Since When is Nirvana "Classic Rock"?
Pardon me while I ramble.
San Diego has 6 or 7 stations that could be loosely defined as "rock." Two are more or less alternative, one adult alternative and the other the typical corporate alt-rock station every city in America is plagued with, complete with smarmy DJs who talk all over the songs. One is a hard rock station that leans heavily towards sh*tty suburban angst acts like Linkin Park or the latest mall punk du jour. One is an open format "rock without rules" station that considers John Meyer and Nickleback rock. One is quite good--a college-ish rocker that's more than willing to toss in the occasional Johnny Cash, Muddy Waters, or Led Zep to go along with The Cure, Arctic Monkeys, or The Strokes. And one is the "classic" rock station. It is that station which I was tuned into this evening when I hopped into my post-workout shower, and it is that station which provoked a minor crisis of identity.
They played Nirvana.
There I am, minding my own business, listening to Queen and David Bowie, when the unmistakable opening riff of Smells Like Teen Spirit disrupted what had, up until that point, been an agreeably routine evening.
It's not that I don't like Nirvana--although I'm not their biggest fan. I'm not the world's biggest Picasso fan either, but I readily acknowledge his importance in the history of art. And what Picasso was to painting, Nirvana was to rock: after them, everything changed. It's just that they're rum raisin, whereas I am more of a mint chocolate chip kind of guy.
My first, and most foolish, objection was that Nirvana just isn't old enough to be "classic." But I had to admit that when, not a day earlier, I'd heard them playing November Rain, I had wholeheartedly approved. So much for age...but then, the Gunners were the Last True American Rock Band--the last band that couldn't be lumped into a rock genre prefixed by "thrash" or "alternative" or "glam" or "pop." They were special. They were pure. Guns 'n' Roses bore the mantle of Rock, carried on through an unbroken line of succession starting with Chuck Berry and passed from the highs of CCR through the lows of Kiss to the middling doldrums of Aerosmith. In many ways, it was Nirvana who cut that cord.
Is that it? Is Nirvana rock's Judas? Or did they reinvigorate a style that had slid into a torpor, as stale and bloated as Jon Bon Jovi's hair? The more I wonder about it, the more it becomes clear to me that the argument has less to do with the legacy of rock or the age appropriateness of certain radio selections, and more to do with me. I think that mostly, it comes down to me simply not wanting Nirvana to be classic rock. Nevermind was released nearly seventeen years ago, but in my mind it may as well have been last summer.
I can remember my high school years, riding along with my father and listening to his classic rock station--an indisputably classic rock station, where rock sailed off the edge of the Earth in 1979--and wondering at what point exactly I would start listening to lame dinosaur music and give up on current bands like those new guys I heard the other day...the ones from Seattle.
I guess now I know.
Ken Levine wrote:
I could be at the office making BioShock, or I could be at the office making Pet the Pony 3 on the Wii or something, and I'd rather be making BioShock.


Ever since the George Lopez show is considered classic TV. *shudder*
"I'm absolutely retarded. Not 100% sure why." - atom
"Dhelor + intarwebs = Great ideas." - wordsmythe
"Do I what I do: hate everyone." - Quintin_Stone
Nirvana and Seattle grunge was no more a deviation from "true rock" (whatever that may be) than, say, Pink Floyd, ELP, and the whole prog-rock movement was, or the punk movement.
Rock is full of offshoots, reactions, and counter-reactions. Nirvana and grunge are not special in this regard, save perhaps being one of the last ones to enjoy mainstream cultural relevance. I think it's romanticizing things a bit to view a "true rock" lineage from Chuck Berry to GnR.
Gaming / PC Tech Blog: www.blastprocessing.net
Xbox Live: Legion SB / PSN: Legion_SB / Steam: legion028
Follow me! http://twitter.com/legion
I guess it depends on what you consider classic. It's all subjective. I wouldn't consider Nirvana classic rock, but like you said, they were an important group. I'll know I'm old when the local classic rock station starts playing American Idiot.
Remember when people younger than you started listening to sh*tty music, and way too loud? Yeah, that's when.
Nirvana is classic rock ever since Kurt shot himself. That's why Pearl Jam isn't, they're all still alive.
You can't take the sky from me.
Bad puns FTW!
Now that song is stuck in my head.. Thanks!
An ounce of prevention creates a single point of failure -- IT Security Proverb
Giannino - 70 Fury Warrior
Ack! Frelling Windows 98!
An ounce of prevention creates a single point of failure -- IT Security Proverb
Giannino - 70 Fury Warrior
Since people with an IQ of under 80 were allowed to express their opinion.
"sous les paves, la plage !!"
Eve-Online : Elizabeth Lockley
That made me cry a little on the inside.
