Another look at "Lookism"

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

I think it was duckideva who bemoaned the phenomenon of "lookism" among American males (and me in particular). It is conventional wisdom that men are more guilty of practicing it than women, but a number of phenomena make me question that.

I have yet to do a truly scientific study, but my own anecdotal observations at malls, grocery stores, parks, and other public places indicates to me that the frequency of couples involving disproportionately overweight couples to favor women who are clearly more overweight than their male partners. Whereas a skinny woman with a fat man is rare enough to elicit comment (eg: "she's after his money" or "he must be great in bed"), it is altogether common to see the converse.

In the simple majority of cases I've seen, both parties carry extra weight, but even in these cases, it is more often than not the case that a man carrying extra weight is accompanied by a woman carrying a far greater extra percentage. (eg: a man that is 20 pounds over ideal weight will be accompanied by a woman carrying 40 or more).

Once again, this is highly unscientific and I'd be curious to hear other people's observations. If true, however, this would indicate (at least to me) a need to reexamine the commonly held wisdom that men are guiltier practicioners of "lookism" tham women.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

CEO
Certis's picture

I'm not very clear on what point you're making here. You've decided that fat men are with even fatter women so therefor the women are choosing men who are smaller, relative to their own size and are more hung up on looks? That's a nice story to tell, I guess, but it hardly strikes me as something that has any basis in reality. It could be that maybe, just maybe they like or even love each other regardless of how they look.

Your hypothesis assumes attraction is purely physical. Even on the onset of a relationship, that's not the case. This sounds like it will be a good debate for shallow people who can't see past the physical and can't imagine others could either.

I'll be watching this thread closely.

Certis beat me to it. - Elysium

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "Ho ho ho!"

Biology studies show that people find health and symmetry attractive, but are more likely to seriously pick a mate that's at their own level of health and symmetry. It happens in most species.

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Intern
JustinMcElroy's picture

I think you make some good points here, but we should be careful about confusing "skinny" with "attractive." Some wonderfully pretty women are carrying a few extra pounds, and on the male side of things, let's just say ... K-Fed.

That being said ... NOFATCHIX.

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. "” Samuel Beckett

Optimus Primate
Gorilla.800.lbs's picture
Location: New York, NY

Paleo: to sum up what Certis said, your post had some potential, but still fell short to ignite a truly stand-offish controversy. Here's a tip on how it instantly enhance it: add race.

Have you taken the race of your subjects into consideration? What color/ethnical background were the big butts you've been eyeballing? Put together a paragraph or two on that, and we're going places!

Xbox Live tag Gorilla800lbs

Intern
JustinMcElroy's picture

Oh, and were they Christians or Muslim?

Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better. "” Samuel Beckett

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "Ho ho ho!"

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

I'm happy everyone's getting a hearty laugh out of this, but I'm seriously curious about the nature of this phenomenon. Perhaps, as Certis seems to assert, this has nothing or little to do with weight as physical attraction, but my observation of a statistically significant phenomenon makes me wonder. Perhaps other conclusions can be drawn, but it does seem to me to at least challenge the idea that either: 1) fat is unattractive or 2) men are more shallow than women.

And just to be sure: Please refrain from the fat bashing on this thread. I'm seriously interested in a civil discussion on this.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

CEO
Certis's picture

LobsterMobster wrote:
Biology studies show that people find health and symmetry attractive, but are more likely to seriously pick a mate that's at their own level of health and symmetry. It happens in most species.

That pretty much sums it up on a biological level. There are exceptions all over the place, but I think as a general rule this fits.

Certis beat me to it. - Elysium

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

As I do every Saturday, I had a bagel and coffee with my running club after a run and we discussed this. After a straw poll of the runners, it became clear that the women in the group were FAR less likely to be involved with less physically active men than the men were to be involved with less physically active women (by a ratio of 5 to 1).

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "Ho ho ho!"

Quote:
All women are beautiful in the dark.

Quote:
The worst thing a fat man will do to his woman is eat dinner without her.

