Israel declares war on anorexic models

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=entertainmentNews&storyID=2006-09-20T154604Z_01_L20280324_RTRUKOC_0_US-LIFE-FASHION-ISRAEL.xml&archived=False

Quote:
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Top Israeli retail companies have agreed not to employ overly thin models for their advertisements, joining a growing global campaign to fight anorexia within the fashion industry.

Adi Barkan, a leading fashion photographer, said he had secured commitments from firms that account for 60 percent of advertising volume in Israel to turn away models whose body mass index -- the ratio of height to weight -- is less than 18.

"The average BMI among our models is 14. The new pact comes into effect next week, when we expect all the major fashion agencies to sign on," Barkan told Reuters on Wednesday. He said underweight models would have a grace period to catch up.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

Yoda can kiss my ass
Donator
Grayjedi's picture
Location: The edge of ruin

Fine with me, I don't like scrawny, bone sticking out, no muscle tone women.

Go for their eyes boo

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

Funny though that they decided to do it by BMI. What about female body builders?

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

To Serve Man
Donator V3.0
CannibalCrowley's picture
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

BMI is BS

Necronomicondiment
H.P. Lovesauce's picture
Location: Straight Outta Arkham

Paleocon wrote:
Funny though that they decided to do it by BMI. What about female body builders?

They're lumpy and their boobs have shrunk.

...Did I just say that out loud?

RIP ChronicNecrosis

Nine Lives of Doom
PurEvil's picture
Location: Columbia, MD

Paleocon wrote:
Funny though that they decided to do it by BMI. What about female body builders?

Skin Fold Thickness (SFT) test. It's the only one a bodybuilder can really do, since they'll always come up overweight or have a high BMI with every other way of measuring it.

Glad to see the skeletons will have to put on some weight. Now if only the US would adopt this program.

IronClad Online: PurEvil

Throat Specialist
Donator
Dr.Ghastly's picture

CannibalCrowley wrote:
BMI is BS

Why?

Unfortunately, if I slash my wrist with my lightsaber it cauterizes instantly. - PurEvil on emo Star Wars plots.

Ph.D. in Awesome
Donator V4.0
Dr._J's picture
Location: Traversing the warp.

PurEvil wrote:
Paleocon wrote:
Funny though that they decided to do it by BMI. What about female body builders?

Skin Fold Thickness (SFT) test. It's the only one a bodybuilder can really do it, since they'll always come up overweight or have a high BMI with every other way of measuring it.

You could also do a bioelectric impedence test. Depending on their hydration level it could be farily accurate.

A Mind Without Purpose Will Walk In Dark Places

"I may be out of ammo but I ain't out of chainsaw B*TCHES!" - Sinister's warcry for Gears of War

Yoda can kiss my ass
Donator
Grayjedi's picture
Location: The edge of ruin

BMI is bs. When I was in the service they tried to use that. I had a 50 chest and a 32 waist but according to them I was 6 pounds over wieght and put me on the warning list.

Go for their eyes boo

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

I think we should have a more market based solution. If people buy stuff at shops with anorexic models, let there be anorexic models! I'm not going to tell the Israelis how to run their country, but I hope these measures don't happen here.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

To Serve Man
Donator V3.0
CannibalCrowley's picture
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Dr.Ghastly wrote:
CannibalCrowley wrote:
BMI is BS

Why?

It says that Arnold Schwarzenegger is fat.

Judging a person's fitness by just height and weight is inaccurate.

I Am The Greetest!
Donator
KaterinLHC's picture
Location: On the moon. Whaling.

I read today that the standard size for runway clothing, the stuff that models have to wear, is size 0. So making models gain weight is great and all, but unless they bump up the standard clothing size? Not going to help.

Anyway, I think this move is actually kinda discriminatory. Some women are just naturally skinny, a natural size 0, and thus, they make natural models. Should they be penalized because some cracked-out bitch is throwing up in a toilet? Yes, there's pressure to be skinny when you're a model. There's also pressure to be fit when you're a soldier, and fast when you're an athelete, and good with numbers when you're an accountant, and good with people when you're in sales...etc. Each job has its unique pressures.

What I think the real problem is that there's a disconnect between what the fashion industry wants and what the real world thinks the fashion industry wants. People think modelling is about holding up a standard of human beauty to which we should aspire. It's not. Modeling is about showing off clothing, not showing off attractive women. Very thin, slender women act as human clothes hangers, and that's the point. In fact, the more attractive your model is, the less focus is put on the clothing, which is bad. That's why models always seem so dead-faced and bored, and why there's been a trend in recent years for uglier or plainer-faced models. It's because their job is to show off the clothes, not show off someone wearing the clothes. Yes, it seems counter-intuitive. But when you think about it, it sort of makes sense.

Paleocon wrote:
Funny though that they decided to do it by BMI. What about female body builders?

Female body builders do not tend to become models. In fact, female body builders tend to have a very difficult time finding clothing that fits, because everything is scaled for a less muscular frame, even the larger sizes.