Unfettered Blather - Daily updated nonsense
X-Box Live Gamertag - CrazedJava
Less chatter more splatter!
Since we got old.
dejanzie- "Let's say Stephen Hawking is after your new pc, and your porn is backed up- would you find it wrong to shoot him?"
LiquidMantis- "Hell no. I'd push over his wheelchair then teabag him while shouting, 'Here's your universe in a nutshell!'"
Pearl Jam is Girl Jam that is why it will never be "classic" rock.... but come on people! Time marches forward! How old does a song have to be inorder for it to be "Classic"... well according to the radio stations, my definition is 60 to about mid to late 70's.
Xfire: Pharacon
Tempest says: "A team hat doe snot communicate and talk to each other about what the next move will be is going to lose."
Mex is my hero = "f*ck it, I'll do it. WE'LL DO IT LIVE."
Nirvana is totally classic rock. Nevermind came out about 16 years ago. Think back to your adolesence - would you consider 16 year old music to be classic rock? For me I'll think of listening to R.E.M. circa 1990. I would have easily considered Pink Floyd classic rock at the time.
Xbox Live: hubbinsd
I think it also depends how do you define the term 'classic rock,' whether it is 'classic' by time elapsed or if you define 'Classic Rock' as a style.
Aerosmith is generally classified as 'classic rock,' but what about their more recent album? say, 'Pump' and on. What about the Black Crowes, who I think make decent 'classic rock' albums. God forbid, what about the Rolling Stones?
Personally, I think of 'Classic Rock' is a style, so Nirvana will probably never be 'Classic Rock' in my mind, even 50 years from now. Same with Guns n Roses.
Xbox Live: NOVOCAIN1217
Classic Rock is not a style. It is merely a representation of what was playing on rock stations during the target demographic's high school years. We cling to this music, either consciously or subconsciously. You've just reached the the beginning years of most classic rock stations target demographic. If you want to be truly horrified, check out what they consider "Oldies" now.
Nirvana really did blow everything up. Think about it. You never hear The Velvet Underground, Patti Smith, or Television on Classic Rock stations. But then, they never got play on AOR. But Nirvana crossed over, and was bigger than big, obviously.
I saw Nirvana for the first time in '89 at the Outhouse in Lawrence, Kansas. Honestly, I was there to see 24-7 Spyz, who Nirvana opened for. When Nevermind hit, I turned my nose up at first. I loved Blew, but saw Nevermind as just another indie band going to a major label. Of course, one of my best friends insisted I listen to it anyway. Right then we knew the rules had changed.
I saw Nirvana for the seond and last time at the Kansas Ballroom in '91, just after Nevermind came out. Even then, I was more interested in seeing their opening act, Urge Overkill. But again, it was clear that Nirvana was a beast.
Right there, that was the end of seeing the best bands in America for $5-$15 at local bars and hole in the walls. Nirvana ruined live music in many ways. It wasn't long after them that "indie" bands started showing up at bigger and more expensive venues.
The Outhouse was a shack in the middle of a cornfield. Well, it was a converted tractor garage with power lines strung to it. The only other stuff added was a stage, two makeshift bathrooms, and graffiti. My guess is that it cost me $5-$8 bucks to see Nirvana the first time, and I got to bring in my own booze. There was no security, concessions, not even a ticket stub or band on your wrist. It was complete mayhem, that would never be tolerated today.
That night it was wall to wall. I never really moshed, but would just enough to make my way to the front of the stage. This night it got so crazy, that I was soon flattened face first on to the stage, with my feet still on the floor. So I climbed up and sat on the stage. Pretty soon, we were two deep. I moved over to the side was was in real danger of getting clobbered by the bass player for 24-7 Spyz. The singer was calling for the audience to grab people standing on chairs around the edges of the place and throw them in the pit. It was easily the closest I ever came to pure chaos. It was scary there for a while.
To contrast, I saw the Rolling Stones the night before. At Arrowhead Stadium. I watched them with binoculars. One night later I'm on the stage. Little did I know that the opening band would one day be playing venues as big as the Stones. Kind of pathetic, really.
Xbox Live: JayhawkerGWJ
last.fm: JayhawkerGWJ
Probably about the same time my favorite "new rock alternative" station turned into "Dance club hits of the new millennium".
Coincidentally, I started listening to a lot more NPR about that time.
Grenn wrote:
Bingo!
Xbox Live: JayhawkerGWJ
last.fm: JayhawkerGWJ
My mp3 player died a couple weeks back. Now I have to listen to the radio again.
Fedaykin98 wrote:
wordsmythe wrote:
It's not romanticizing, it's genre. In it's essential form, American Rock 'n' Roll is a musical discipline (anti-discipline would be more apt) that began as revved up blues and descended through the geneology I sketched above. That form of music "died" with G'n'R. It's no coincidence that the Use Your Illusions, the last hurrah of the 3 Chords and a face-melting solo style of hard rock, were released the same year as Nevermind. No such albums ever enjoyed that type of wide popularity again. This may hold little personal significance given your own musical preferences, but you are understating its significance in rock history to the point of absurdity.