Paleo, perhaps an athletic club is not the appropriate place to ask, "hey, do you guys like fat people?"

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Nine Lives of Doom
PurEvil's picture
Location: Columbia, MD

Well, unfortunately your observations lack information... here's a question I thought of while looking at this:

How long have the couple been together? When Crystal and I got together (about 9 years ago) I was 20lbs underweight, and she was about the same. Now, I'm about 40 lbs overweight, and she's maybe 5lbs overweight. Thankfully I'm tall for my build, so I really don't look as obese as I am.

Quote:

Whereas a skinny woman with a fat man is rare enough to elicit comment (eg: "she's after his money" or "he must be great in bed")

To say that Crystal was only after my money would be quite laughable, since I was unemployed for 10 out of 12 months last year. Though if you want to believe I'm an all-star in bed, I won't argue

I believe I read somewhere that it's proven that after we choose a mate, we stop paying as much attention to how we look, so your observations are only on the "now", and not on the courting, which is what I believe you're after. You should also remember that being skinny wasn't attractive until fairly recently in human history. An overweight person was wealthy, and their girth showed that they could be gluttonous, therefore would be a good provider.

IronClad Online: PurEvil

Nine Lives of Doom
PurEvil's picture
Location: Columbia, MD

Quote:
After a straw poll of the runners

I agree with Lobster here, and would like to point out again that you are asking one group who they would go out with now, without knowing what the people you observed looked like when they were courting.

IronClad Online: PurEvil

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

PE,

I think you're missing the point I'm making. I'm certainly not saying that your relationship is one that indicates dysfunction. Rather, I'm saying that the phenom of a disproportionately overweight couple is far more common (at least in my observation) with females carrying at least a higher overweight percentage than their male partners. So much so that it elicits the aforementioned unkind comments.

I invite challenge to these observations though. Is this contrary to your own observation? Do you more often see slimmer women with fatter men? I suspect this will not be adequately resolved until a more scientific study is done. Even then, it is anyone's guess what conclusions can be drawn.

PurEvil wrote:

I agree with Lobster here, and would like to point out again that you are asking one group who they would go out with now, without knowing what the people you observed looked like when they were courting.

Though I accept that, I wonder why then this is the case. Are women less likely to remain active than men in the context of a committed relationship? Are men less likely to gain weight than women?

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

Nine Lives of Doom
PurEvil's picture
Location: Columbia, MD

I wasn't taking offense to this... sorry you got that impression. I'm overweight because I'm lazy, and I know it, and while it bothers me a little, it obviously doesn't bother me enough to work out. So far the only move I've made towards getting in shape was giving up regular soda... though I did drop about 20lbs from that.

While I agree that there are a good deal of couples where it's a skinny guy with a larger chick (I even had a girlfriend ask me why this is once), there are many factors that work against a simple observation. First off, as we get older, our metabolism slows down, but a woman's slows down much faster than a man's. Then you have to throw in the fact that a woman has to gain weight when she has children, as her body adjusts to taking care of the child she is carrying, as well as maintaining proper nutrients for herself. Also, you haven't determined whether the man was as big or bigger at one point, and has now lost the weight.

But I'll give you the fact that a scientific study would be an interesting read.

IronClad Online: PurEvil

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

PurEvil wrote:
I wasn't taking offense to this... sorry you got that impression. I'm overweight because I'm lazy, and I know it, and while it bothers me a little, it obviously doesn't bother me enough to work out. So far the only move I've made towards getting in shape was giving up regular soda... though I did drop about 20lbs from that.

While I agree that there are a good deal of couples where it's a skinny guy with a larger chick (I even had a girlfriend ask me why this is once), there are many factors that work against a simple observation. First off, as we get older, our metabolism slows down, but a woman's slows down much faster than a man's. Then you have to throw in the fact that a woman has to gain weight when she has children, as her body adjusts to taking care of the child she is carrying, as well as maintaining proper nutrients for herself. Also, you haven't determined whether the man was as big or bigger at one point, and has now lost the weight.

But I'll give you the fact that a scientific study would be an interesting read.