"Today's Tom Sawyer, he gets high on you, Kat. You." - Haakon7

My Website v. 3.0

Indecisive
Donator V4.0
Funkenpants's picture

The Israelis aren't also getting rid of fake boobs, are they? That would be a sign of the apocolypse or something.

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

Is there any hard science backing the allegation that skinny models kill people?

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

Consultant
TuYungTuDy's picture
Location: Laying mines in Karkand

Breaking News (TYDY): Condie Rice says that UN Security Council will not step in to intervene in this war until Isreal has a chance to drive as many skinny models out of the fashion industry.

On an unrelated note, average starting wage for new pron starlets drops to lowest levels in 20 years.

I'll fire aimlessly if you don't come out!

Throat Specialist
Donator
Dr.Ghastly's picture

TuYungTuDy wrote:
Breaking News (TYDY): Condie Rice says that UN Security Council will not step in to intervene in this war until Isreal has a chance to drive as many skinny models out of the fashion industry.

On an unrelated note, average starting wage for new pron starlets drops to lowest levels in 20 years.

Haha. You win.

Unfortunately, if I slash my wrist with my lightsaber it cauterizes instantly. - PurEvil on emo Star Wars plots.

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "La la la!"

Dr.Ghastly wrote:
CannibalCrowley wrote:
BMI is BS

Why?

Because Crowley's made it clear that he doesn't like healthy women.

Paleocon wrote:
Is there any hard science backing the allegation that skinny models kill people?

Look man, in the past, there have been skinny models in Israel. Also, rockets and bombs exploding all the time. Correlation? Try causality!

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

LobsterMobster wrote:

Look man, in the past, there have been skinny models in Israel. Also, rockets and bombs exploding all the time. Correlation? Try causality!

Hmm. Sounds like Richard Perle logic to me. I'll go with it.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

To Serve Man
Donator V3.0
CannibalCrowley's picture
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

LobsterMobster wrote:
Dr.Ghastly wrote:
CannibalCrowley wrote:
BMI is BS

Why?

Because Crowley's made it clear that he doesn't like healthy women.

Rolls =/= fit

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

I've often wondered where the fat = healthy mythology originates. The overwhelming scientific consensus is that being fat will negatively affect your quality of life, contribute to avoidable illness, reduce your self esteem, and kill you.

So I date size zero athletes and don't date girls with extra poundage. So what of it?

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

Finger of God
Donator V4.0
Staats's picture
Location: Minnesota

TuYungTuDy wrote:
Breaking News (TYDY): Condie Rice says that UN Security Council will not step in to intervene in this war until Isreal has a chance to drive as many skinny models out of the fashion industry.

On an unrelated note, average starting wage for new pron starlets drops to lowest levels in 20 years.

And I was gonna make a joke about the U.S. speeding up shipments of Twinkies to the region.

Xbox Live: StaatsM

I Am The Greetest!
Donator
KaterinLHC's picture
Location: On the moon. Whaling.

Paleocon wrote:
I've often wondered where the fat = healthy mythology originates. The overwhelming scientific consensus is that being fat will negatively affect your quality of life, contribute to avoidable illness, reduce your self esteem, and kill you.

It comes from the pre-Industrial Revolution days, where fat = better access to nutrients = better nourished = healthier. Poor people were skinny, because they didn't have the money for better food. And that idea has been around far, far longer than fat = gross.

I think it's funny how symptoms of poverty--skinny bodies, tanned skin--have become chic as access to health care and better food becomes more universal. In fact, I've heard it argued that skinny = healthy these days because skinny = access to better food = less access to junk food = better nourished = healthier. Same logic pattern. Just different end results.

"Today's Tom Sawyer, he gets high on you, Kat. You." - Haakon7

My Website v. 3.0

The Machine
Donator V2.0
lethial's picture
Location: NY

While I agree that BMI is BS, I think using it as a lower bound actually make sense.
BMI is geared more towards people that do not excercise. And since muscle weighs more then fat, people who excercise regularly are all overweight by BMI standards.

However, using it as a lower bound make a lot of sense. Since if someone's BMI is lower then the minimum for a particular height, the chances of that person is subjecting him/her self to some kind of unhealthy living conditions is very high.

Now about fat. Body builders actually have a lot of fat. Because fat is in all the muscles. What they don't have a lot of is the kind of fat that accumulate under their skin. But those fat are really not that bad either, since they serve as our only natural means of keep warm. Unless you have furs or something...

Personally, I think the whole focus on fat and body weight is just wrong... A better measure of one's physical health should be obtained from one's athletic performance. (strength, endurance etc.) And most importantly, from one's happiness. (I know, I know, there is no way to measure this, but I am a firm believer of mind-body connection, and a happy mind is vital for a healthy body)

Decisions are just decisions, there are neither "good" or "bad"
LobsterMobster wrote:

*In response to being rewarded with a in-game shack for NOT nuking FO3 city Megaton*
Yeah, but if you set off the bomb in Megaton you are rewarded with a parking lot!

