I Suck At Chess... Best Way To Improve Myself?
I don't know why, but every few years I get the itch to try and play chess. Ever since I first played in 3rd grade, I've sucked-- I still remember losing my first game in that 3rd grade class to a girl that I considered my mental inferior (the shame haunts me to this day
).
I guess my question is this-- whats the best way for someone who knows the rules but noting else to LEARN how to play the game? I've been looking through some books online, but not sure where to start. Do any of the chess PC programs offer indepth tutorials to new players?
Maybe i'm just wasting my time... maybe I'll just never get the hang of the game. I just know that I always feel like I WANT to.
Any suggestions?
xbox LIVE: NatsuMatto
That's What She Said -- A Podcast About NBC's THE OFFICE
Follow me on Twitter: SommerMatt


I'm sorry if it's not too viable a solution, but I think the best way to learn to play well is to find someone who is better then you, and play with them. Someone patient is ideal, because you'll want to ask why they did certain things to unravel the depth of strategy involved.
well... that narrows it down to every human on earth
Thanks 
xbox LIVE: NatsuMatto
That's What She Said -- A Podcast About NBC's THE OFFICE
Follow me on Twitter: SommerMatt
I wouldn't mind trying a few games of chess if you've found a decent freebie version of some kind. I can't promise I'm any better than you though.
Most of the commercial chess games have tutorial modes, but probably going to redhotpawn.com is the best way to learn how to beat real people through playing. You can get to the point where you can beat 99% of the general population just by playing games. Actually studying the game, in my opinion, is too much like work.
"All that time you waste dating and having sex could be better spent scouring the web for new game developer press releases." - Quintin_Stone
Chessmaster 9000 had really GOOD tutorials. I was very impressed with it. I don't know if they've done any more since, but you could probably buy that one for almost nothing and be very happy.
They have a lot of audio commentary from one of the grand masters, and then they have a whole slew of simulated opponents at different skill levels and with different strengths. It really doesn't feel much like you're playing a computer.
Personally, I'd suggest the tutorials before going to get your ass handed to you online.
A quick google search for chess tutorials turned up this:
http://chess.about.com/od/improveyouropenings/ss/ble50ndx.htm
Generally a chess game is broken up into 3 states:
opening - where the players usually follow a preconceived/typical pattern to get their forces into strategic positions to play an offensive and/or defensive game.
midgame - taking pieces and realigning strategy until your opponents side has been effectively crippled allowing you to go to the -
endgame - getting pieces into position to force the opponent into checkmate.
The key is to have a great opening set. Everything else pretty much falls from that.
Stop pawn rushing!
Cyrana Mage 80 ~ Artesia Druid 72
Cyranna Shaman 62 ~ Acereri - DK 61 ~ Artasian - Priest 59 ~ Lenna - Rogue 60
kekekeke! ^_^
Fedaykin98 wrote:
wordsmythe wrote:
Exactly. Also, go into the game with the agreement that either side can take back any move at any time. It stops the game from being about stupid mistakes, and lets you focus on strategies.
I would recommend picking up a few books and a version of Chessmaster to practice with. The Silman book below gives a very simple to understand breakdown of all the chess principles and it's a very easy and fun read.
"Reassess Your Chess" - Jeremy Silman
"Reassess Your Chess Workbook" - Jeremy Silman
Lag used to be a lot worse back in the day. Hell, it took Jesus 3 days to respawn.
Quintin_Stone wrote: The typical American eats 3.5 bigfoots in their sleep each year.
PSN: x93_confirmedx (message me for Socom!)
thanks for the suggestions so far.
My problem is that I know absolutely NOTHING about strategy. Nothing. I know how the pieces work, and when I play, I just start moving pieces at random and just react to what the other person does. I don't know anything about openings, midgames, OR endgames
As I said, I suck.
I might look into getting Chessmaster 10th (or 9000? which version is better?) and see if it can tutor me.
xbox LIVE: NatsuMatto
That's What She Said -- A Podcast About NBC's THE OFFICE
Follow me on Twitter: SommerMatt
I reckon that the best solution is to join a club. In my experience most of the members will be old(er) and as such will be happy to accommodate 'new blood'.