I haven't seen the evidence, but I'll go with you on the slowing metabolism being gender-wise differential. I understand the child carrying thing, but am noticing that this phenom is also increasingly pronounced in high school age kids as well.

I just wrote to my gf who is strugging for a doctoral research topic in public health. If this is appropriate, we may have our answer in a couple years.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

Bilge Cat
Donator V2.0
Farscry's picture
Location: Commanding at the Helm

Well, around where I live, the balance is pretty even in couples I've observed between which gender is more likely to be more heavyset than the other.

For my own feedback, since late college when I was hit hard by arthritis, I've tended towards being anywhere from 20-40 pounds overweight (currently I'm in the 40 range). No, the arthritis isn't an excuse, but it does rather limit me from the activities I used to really enjoy using for exercise (primarily running; I was a track runner in high school until my doctor instructed me to stop for my own good in my senior year). Biking is still enjoyable, but I don't swim (I can, I just don't like to swim around others; I'm still self-conscious about my psoriasis in that situation), and am trying to find some other good low-impact activities I can feasibly do year-round for exercise.

In my current relationship and my previous one, it's interesting to note that I experienced both sides of the weight-ratio.

My previous relationship was with a fantastic, wonderful woman who was a fair bit more overweight than I (I was around the 20-pound range during this timeframe; we dated for a few years). I don't say that as a criticism, just as an observation. I would have loved for her to be at her ideal weight, mostly because I knew that her weight bothered her, but also for the health factors. It didn't detract from her beauty to me at all, though. I'd still be dating her if she hadn't ended up going back to her previous mate.

My current relationship, I'm definitely the one more overweight. My girlfriend is only barely above her ideal weight (we all know that, unfortunately for our public health statistics, most adults in the US are at least somewhat overweight), while I'm in the 40-lbs range. My weight is starting to bother me more now that I'm with someone who is so close to her ideal; I don't want to be the fat guy with the hot babe, you know? Now, granted, I'm tall enough that I carry the weight better than I should, but I can still tell that I'm a good ways past where I should be. I've been taking more steps to handle that better (cutting down more on the fast food, though that's a huge weakness for me, switched to diet drinks about a year or two ago, and am starting to do exercise stuff with the GF), but I still want to get back to my ideal weight range both for my health and for my appearance.

I'll admit that I have some degree of shallowness; I don't have a specific poundage requirement, but I can admit that there's some intangible level of obesity that I simply can't look past to see attractiveness. It's fairly high on the scale, but it's there. I don't like admitting that, but there's a certain point past which a person simply becomes completely unattractive to me. A close friend of mine and I have had this conversation before; he's a little more strict in interpreting how much is too much than I am, but that's just the way it is. I don't fault him for it anymore than I fault myself for it.

I'd bet that most people have a certain point past which they'd have a really hard time looking. The only difference is how far that point is.

In my observation, there are just as many picky women about weight in the opposite sex as there are men.

Positronically Delicious
Donator
Danjo Olivaw's picture
Location: Krauser Lab

Conjecture:

1)People worry less about the size of their mate once they've dropped out of their sexual peak. So for men lookism would run out after the early twenties but for women it'd just be firing up, leading to a dispraportionate matchmaking ratio of fat.

2)There are more overweight women than men.

3)The severity of obesity is larger in women than in men.

The more I think about the first one the more it looks like crap to me, but not so much so that good writing and fudged statistics wouldn't get you a nice piece in a journal.

The last two conjectures seem more likely or otherwise (if your observations are an indicator of a statistical anomaly) there a lot of lonely, overweight men sitting at home next door to lonely, average/underweight women and they're just not hooking up. Or maybe they are hooking up but the fat men/less fat women couples don't go out so much.

Or maybe skinny women are more likely to be backstabbing, two-timing sluts -- too busy sleeping around to spend time holding hands at the mall with their loving soulmates. Are you reading this, Brenda? Why'd you have to go and do that? Why'd you have to ruin all that was good? I hope you get the clap with all the other hussies.