Consultant
Donator
Agent 86's picture
Location: Go that way for many moons, then hang a left

I never realized that Lebanon was the world's source of skinny models.

Revolution? Vacation? Somebody fart?

1 Perk Every 1000th Post
Donator V5.0
Location: Exodus

No, Lebanon is the world's source for skinny blow-up dolls.

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

I've received pm from folks I care about and feel I need to clarify something here. I am NOT advocating prejudice against, ill treatment of, or ridiculing of overweight people. I do believe that folks are far more complex than the very superficial element of their appearance. Overweight folks are not lazy, irresponsible, bad parents, sociopaths, limp-wristed liberals, gun-toting crazies, or any other stereotype that might or might not be ascribed to them. They are simply people (which is complex enough as it is).

What I AM saying is that I think a concerted effort to oppose a market mechanism based on the allegation that anorexic models are harmful (without hard science to back it) seems to me a bit silly. The vast majority of positive male characters on TV are white. That doesn't make me want to bleach my hair blonde and get eyelid surgery.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

Yoda can kiss my ass
Donator
Grayjedi's picture
Location: The edge of ruin

Paleocon wrote:
I've received pm from folks I care about and feel I need to clarify something here. I am NOT advocating prejudice against, ill treatment of, or ridiculing of overweight people. I do believe that folks are far more complex than the very superficial element of their appearance. Overweight folks are not lazy, irresponsible, bad parents, sociopaths, limp-wristed liberals, gun-toting crazies, or any other stereotype that might or might not be ascribed to them. They are simply people (which is complex enough as it is).

What I AM saying is that I think a concerted effort to oppose a market mechanism based on the allegation that anorexic models are harmful (without hard science to back it) seems to me a bit silly. The vast majority of positive male characters on TV are white. That doesn't make me want to bleach my hair blonde and get eyelid surgery.

So you're saying its better to be fat.

Go for their eyes boo

Intern
Jayavarman's picture
Location: Long Beach, CA

As a clinician who deals with anorexia on a regular basis, I can tell you that BMI is a very good screening test. Of course there are healthy people with abnormal BMI's, especially well conditioned athletes. But for the purpose of screening models, I think it is an excellent step in the right direction. Other tests are important in the clinical management of anorexics (echo cardiograms, serum electrolytes, etc.) but none are as easy to collect as a BMI.

-Jayavarman.

Off With My Head!
Donator V2.0
LiquidMantis's picture
Location: Rocky Mtn. Foothills

lethial wrote:
Now about fat. Body builders actually have a lot of fat. Because fat is in all the muscles. What they don't have a lot of is the kind of fat that accumulate under their skin. But those fat are really not that bad either, since they serve as our only natural means of keep warm. Unless you have furs or something...

I'm curious as to where you get this. You can't just target focus fat loss. By burning off subcutaneous fat you'll also be burning intra/intermuscular and internal fat. Now bodybuilder lifting styles will develop more sarcoplasm than a power-based lifting program.

Xbox Live: LiquidmantisGWJ | PSN: LiquidmantisGWJ
Web: Mantis on the Mountain
--
My wife liked the man part monster I made. -Pharacon

Some call me Scritch.
unntrlaffinity's picture
Location: New Orleans, LA

I agree that the backlash can be as harmful as the original idea causing the harm.

I never thought I had a "type", I don't favor redheads over blondes, blondes over brunettes, girlie-girls, tom-boys, etc. But recent conversations with other friends have brought to my attention there does seem to be a pattern of my liking "skinny" chicks. The past couple girls I've been interested in have indeed been thin. Not anorexic skinny, but definitely thinner than "average". But also I don't see why this is such a problem for so many people. I'm a skinny guy. Again, not anorexic, but thin. Why is it unreasonable I'd be attracted to girls of a similar body type? It's one of the first things I remember covering in psych 101 that often (not everyone, I don't feel like sorting through everyone sounding off on how in their case they're hefty and their significant other not, toned and their other "comfy", just perhaps a majority) that people tend to be attracted to those physically similar to themselves. But when it comes up, it comes up on the side of my being shallow, which I think is silly.

I think I've gone on a bit of a tangent, but more in line with the ridiculousness of the backlash, before I quit my video store job recently a movie came out called "Phat Girlz". Monique is in it, she's the "big but beautiful" woman who is ostracized by everyone around her for being fat, but in the end she proves that big girls are pretty too and she nets, get this, a "mandigo with a king size--!", how the movie puts it, a tall, muscled, super-handsome African man. Which is just as ridiculous as the prejudices they're fighting against. The moral of the story is you can be fat and still get the model-looking fellow is just as silly as saying you have to be thin to get him, and it preaches internal beauty while pursuing external beauty. I find it absurd that the most realistic and fair portrayal of how subjects like this should be treated is the animated feature "Shrek".

"YOU SPOIL, YOU GET SPOILED! AAAAHAHAHAHAHA!"