How tough are you really?
Saturday, December 22nd, 2007 - 2:55pm
Some of you may think we are tough guys. Workout. Martial arts training. Military background. You name it.
But what is the true measuring stick to one's physical prowess? Would you do what it takes to win a fight? At any cost?
This link may show you just how tough you are when you face endless swarming opponents who are all hyped up on Dora the Explorer.
http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com/
It is short and a good laugh. I could take 25 five year olds. I believe my moral choices held me back.
Xbox Live: Kolbo21 /// PSN: KolboGWJ
Steam Community: Kolbo
WoW Blackhand Alliance: Klobben
You could take on 28 five year old kids in a fight.
I guess I need to be taller or have more xp in martial arts?
The man wears a bucket of KFC on his head. I wouldn't expect anything less. - Pred
28 for me.
I'm not much on the physical side, but Zerg-fighting experience and a complete lack of morality where self-defense is concerned apparently count for a fair amount.
Aww, I could only take on 22 kids. It's because I'm so short, isn't it?
The darkness comes and the darkness goes
Last.fm
I could take on 26 five year old kids in a fight.
XBox Live|Tshirts|xfire | Last.fm
It thinks I could take on 30, but I really think I need to test this one in a laboratory environment.
I'm like a flashing lightning and a rolling thunder, I'm like a stepping razor
Ditto. It says I can take 28 as well. Moral flexibility does count for quite a bit. Like my old karate instructor always said, "there are only two things you should never do in a fight: kick a man below his feet or a woman in the nuts." Crude, but it makes a point.
"History is'a made at night! Character is what you are in the dark!" - Lord John Whorfin
This would make an awesome reality show.
Xbox Live Gamercard - bennard
Beer For Ben
I can take on 33 five-year olds. I'm pretty sure if you can find a corner and stack the bodies, I might in reality get to 33. Is this something like 33 fifth level guys taking on a 29th level guy?
Well, Cooking Mama didn't help me become a better cook, and Trauma Center certainly didn't help me become a better surgeon. I have the proof of both sitting in my freezer. -- imbiginjapan
31 here... I believe this site was born out of an SA thread.
Only 27 here.
Anyone click on the Death report one? It was a bit interesting to find out that Bill Hicks died on my birthday.
IronClad Online: PurEvil
only 19. to be fair, I am not very tough at all.
"I can't knife you right now. I have a chair and some pants."
30 for me, which I insist is lowballing. I'm certain that I could take a running start at the group and trample 15 or so of them right off the bat.
WII FRIEND CODE: 6936 4764 8384 6058
Gaming / PC Tech Blog: www.blastprocessing.net
Xbox Live: Legion SB / PSN: Legion_SB / Steam: legion028 / Twitter: legion
It says I could take 26 of them. The weird thing is it also said I could take 48 Mex's. Not sure what that's all about.
Certis beat me to it. - Elysium
My days of not taking you seriously have certainly come to a middle.
Steam Profile
My Gamercard
It's called a gangbang, baby
The man wears a bucket of KFC on his head. I wouldn't expect anything less. - Pred
26 here too.
Now with Xbox Live: Redhwk GWJ
I still maintain that women should get an automatic score bonus in this - think about it. We have a lower center of gravity, we don't have an obvious weak point right at head-butt level and we have that whole mother figure thing, where the kids might be a little less anxious to attack us.
I could take 24, btw.
My tabletop RPG blog
It says I can take 31.
Now to test this.
Xbox Live | Last.fm | Blog | Facebook | Twitter
Naw, you have that "mother instinct" thing that makes you go "awwww, look at the cute kids coming right at me to murder me! They're so cute in their uniforms! Who's a little kiddie widdie?".
I'm saddened to find that I'd probably die in a Zombie infestation
You Have a 35% Chance of Survival!
http://www.justsayhi.com/bb/zombie
I think it was my refusal to kill loved ones and the lack of experience with guns.
The man wears a bucket of KFC on his head. I wouldn't expect anything less. - Pred
I just noticed on the site also is a zombie apocalypse survival test. That my friends, is the true question. Prepare now, because it's not a question of "if" but of "when".
My results indicate a 71 percent chance of survival.
"History is'a made at night! Character is what you are in the dark!" - Lord John Whorfin
You could take on 23 five year old kids in a fight.
XBL / Art / Blog (09/20) / Buy! (10/07)
I would punt those little buggers like I was playing in the Superbowl.
A horde of little kids attacks, you gotta figure that they are possessed or brainwashed or something, and it's either you or them.
I grant that if one's own child was part of the mob, that might cripple one emotionally.
My tabletop RPG blog
Result shows be beating the bejeezus out of 32 5 year olds.
Hit first!
Hit hard!
Show no mercy!
Now bring on the 6 year olds.
Only 60% on the zombies. I'm a softie when it comes to saving the innocents.
"Excuses are like poems: they're for sissies and no one wants to hear 'em" - Ron Stilanovich
XBL - Trophy Husband1
I maintain that whoever lets this be a finite number has already lost. The whole point is to get an environmental advantage which allows you to dispose of them indefinitely. Something like an open elevator shaft next to a staircase... as they turn the corner you kick them in the shaft.
Eh, that came out wrong.
I rated 30.
Fedaykin98 wrote:
wordsmythe wrote:
Thirty-three. I maintain that there should have been more dirty trick options. I mean they only discussed using live children as weapons and shields. With a simple twist, the arm of a dead child can be a very effective cudgel.
"Everyone's always in favor of saving Hitler's brain but when you put it in the body of a great white shark, ooh, suddenly you've gone too far"- Hubert Farnsworth-Futurama
36, seems I'm a lot more callous than my Sig would suggest
Never violate a woman, nor harm a child.
Do not lie, cheat or steal.
These things are for lesser men.
Protect the weak against the evil strong.
And never allow thoughts of gain to lead you into the pursuit of evil.
I could take 33, not bad.
Quintin_Stone wrote:
lunabean wrote:23 here too.
I thought my height and reach would be more devastating for the children. (Kids see me as a giant human jungle gym after all)
Being fangoriously devoured by a gelatinous monster.
I could take 35 5-year-olds and have a 56% chance of surviving a zombie apocalypse.
GWJ Alliance on Blackhand
Lunazul - Rouge & GWJ Paparazzo
Lunarel - Druid
Funkenpants wrote: