British students arrested for researching Al-Qaeda
Tuesday, May 27th, 2008 - 7:55am
Two British students were arrested and held for six days for researching Al-Qaeda. One of the students, Hicham Yezza, was arrested because he printed a document for the other student, Rizwaan Sabir. Yezza is now facing deportation without a hearing to Algeria. The irony? The document was downloaded from a U.S. Government site.
Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.



Honeypot?
Politely rude. Briskly vague. Firmly uninformative.
Heh, no, a public DoJ site:
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/terrorism/alqaida_manual/
Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.
Oh. For a second I thought maybe we tried something clever or that maybe we were helping cover AQ web-hosting fees by mirroring some of their publications. I saw this mentioned on CNN but they didn't have anywhere near the detail your linked report has. Sad really, a co-worker rats out the foreign staffer because of a file on their computer... and everybody freaks out like terrified children. I hope killing more foreigners will help end this crippling fear we all have.
BTW I am SOOOO not clicking on that link!
Politely rude. Briskly vague. Firmly uninformative.
It is only patriotic to have a blind, seething hatred of your enemy. Any attempt to understand your enemy will be interpreted as providing aid and comfort.
NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.
BF2142 Stats
I'm not sure what's worse: that I've heard people express that very view or that, in this political climate, I'm not at all surprised to hear it... Thanks Lobster, now you've got me depressed.
The measure of a man is how truly his actions reflect his own truth - not how well his actions fall into line with what makes others comfortable.
My work here is done.
NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.
BF2142 Stats
Its a little more worrisome when the people "researching" have ties to Algiers.
Britain has a totally different set of rules regarding terrorism, they have a much better trust of their government and allow a lot more clandestine stuff, and in turn, their government doesn't get caught doing stupid stuff, Guantamo Bay torture, Abu Gahrib
You're going to have to come up with a better argument than "these people are ethnic Arabs" in order to make headway in this forum.
Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.
Be nice to the coffee grinder. *peers at Maverick's avatar* ...Just to be safe.
I do agree that it's a bit of a stretch to say that Middle Eastern-looking people have less of a right to research some things than whites.
NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.
BF2142 Stats
In this country (US), they have the right to look at whatever they want, hell they could look at bomb plans and its fine. In the UK, its different, Catholic Irish were arrested for looking at IRA information in the 80's and 90's. Protestants looking at UVF stuff were arrested. Historically Britain has been more of a target from ethnic terrorism then the States and their laws have adapted accordingly. Is it right? I don't know, but I live with it. The State Secrets Act and Terrorism Act give UK intelligence agencies much more leeway to investigate, arrest and not tell the public the total story.
Hmm. Point taken, Maverick. I guess even an America-hating liberal like me can occasionally be overly America-centric.
NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.
BF2142 Stats
Its amazing how after living outside the US, I can come back and still be amazed at what were allowed to do here, even in our darkest, most censored hour, we can say and read what so many people can't, its pretty cool.
That's what I keep telling myself whenever a new freedom gets taken away. I can type just about anything I want on this board and I know people won't show up to haul me off to prison.
NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.
BF2142 Stats
...yet.
Why do you live with it? The UK citizens gave them that power, and this is what they do with it. I'd think it was about time to reconsider that grant.
Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.
Yes. Yet. As soon as I'm no longer confident in that, I'm moving to another country to watch the fireworks from a safe distance, because that would be the proverbial "writing on the wall."
NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.
BF2142 Stats
Thats not really for US cits to chime in on. The UK has a much better track record of taking action thats necessary, and frankly, their more tired of attacks over there then we are. Were pretty complacent in the US, we've have one major attack. They've been dealing with terrorism and terror attacks for over 30 years now, and the people recognize steps need to be taken to deal with it.
I would hardly call arresting students who accessed a DoJ site a good way to crack down on terrorism. If anything, it's a kind of terrorism itself.
For an explanation on the "most likely" bit, go to http://www.futureofthebook.com/stories/storyReader$605. I tried linking it, but the $ in the url won't work with the BBCode tags.
Duoae wrote:
Stengah's Steam ID
ICO: Stengah
You guys are having this horrifically tough time realizing the US is NOT the UK. US freedoms are NOT UK freedoms, their is no bill of rights there. Its both culturally and legally very different.
Maybe there should be.
Duoae wrote:
Stengah's Steam ID
ICO: Stengah
I forgot it was our place to install governments we find acceptable in other sovereign nations..
No Bill of Rights in the UK? Um, guys.... That's where we got ours from. It's one of the four or so basic documents of the Parliamentary system. Wikipedia says it dates to 1689.
Anything in there sound familiar? Note that the Magna Carta already granted habeas corpus and the right to trial by jury. So that precedes the above.
I was referring to our actual Bill of Rights, the UK's doesn't apply in this situation. Their freedom of speech is a whole different beast then in the US.
No, the UK bill of rights did apply. They were held for only six days and released after charges were not placed. Someone made a mistake and the system still worked. Uncomfortable, bad for the UK security services image, but I don't see how rights were violated.
The fact that one student was arrested afterwards on unrelated immigration charges is unfortunate. But if they'd found, say, drugs in the house, should they not have followed up on that?
And how does freedom of speech play into it? Just curious, not attacking here.
Our freedom of speech has been applied to academic pursuits and the ability to read/research anything without fear of repercussion. You can look up how to make a nuclear bomb in this country. In the UK, what they consider freedom of speech doesn't encompass the same stuff. They can get in trouble for looking up the wrong stuff.
Who suggested invading England? All I was saying is that UK citizens shouldn't give their government the ability to arrest people for reading documents it doesn't like.
Duoae wrote:
Stengah's Steam ID
ICO: Stengah
Article Ten of the Human Rights Act says:
As far as I can tell, they were not arrested for doing any of this. They were arrested because there was a worry that they were attempting to violate national security. When that was found not to be true, no charges were placed. Note what the link above states:
This is a document that the UK security forces already view with suspicion, but they have not arrested everyone who has viewed it (obviously) nor have they outlawed it. The obvious conclusion is that they *thought* there were other circumstances that might indicate something was being planned, and when it became obvious that was not the case, the men were released.
Mistakes are ugly, but they don't indicate that basic rights are non-existant. If that were so, they'd still be locked up - or worse yet, charged secretly and held secretly, as we do in the US on these occasions.
Yezza's deportation has been delayed.
Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.
Good. And so the system works.
I'm sorry Maverick but that isn't true. There was no arrests made for looking at information on either side. In fact the exact opposite happened. Both political wings of those organisations, Sinn Fein and the Progressive Unionist Party (PUP), were allowed to run for office and hold seats in Westminster. In one famous episode a convicted IRA member even held a seat. Information on either sides demands and attitudes was widespread and abundant. I'm certainly totally unaware of any information I could view when I was in Britain and can even remember being forced to pay into a bucket collecting money for the IRA in London Irish pub.
Even worse, the times the UK did veer away from basic rights were the very times it got itself into the worst trouble. Internment, Shoot-to-kill, false imprisonments and the hunger strikers are all episodes that only strengthened the hand of violent nationalists and only served to inflame the situation.
SteamID: Coyler
Xbox Live: Coyler