. Polling in May has little or nothing to do with the general election in November. And despite what Bill might claim, there's no way Hillary honestly wins the popular vote in the primaries. So, ummm...yeah. It's slimy and disingenuous.

Xbox Live: CrankyBaby

baggachipz: Who cares about Japan, let them have their silly pointless dog games and countless re-hashes of anime-based dragon princess super lucky crapitty crap.

Indecisive
Donator V4.0
Funkenpants's picture

4dSwissCheese wrote:
Or you could be misconstruing the statement. If you bother to actually read or watch what he said, he said that Hillary wins the general and Barrack doesn't, and that the Obama campaign is trying to under-publicize that.

" 'Oh, this is so terrible: The people they want her. Oh, this is so terrible: She is winning the general election, and he is not. Oh my goodness, we have to cover this up.' "

So where's is evidence of Obama's campaign trying to cover it up? What exactly does a "cover up" of a national poll released by a major magazine look like? Isn't "cover up" the kind of term meant to evoke a negative response from a democratic audience?

Office Linebacker
Donator
4dSwissCheese's picture
Location: Toronto, ON

Ok. I think I see the misunderstanding. Bill Clinton says two things. About the general he says that she wins and he doesn't, which is neither slimy nor particularly disingenuous and which I'm objecting to being construed as such. I assumed that this is what the thread was about, since that's what the cover-up part was about.

He also makes the

Bill wrote:
If you vote for her and she does well in Montana and she does well in Puerto Rico, when this is over she will be ahead in the popular vote."

statement, which could technically be true, if you follow Clinton math and count Florida (somewhat reasonable) and Michigan (completely unreasonable) and don't bother to try to estimate the caucus versus primary difference. I'll agree that this is disingenuous and while I wouldn't characterize it as slimy, won't be overly concerned if you do.

Wiener Bombardier
Donator V4.0
Podunk's picture
Location: The People's Republic of Goodge

4dSwissCheese wrote:
I'll agree that this is disingenuous and while I wouldn't characterize it as slimy, won't be overly concerned if you do.

Well, okay, fair enough.

Xbox Live: CrankyBaby

baggachipz: Who cares about Japan, let them have their silly pointless dog games and countless re-hashes of anime-based dragon princess super lucky crapitty crap.

uncapitalized
Donator
ranalin's picture
Location: Knoxville, TN

Now they're talking about possibly using Michigan and Florida.

Gamer Tag: Rantyr

Got Blood?
Donator V4.0
Nosferatu's picture

What's the payout on a $10 bet that she'll use Kennedy's brain tumor as "proof" that only mental damaged people go for Obama?

"Also, I have four legs and am covered in wool. Baa!" *Legion* reveals his inner furry.

Optimus Primate
Gorilla.800.lbs's picture
Location: New York, NY

The only possible deal that can happen would be one that satisfies NOONE -- neither voters in Florida & Michigan, nor their DNC delegations, nor the rest of the states that abided by the schedule, nor Obama campaign, nor, of course, Hillary, because it will STILL fall short of giving her an advantage.

Xbox Live tag Gorilla800lbs

Rifle Lovin Whore
Donator
Mayfield's picture
Location: Running around in circles trying to get a nut

There has been talk of a 60-40 or something close to that compromise, but I don't think the Clinton camp will go along with anything but a total victory in Michigan. If the Democratic party does this then forget anyone listening to them about anything for now on.

Playing WoW as: Vilius (70 NE Druid)

“The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.” John K Galbraith

Executive
Donator
OG_slinger's picture

Mayfield wrote:
There has been talk of a 60-40 or something close to that compromise, but I don't think the Clinton camp will go along with anything but a total victory in Michigan. If the Democratic party does this then forget anyone listening to them about anything for now on.

It's pretty easy for Clinton to get a total victory in Michigan since Obama wasn't even listed on the ballot. Certainly makes Hillary's "Count Every Vote" slogan ring a bit hollow when Obama supports weren't even given the option to vote for him.

The only way this could have worked is if both states voted again and attempts to do so failed.

Michigan voters need to turn their anger to the state for moving their primary up in some crazy attempt to become more, I don't know, like Iowa. Florida voters, well, I completely gave up on you two elections ago.

Optimus Primate
Gorilla.800.lbs's picture
Location: New York, NY

Quote:
The only way this could have worked is if both states voted again and attempts to do so failed.

Failed within the states themselves. Serves them right, I say, to discard the results of their unsanctioned voting.

Xbox Live tag Gorilla800lbs

It's Dead To Me
Donator V5.0
buzzvang's picture
Location: Korean Animation Studio!

Quote:
It's pretty easy for Clinton to get a total victory in Michigan since Obama wasn't even listed on the ballot. Certainly makes Hillary's "Count Every Vote" slogan ring a bit hollow when Obama supports weren't even given the option to vote for him.

I believe around 40% of Michigan voters voted "Uncommitted" in the primary to signify either their support for Obama, Edwards, Richardson, or Biden, who were all not on the ballot. Or they could have been voicing their lack of support for anyone on the slate. Not exactly a slam dunk win for the Popular Vote when half of the primary candidates aren't even on the ballot.

Psychotic Foreign Teenage Chicks are so hot. - Legion
I find it ironic anytime a healthy vaccinated person bitches about science...on the internet. - MaverickDago

Office Linebacker
Donator
nossid's picture
Location: Sweden

Computers don't make errors. What they do, they do on purpose. By now your name and particulars have been fed into every laptop, desktop, mainframe and supermarket scanner that collectively make up the global information conspiracy.
-- Dale Gribble