I went with a friend when i was in school. Enjoyed my time there. He was really good and challenged even the best in their pool of players whereas i was the worst person they had there...
For some reason though, i am unbeaten at speed chess - even against my friend... I guess it's the FPS of the chess world
A blog: by me!
EGGmen - A European gaming blog *Episode 3 now live*
The Silman book recommendations above are excellent. He is my favorite Chess writer. I would not start with those books though as you really need to understand the basics first and those books are geared towards intermediate players. If you want to pick up some books, start with Yasser Seirawan's Winning Chess series. They will start you off with the right info and they are very well written.
If you like software, the Chess Mentor series is great, with some good writers/players having contributed. (Silman wrote quite a few of the lessons). Chess computers like Chessmaster can be helpful, but I'd also play games against other people. Redhotpawn (mentioned above) is a great service and the games are correspondence-like, so you can take as long as you want to think about your moves.
After you get the basics down, the single best way to learn chess is to play over master games. Find a player you like, maybe one of the world champions - Kasparov, Fischer, Alekhine, Capablanca - and get a book of his games. Play through them at a board and try to understand what your hero is doing (you won't understand everything, but you will pick up more over time the longer you review them. A great book to help you get started on this technique and see the value in playing over master games is Chernev's Logical Chess Move-by-Move. It is a classic. Good luck!
XBL: jakelegg | PSN: jakeleg-GWJ
Server info
Get your opponent drunk.
"Men like sex, thus boobies! Oogaba!" - dejanzie
"If ads put your sanity to the test
come on down to Rat Boy's nest!
light up a stogie, and soon you'll see
how rock can be commercial-free!
'I'd hit it!'" - HP Lovesauce
I have 10th edition and recommend it wholeheartedly. The tutorials are quite deep and you can tweak around the AI to get the feel for different personalities at chess - from very stupid and erratic to very advanced. The last Chessmaster I played was 7000 and 10th edition has really much more to teach. Plus I love the ability to watch historical games and learn from them. Moreover, it can be found cheaply.
It's not Wandering Toast. Except in TF2, where it usually is.
You are at the coolest point of learning chess. You've gotten the basics out of the way and can focus on the fun stuff.
The best way to start is a book which combines exercises in the 3 sections of the game (opening, mid, end), plus some chess "puzzles" & lots of complete games played by masters. Chess puzzles are wonderful because the last 3rd of any game is always a puzzle of some kind.
I've learned the most about strategy by studying games played by grand masters. In chess notation, a ! indicates a particularly awesome move. I'd play through games between grand masters and focus on those moves, analyzing them until I understood why they were so brilliant.
If you switch up your study between these areas, eventually it will all come together for you. A friend and I played as a team against a particularly good chess program every day until we beat it. The way we talked out our moves sped my learning quite a bit.
We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all.
"What misconception traveled down the road and made you want to be here?"
As a casual chess player, I can't endorse the Chessmaster series enough. I've owned a couple versions in the past (GBA/6000), but it wasn't until I got my hands on the latest, Chessmaster 10th Ed., that I got a grasp of just how rich the tutorial content is in the series.
There's a section labeled Chessmaster Academy that features dozens and dozens of interactive lessons (likely over a hundred). Everything is covered from the basic rules of gameplay all the way up to advanced theories of Grandmaster strategy. It's conveniently segmented into Chapters that are well organized and take you on a nice learning curve that builds on previous lessons. It's also a nice touch that that finished lessons are check-marked so you never forget where you left off.
As for the content itself, each lesson combines voiced commentary from Josh Waitzkin (Searching For Bobby Fischer) accompanied by animated chess boards that give a visual aid to what is being taught, followed by exercises to reinforce the lesson. Finally, there's an End Chapter quiz (series of "pick the best move/moves"). The voice-overs sync with the animated chess sets and additionally, Josh give personal anecdotes about how what your learning impacted him in his career as a chess champion. It really humanizes the process and keeps it all from feeling too sterile & clinical.
I'm simply floored by the amount of audio commentary in these lessons. It's pretty amazing when you consider that it's basically like having a virtual chess coach giving you dozens of hours of lessons in a very user-friendly environment at the low cost of $20.
