British students arrested for researching Al-Qaeda

Executive
Donator
Aetius's picture

Two British students were arrested and held for six days for researching Al-Qaeda. One of the students, Hicham Yezza, was arrested because he printed a document for the other student, Rizwaan Sabir. Yezza is now facing deportation without a hearing to Algeria. The irony? The document was downloaded from a U.S. Government site.

Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.

Hi Rez, Low Maintenance
Donator V4.0
Rezzy's picture
Location: Casino Bluffs, Iowa

Aetius wrote:
The irony? The document was downloaded from a U.S. Government site.

Honeypot?

Politely rude. Briskly vague. Firmly uninformative.

Executive
Donator
Aetius's picture

Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.

Hi Rez, Low Maintenance
Donator V4.0
Rezzy's picture
Location: Casino Bluffs, Iowa

Oh. For a second I thought maybe we tried something clever or that maybe we were helping cover AQ web-hosting fees by mirroring some of their publications. I saw this mentioned on CNN but they didn't have anywhere near the detail your linked report has. Sad really, a co-worker rats out the foreign staffer because of a file on their computer... and everybody freaks out like terrified children. I hope killing more foreigners will help end this crippling fear we all have.

BTW I am SOOOO not clicking on that link!

Politely rude. Briskly vague. Firmly uninformative.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V3.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

It is only patriotic to have a blind, seething hatred of your enemy. Any attempt to understand your enemy will be interpreted as providing aid and comfort.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

BF2142 Stats

Intern
Flip's picture

LobsterMobster wrote:
It is only patriotic to have a blind, seething hatred of your enemy. Any attempt to understand your enemy will be interpreted as providing aid and comfort.

I'm not sure what's worse: that I've heard people express that very view or that, in this political climate, I'm not at all surprised to hear it... Thanks Lobster, now you've got me depressed.

The measure of a man is how truly his actions reflect his own truth - not how well his actions fall into line with what makes others comfortable.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V3.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

Flip wrote:
LobsterMobster wrote:
It is only patriotic to have a blind, seething hatred of your enemy. Any attempt to understand your enemy will be interpreted as providing aid and comfort.

I'm not sure what's worse: that I've heard people express that very view or that, in this political climate, I'm not at all surprised to hear it... Thanks Lobster, now you've got me depressed.

My work here is done.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

BF2142 Stats

Office Linebacker
MaverickDago's picture

Quote:
It is only patriotic to have a blind, seething hatred of your enemy. Any attempt to understand your enemy will be interpreted as providing aid and comfort

Its a little more worrisome when the people "researching" have ties to Algiers.
Britain has a totally different set of rules regarding terrorism, they have a much better trust of their government and allow a lot more clandestine stuff, and in turn, their government doesn't get caught doing stupid stuff, Guantamo Bay torture, Abu Gahrib

Executive
Donator
Aetius's picture

MaverickDago wrote:
Its a little more worrisome when the people "researching" have ties to Algiers.
Britain has a totally different set of rules regarding terrorism, they have a much better trust of their government and allow a lot more clandestine stuff, and in turn, their government doesn't get caught doing stupid stuff, Guantamo Bay torture, Abu Gahrib

You're going to have to come up with a better argument than "these people are ethnic Arabs" in order to make headway in this forum.

Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V3.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

Aetius wrote:
MaverickDago wrote:
Its a little more worrisome when the people "researching" have ties to Algiers.
Britain has a totally different set of rules regarding terrorism, they have a much better trust of their government and allow a lot more clandestine stuff, and in turn, their government doesn't get caught doing stupid stuff, Guantamo Bay torture, Abu Gahrib

You're going to have to come up with a better argument than "these people are ethnic Arabs" in order to make headway in this forum.

Be nice to the coffee grinder. *peers at Maverick's avatar* ...Just to be safe.