Bilge Cat
Donator V2.0
Farscry's picture
Location: Commanding at the Helm

Danjo Olivaw wrote:
Are you reading this, Brenda? Why'd you have to go and do that? Why'd you have to ruin all that was good? I hope you get the clap with all the other hussies.

Wait, I thought she cheated on me with you? That's why I dumped her. Did she already move on with her loose ways?!

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

Farscry wrote:

In my observation, there are just as many picky women about weight in the opposite sex as there are men.

I wonder if they are not MORE picky considering my observation.

Danjo Olivaw wrote:
Conjecture:

1)People worry less about the size of their mate once they've dropped out of their sexual peak. So for men lookism would run out after the early twenties but for women it'd just be firing up, leading to a dispraportionate matchmaking ratio of fat.

2)There are more overweight women than men.

3)The severity of obesity is larger in women than in men.

The more I think about the first one the more it looks like crap to me, but not so much so that good writing and fudged statistics wouldn't get you a nice piece in a journal.

The last two conjectures seem more likely or otherwise (if your observations are an indicator of a statistical anomaly) there a lot of lonely, overweight men sitting at home next door to lonely, average/underweight women and they're just not hooking up. Or maybe they are hooking up but the fat men/less fat women couples don't go out so much.

Or maybe skinny women are more likely to be backstabbing, two-timing sluts -- too busy sleeping around to spend time holding hands at the mall with their loving soulmates. Are you reading this, Brenda? Why'd you have to go and do that? Why'd you have to ruin all that was good? I hope you get the clap with all the other hussies.

Hmm. According to the statistics though http://www.obesity.org/subs/fastfacts/obesity_youth.shtml it appears that obesity is slightly more likely to strike boys than girls and about even in men and women. This would seem to refute conjectures 2 and 3.

I wonder if the phenom has to do with men courting and women choosing. It is, for instance, a lot easier for a woman of any condition to get male attention than a correspondingly attractive man to get female attention.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

To Serve Man
Donator V3.0
CannibalCrowley's picture
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

I have another alternate theory.

A lot of men are afraid of rejection, this can cause many to aim for women who are less than their ideal. So maybe the men in question simply picked girls more overweight than them in an effort to reduce the chances of being rejected.

Semper Delectatio

Xbox Live - Cannibal GWJ XFire - cannibalcrowley
Strawberry Shortcake bricked my 360 on December 17, 2008.

Executive
Fanatka's picture
Location: Irvine, CA

I have a hard time believing that the whole issue can be boiled down to fat vs. thin. The truth is, there are so many more factors at work here like, for instance, what is the maturity level of the person making the judgement?

Seriously, the older I get, the more I realize that heart, character, loyalty, faith, etc are *much* better measures of compatibility than physical appearance.

-Fan

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

CannibalCrowley wrote:
I have another alternate theory.

A lot of men are afraid of rejection, this can cause many to aim for women who are less than their ideal. So maybe the men in question simply picked girls more overweight than them in an effort to reduce the chances of being rejected.

Once again, this seems to speak to the whole "men court, women choose" dealio. Perhaps that is all this is.

I remember hearing some radio advice jock once state that "everyone wants to fcuk up". By that, he didn't mean that folks want to make a mess of things, but rather that everyone (irrespective of gender or gender preference) wants to fornicate with someone more attractive than themselves. Some folks aim for the fences, but most tend to set the bar just slightly beyond themselves.

I think that largely describes the vast majority of folks I've met. Certainly most men I know tend to be that way either consciously or unconsciously. As others have stated though, attraction can be pretty subjective, but the presence of subtle difference does not refute the existance of general standards of beauty. For instance, a statistically insignificant number of straight men would truthfully admit to finding Rosanne Barr more attractive than Claudia Schiffer.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

Fanatka wrote:
I have a hard time believing that the whole issue can be boiled down to fat vs. thin. The truth is, there are so many more factors at work here like, for instance, what is the maturity level of the person making the judgement?

Seriously, the older I get, the more I realize that heart, character, loyalty, faith, etc are *much* better measures of compatibility than physical appearance.