Sorry to come off as all hyperbole about the product, but much like the OP, I always had an interest and respect for chess but pretty much sucked and was unsure how to develop my skills. I read a couple books but the format (for me) didn't allow the ideas to stick. Finally discovering the wealth of knowledge in the Chessmaster program and realizing how well presented and user friendly it all was, felt like finding a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
Yeah, that's not too hyperbole. [rolls eyes]
(Oh yeah, in case you're wondering, I'm not a plant from the Chessmaster marketing team.
)
Cheat.
Elysium: The democratization of the web ... has installed an illusion of a digital first amendment that protects speech no matter how poorly spelled or stupid.
XBL: E Munnie
elementsofmeaning.blogspot.com
I, for one, learned the most by playing against other people. The ones that were better than me taught me a whole lot of what not to do, whereas the less talented players allowed me to work out new strategies, while defending without having to think too far in advance.
My attitude with Chess, and Pool especially, is that I really enjoy playing against someone who is better than I am. I find that is the best way to learn.
Oh, and watch out for en passant, it can be a crippling maneuver in certain situations. *cough...queen's pawn rush...cough*
Xbox Live : Aries GWJ PSN : AriesGWJ Spore : Ariesgwj
I haven't done 10th edition, but as I said, the tutorials in 9000 were thorough and excellent. I have no doubt that Aaron D. is telling the truth... even if he IS a plant, he's almost certainly right.
FWIW, Chessmaster : Grandmaster Edition hits the 360 on October 23rd. Not much info on it yet, but it looks like it will have tutorials based on Josh Waitzkin's new book, Chessmaster: The Art of Learning. Looks like it will have the single player game we all love, and multiplayer over Live. It will be interesting to see if this shakes out well. Chess, like poker, seems a better fit on the PC, which will also have this new edition.
Xbox Live: JayhawkerGWJ
last.fm: JayhawkerGWJ
My System and Chess Praxis by Aaron Nimzowich.
That is all.
This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn
If you already know all the rules, then really all you can do to get better is play. You'll learn more from a defeat than a victory, but you'll learn SOMETHING from every game.
The only strategic advice I can give you is try to control the middle and never sacrifice your queen unless you're sure it'll get you a checkmate.
NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.
Spore
FWIW, Chess on live is pretty good. Multi only, but good fun, decent simple implementation. Ping someone!
Gamertag: GWJ Rabbit | Last.fm | Twitter
"In other news, Miyamoto pissed on my head, and gave me a forecast of rain." - *Le
Controlling the middle is pretty sound advice, but sacrificing the queen is often advisable when you think it will lead to positional advantage. Getting too attached to particular material leads to rigidity in thinking and lost opportunity.
Tempo above material.
This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn
guys, guys... play with real people? What are we, savages?
on a more serious note, I guess I don't see the point in playing other people when I have no concept of strategy. Right now, chess isn't even FUN for me, since I feel like I have no idea what I'm doing.
I think I'll try and get a copy of Chessmaster 10th. Thanks for the write-up... sounds like just what I was looking for.
xbox LIVE: NatsuMatto
That's What She Said -- A Podcast About NBC's THE OFFICE
Follow me on Twitter: SommerMatt
My System is a classic, but it is pretty advanced for someone who has little knowledge of fundamentals. Personally, I'd pass on Chess Praxis and find a better collection of annotated games by a classical player like Capablanca or Alekhine. Learn classical play - rapid development, occupy/control the center with pieces, etc. before delving into Nimzo's hyper-modern strategies.
XBL: jakelegg | PSN: jakeleg-GWJ
Server info
I can see that, somewhat. That said, I think diving straight into Nimzo actually provides significant advantages. One is that you don't have to unlearn the rigidity of material-based static chess. I've coached kids that I've raised on My System who have gone on to do much better than me pretty quickly. I (and they) would argue that Nimzo's hyper modern strategies provide as solid a base of fundamentals as any traditional school... and better than most.
This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn
man, you guys are so far over my head I have no idea what you're talking about
xbox LIVE: NatsuMatto
That's What She Said -- A Podcast About NBC's THE OFFICE
Follow me on Twitter: SommerMatt
It's impossible to ask internet geeks for a "simple overview."
We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all.
"What misconception traveled down the road and made you want to be here?"