Lower your shields, captain. I'm not attacking proggy/indie acts or even weighing in on the relative worth of various rock styles. I'm just a guy who feels pretty f*cking old because he heard Nirvana one day in his shower.
Rock the f*ck on, bro. Seriously, great post. Worthy of its own thread.
Ken Levine wrote:
I saw Soundgarden and Pearl Jam at a hollowed out Krogers in Houston for $15 back in 1993. Right before the Lollapalooza tour that had them both on the bill. That was a show.
I think when the listening audience moves into their 30's and 40's, classic rock migrates to what they were listening to in late High School. Hence, Nirvana on classic rock.
Of course, Houston's "new rock alternative" will lead with that radio fill and then play a song that's 15 years old, so apparently Nirvana is both.
Einstein was right.
Xbox Live | Steam | Last.fm
Since "Fresh Prince of Belair" started running on Nick at Nite.
Letters to the Internet
From an age standpoint, Nirvana is pretty old. As stated above, Nevermind came out in 1991 and Bleach came out in 1989. That's almost 20 years ago.
If if makes you feel any better, I am sure my dad had the same thought when they started playing Led Zeppelin on the classic rock station.
"That's because you were 10. Everyone likes Garfield when they're 10. When you're 10 you think a cat eating lasagna is genius." - Mumford
BF2 Stats
2005 GWJFFL League Champion
I heard Tears for Fears on the oldies station the other day. I'd like to think that oldies are songs that came out before I was alive.
I was two when "Everybody Wants to Rule the World" came out. That's too soon for oldies.
Letters to the Internet
You're living out Bowling For Soup's song "1985".
"... When did Motley Crue become classic rock? ..."
Why don't you just come over and kick me in the nuts? Probably feel about the same as reading that post.
I wonder if they've started to play stuff like "Thriller" on the stations that used to be "music from before my mother was born".
Grenn wrote:
Yeah, I knew how old I had gotten as I listened to that song on Disney Radio while driving my daughter around years ago.
Of course, you didn't include these lines...
Xbox Live: JayhawkerGWJ
last.fm: JayhawkerGWJ
Woah, Guns and Roses are classic rock now?
Ah hell...
WoW Blackhand Alliance
70s: Nukanatrix (M), Braun (P), Boreali (War), Heckfire (Lock), Jergen (Pal), Erissar (D)
Grumbar - 65 Hunter
This is demonstrably wrong, both in terms of the genealogy and the "death" of the genre. Guns N' Roses started life as an Aerosmith knock-off straight out of the 80's LA glam scene, and to call the overblown corporate art-rock pretensions of Use Your Illusion the last hurrah of American Rock & Roll is...well, let's just say that I cordially disagree with your assessment.
Xbox Live: CrankyBaby
baggachipz: Who cares about Japan, let them have their silly pointless dog games and countless re-hashes of anime-based dragon princess super lucky crapitty crap.
The Gunners a glam-based Aerosmith knock-off? I'm trying to remember the video where Axl and Slash doffed their top hats, bandanas, and assorted biker trappings for purple eye shadow and silvery metallic pants and, I gotta tell you, I'm having about as hard a time as I am trying to recall anything from Aerosmith's repertoire that's anywhere near as dangerous as, say, "Mr. Brownstone" or "Welcome to the Jungle."
Besides that, I never made the assertion you seem to be arguing against--that the Use Your Illusions were the highwater mark of American Rock, or even of the Gunners' career. I simply said that they represented the last time that style of music seriously encroached on the popular consciousness. One could make an argument that the something-old-is-new-again sounds of Jet, Wolfmother, or The White Stripes are a ressurgence of this style, although none of those outfits have achieved even a modicum of the popularity GN'R enjoyed at the height of their powers, and nor have any similar bands.
Still, although they had their soft spots, neither of the Illusions were as bad as you remember. "You Could Be Mine" was about as overblown and corporate as a can of gasoline and a book of matches--even with the movie tie-in--and for all its over-produced sap, "November Rain" features Slash at both his most brilliantly melodic, and icily dissonant. It's easily some of the most memorable guitar work in the last 25 years.
Ken Levine wrote:
Welcome to the Jungle came on the radio the other day while I was having a "Safety Meeting" (...nobody moves, nobody gets hurt...) in the shop the other day.
I looked over at the new guy and asked him when he was born... let's just say the song came first.
It is now my obligation to call him "Junior" for the entire time he works here.
Xbox Live : Aries GWJ PSN : AriesGWJ Spore : Ariesgwj