-Fan

And though that is all well and good, I think even you would have to admit that appearance is a significant factor in your courtship decisions. I am certainly not saying that it is the only selection criterion, but it is a significant one. Significant enough that exceptions to expectations are noted.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

Not a mistake, an evolution!
Donator V5.0
Chumpy_McChump's picture
Location: Trying to get to Mercy Hospital

CannibalCrowley wrote:
I have another alternate theory.

A lot of men are afraid of rejection, this can cause many to aim for women who are less than their ideal. So maybe the men in question simply picked girls more overweight than them in an effort to reduce the chances of being rejected.


Dammit, I was going to say that! I would further suggest that seeing as men are societally expected to do the majority of the courting (and certainly the majority of the initial overtures), and seeing as I would expect people that are... uncomfortable... with their weight would tend to pick even heftier people, you're more likely to see a propagation of heavy man/heavier woman than most other weight pairings.

MechaSlinky wrote:

Duoae wrote:
Danjo Olivaw wrote:

Blurpty durpty durp.

Blorp glorp florp!

Exactly.
-on L4D

This tag has been moved to P&C
Donator
Paleocon's picture
Location: Cabin John, MD

Chumpy_McChump wrote:
CannibalCrowley wrote:
I have another alternate theory.

A lot of men are afraid of rejection, this can cause many to aim for women who are less than their ideal. So maybe the men in question simply picked girls more overweight than them in an effort to reduce the chances of being rejected.


Dammit, I was going to say that! I would further suggest that seeing as men are societally expected to do the majority of the courting (and certainly the majority of the initial overtures), and seeing as I would expect people that are... uncomfortable... with their weight would tend to pick even heftier people, you're more likely to see a propagation of heavy man/heavier woman than most other weight pairings.

Yup. Women have less risk invested in the courtship process. Once again, men court and women choose.

This is the internet! In our natural environment, atheists run in packs and have dictionaries! --- JoeBeDurndurn

Claw Shrimp
Donator V4.0
LobsterMobster's picture
Location: On a picnic, going "Ho ho ho!"

You know, weight is not the sole measure of one's physical attractiveness...

NOTE: This is not a doodle bug.

Spore

Positronically Delicious
Donator
Danjo Olivaw's picture
Location: Krauser Lab

Paleocon wrote:
Hmm. According to the statistics though http://www.obesity.org/subs/fastfacts/obesity_youth.shtml it appears that obesity is slightly more likely to strike boys than girls and about even in men and women. This would seem to refute conjectures 2 and 3.

Those statistics, and none that I can find, say anything about the severity of obesity at all. So my third conjecture remains triumphant.

But I like the courting-choosing idea better. When an insecure man shoots for the less attractive woman that should give him a boost in confidence, the ultimate aphrodisiac.

All that and a
Donator V6.0
baggachipz's picture
Location: do() || !do(); $try=NULL;

Baggachipz, in college on way too many drunken nights wrote:
Oh, what do you jerks know, you're all going home alone!

I generated a virtual world in the toilet bowl this morning.
-- Podunk on the PS3's mystical, magical abilities

Indecisive
Donator V4.0
Funkenpants's picture

LobsterMobster wrote:
You know, weight is not the sole measure of one's physical attractiveness...

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I've known dudes who liked big women. But for some people, weight is going to be if not the sole measure, one of the primary measures.

I Am The Greetest!
Donator
KaterinLHC's picture
Location: On the moon. Whaling.

Paleocon wrote:
And though that is all well and good, I think even you would have to admit that appearance is a significant factor in your courtship decisions. I am certainly not saying that it is the only selection criterion, but it is a significant one. Significant enough that exceptions to expectations are noted.

I disagree. Attraction matters, but looks, not so much. As long as The Object Of Your Desire gives you naughty thoughts, it doesn't matter if he or she is fat, skinny, short, tall, or any color in the rainbow. Looks are almost besides the point, as long as you're sexually attracted.

"Today's Tom Sawyer, he gets high on you, Kat. You." - Haakon7

My Website v. 3.0