I do agree that it's a bit of a stretch to say that Middle Eastern-looking people have less of a right to research some things than whites.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

BF2142 Stats

Office Linebacker
MaverickDago's picture

In this country (US), they have the right to look at whatever they want, hell they could look at bomb plans and its fine. In the UK, its different, Catholic Irish were arrested for looking at IRA information in the 80's and 90's. Protestants looking at UVF stuff were arrested. Historically Britain has been more of a target from ethnic terrorism then the States and their laws have adapted accordingly. Is it right? I don't know, but I live with it. The State Secrets Act and Terrorism Act give UK intelligence agencies much more leeway to investigate, arrest and not tell the public the total story.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V3.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

Hmm. Point taken, Maverick. I guess even an America-hating liberal like me can occasionally be overly America-centric.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

BF2142 Stats

Office Linebacker
MaverickDago's picture

Its amazing how after living outside the US, I can come back and still be amazed at what were allowed to do here, even in our darkest, most censored hour, we can say and read what so many people can't, its pretty cool.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V3.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

MaverickDago wrote:
Its amazing how after living outside the US, I can come back and still be amazed at what were allowed to do here, even in our darkest, most censored hour, we can say and read what so many people can't, its pretty cool.

That's what I keep telling myself whenever a new freedom gets taken away. I can type just about anything I want on this board and I know people won't show up to haul me off to prison.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

BF2142 Stats

Junior Executive
OG_slinger's picture

...yet.

Executive
Donator
Aetius's picture

MaverickDago wrote:
I don't know, but I live with it. The State Secrets Act and Terrorism Act give UK intelligence agencies much more leeway to investigate, arrest and not tell the public the total story.

Why do you live with it? The UK citizens gave them that power, and this is what they do with it. I'd think it was about time to reconsider that grant.

Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V3.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

OG_slinger wrote:
...yet.

Yes. Yet. As soon as I'm no longer confident in that, I'm moving to another country to watch the fireworks from a safe distance, because that would be the proverbial "writing on the wall."

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

BF2142 Stats

Office Linebacker
MaverickDago's picture

Quote:
The UK citizens gave them that power, and this is what they do with it. I'd think it was about time to reconsider that grant.

Thats not really for US cits to chime in on. The UK has a much better track record of taking action thats necessary, and frankly, their more tired of attacks over there then we are. Were pretty complacent in the US, we've have one major attack. They've been dealing with terrorism and terror attacks for over 30 years now, and the people recognize steps need to be taken to deal with it.

Junior Executive
Stengah's picture
Location: Augusta, ME

MaverickDago wrote:
They've been dealing with terrorism and terror attacks for over 30 years now, and the people recognize steps need to be taken to deal with it.

Benjamin Franklin (most likely) wrote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

I would hardly call arresting students who accessed a DoJ site a good way to crack down on terrorism. If anything, it's a kind of terrorism itself.

For an explanation on the "most likely" bit, go to http://www.futureofthebook.com/stories/storyReader$605. I tried linking it, but the $ in the url won't work with the BBCode tags.

Duoae wrote:

Frankly i'm sick of all this anti-nipple-establishmentarianism

Stengah's Steam ID
ICO: Stengah

Office Linebacker
MaverickDago's picture

You guys are having this horrifically tough time realizing the US is NOT the UK. US freedoms are NOT UK freedoms, their is no bill of rights there. Its both culturally and legally very different.

Junior Executive
Stengah's picture
Location: Augusta, ME

MaverickDago wrote:
US freedoms are NOT UK freedoms, there is no bill of rights there.

Maybe there should be.

Duoae wrote:

Frankly i'm sick of all this anti-nipple-establishmentarianism

Stengah's Steam ID
ICO: Stengah

Office Linebacker
MaverickDago's picture

I forgot it was our place to install governments we find acceptable in other sovereign nations..

Main Gauche
Donator V5.0
Robear's picture

No Bill of Rights in the UK? Um, guys.... That's where we got ours from. It's one of the four or so basic documents of the Parliamentary system. Wikipedia says it dates to 1689.

Quote:

Englishmen, as embodied by Parliament, possessed certain immutable civil and political rights. These included:

* freedom from royal interference with the law (the Sovereign was forbidden to establish his own courts or to act as a judge himself)
* freedom from taxation by royal prerogative, without agreement by Parliament
* freedom to petition the Monarch
* freedom from a peace-time standing army, without agreement by Parliament
* freedom [for Protestants] to have arms for their defence, suitable to their class status and as allowed by law
* freedom to elect members of Parliament without interference from the Sovereign
* the freedom of speech in Parliament, in that proceedings in Parliament were not to be questioned in the courts or in any body outside Parliament itself (the basis of modern parliamentary privilege)
* freedom from cruel and unusual punishments, and excessive bail
* freedom from fines and forfeitures without trial

Anything in there sound familiar? Note that the Magna Carta already granted habeas corpus and the right to trial by jury. So that precedes the above.

Office Linebacker
MaverickDago's picture

I was referring to our actual Bill of Rights, the UK's doesn't apply in this situation. Their freedom of speech is a whole different beast then in the US.

Main Gauche
Donator V5.0
Robear's picture

No, the UK bill of rights did apply. They were held for only six days and released after charges were not placed. Someone made a mistake and the system still worked. Uncomfortable, bad for the UK security services image, but I don't see how rights were violated.

The fact that one student was arrested afterwards on unrelated immigration charges is unfortunate. But if they'd found, say, drugs in the house, should they not have followed up on that?

And how does freedom of speech play into it? Just curious, not attacking here.

Office Linebacker
MaverickDago's picture

Our freedom of speech has been applied to academic pursuits and the ability to read/research anything without fear of repercussion. You can look up how to make a nuclear bomb in this country. In the UK, what they consider freedom of speech doesn't encompass the same stuff. They can get in trouble for looking up the wrong stuff.

Junior Executive
Stengah's picture
Location: Augusta, ME

MaverickDago wrote:
I forgot it was our place to install governments we find acceptable in other sovereign nations..

Who suggested invading England? All I was saying is that UK citizens shouldn't give their government the ability to arrest people for reading documents it doesn't like.

Duoae wrote:

Frankly i'm sick of all this anti-nipple-establishmentarianism

Stengah's Steam ID
ICO: Stengah

Main Gauche
Donator V5.0
Robear's picture

Article Ten of the Human Rights Act says:

Quote:

Article 10: Freedom of Expression

(1) Everyone has the right of freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without inference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.

(2) The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

As far as I can tell, they were not arrested for doing any of this. They were arrested because there was a worry that they were attempting to violate national security. When that was found not to be true, no charges were placed. Note what the link above states:

Quote:

The attached manual was located by the Manchester (England) Metropolitan Police during a search of an Al Qaeda member's home. The manual was found in a computer file described as "the military series" related to the "Declaration of Jihad." The manual was translated into English and was introduced earlier this year at the embassy bombing trial in New York. The Department is only providing the following selected text from the manual because it does not want to aid in educating terrorists or encourage further acts of terrorism.

This is a document that the UK security forces already view with suspicion, but they have not arrested everyone who has viewed it (obviously) nor have they outlawed it. The obvious conclusion is that they *thought* there were other circumstances that might indicate something was being planned, and when it became obvious that was not the case, the men were released.

Mistakes are ugly, but they don't indicate that basic rights are non-existant. If that were so, they'd still be locked up - or worse yet, charged secretly and held secretly, as we do in the US on these occasions.

Executive
Donator
Aetius's picture

Remember: this conversation is just between you and me ... and the NSA.

Main Gauche
Donator V5.0
Robear's picture

Good. And so the system works.

Office Linebacker
Axon's picture

MaverickDago wrote:
In this country (US), they have the right to look at whatever they want, hell they could look at bomb plans and its fine. In the UK, its different, Catholic Irish were arrested for looking at IRA information in the 80's and 90's. Protestants looking at UVF stuff were arrested.

I'm sorry Maverick but that isn't true. There was no arrests made for looking at information on either side. In fact the exact opposite happened. Both political wings of those organisations, Sinn Fein and the Progressive Unionist Party (PUP), were allowed to run for office and hold seats in Westminster. In one famous episode a convicted IRA member even held a seat. Information on either sides demands and attitudes was widespread and abundant. I'm certainly totally unaware of any information I could view when I was in Britain and can even remember being forced to pay into a bucket collecting money for the IRA in London Irish pub.

Even worse, the times the UK did veer away from basic rights were the very times it got itself into the worst trouble. Internment, Shoot-to-kill, false imprisonments and the hunger strikers are all episodes that only strengthened the hand of violent nationalists and only served to inflame the situation.

SteamID: Coyler
Xbox Live: Coyler